Silent Star 1: Lunacy
- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
VOTE: skitter
just gonna say this from the top and maybe ill do better sticking to it: im going to be making an effort to limit the hours in which im an active participant in this game. i enjoy mafia a lot but i also find it exhausting when im constantly thinking about it which leads to apathy. please do me a big favor and yell at me if you notice im posting in the thread all throughout the day. i will be happier and honestly probably better/more engaged in this game if i can practice a little restraint.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
hi sorry i intended to enter the game in earnest earlier but a lot happened today. was kinda hoping someone would react to my first post but i guess you all just don't care about me. i see how it is.
dunnstral how serious was your early push on skitter? do you still stand by that reasoning you gave?
skitter's reaction to dunn's push is kinda towny imo.
blah blah blah
scumposting.In post 121, Clover Ebi wrote:Am I the only one who is getting like, no scum pings from Dunnstral/Skitter/Lilith/Votato? I got townie pings from the first 3 and nothing from Votato. Just me? Okay.
VOTE: Clover Ebi
beeboy this feels like a huuuuuuge stretch. i actually agree with your initial assessment of tuxedo mask's case but you engaged Tux; why is it scummy for him to focus on responding to you?beeboy wrote:I don't think these are complex thoughts either yet they make your argument come across as incredibly flawed. And now your centering all your content around this 1v1.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
...who isn't seeing it?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
disagree that arguing in good faith is a towntell of any kind. if anything, scum are often cordial because they dont want to piss people off.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
uhhh actually i misread it. i thought it said you were getting no pings on anyone, not that you were townreading them. my impression was that you were excusing yourself from forming readsClover Ebi wrote:Nahdia why do you think that post by me was scum?
VOTE: beeboywe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
was there gonna be any followup to thisIn post 186, votato wrote:im getting weird vibes
@dunn asked you a question earlier. do you still stand by the reasoning you gave for the early skitter push? is there any more context?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
overreaction to tux.In post 207, beeboy wrote:In post 204, Nahdia wrote:
was there gonna be any followup to thisIn post 186, votato wrote:im getting weird vibes
@dunn asked you a question earlier. do you still stand by the reasoning you gave for the early skitter push? is there any more context?
Why?In post 201, Nahdia wrote:
uhhh actually i misread it. i thought it said you were getting no pings on anyone, not that you were townreading them. my impression was that you were excusing yourself from forming readsClover Ebi wrote:Nahdia why do you think that post by me was scum?
VOTE: beeboywe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
Link to VC on this page.
In post 187, Nahdia wrote:
beeboy this feels like a huuuuuuge stretch. i actually agree with your initial assessment of tuxedo mask's case but you engaged Tux; why is it scummy for him to focus on responding to you?beeboy wrote:I don't think these are complex thoughts either yet they make your argument come across as incredibly flawed. And now your centering all your content around this 1v1.In post 188, beeboy wrote:
No your right it isn't, I am getting upset and tunneling him because I see things clearly other people arent. Sorry I'll give him space.In post 187, Nahdia wrote:beeboy this feels like a huuuuuuge stretch. i actually agree with your initial assessment of tuxedo mask's case but you engaged Tux; why is it scummy for him to focus on responding to you?
This sums up my vote on beeboy. The logic doesn't make him look bad, but beeboy's attitude does. beeboy engages tux, tux responds to beeboy, and suddenly beeboy is smearing him as "centering all his content around this 1v1" (I explained why this doesn't make sense) and he's frustrating because "I see things clearly other people aren't" (the exchange had literally just begun virtually no one else checking in).In post 189, Nahdia wrote:...who isn't seeing it?
It reads like he's trying to conjure towny frustration but it doesn't seem at all appropriate to the situation. The mindset isn't right.Last edited by Hectic on Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:36 am, edited 1 time in total.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
also i literally misread clover's post and changed my vote once i realized. im not sure how that constitutes a push.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
In post 201, Nahdia wrote:
uhhh actually i misread it. i thought it said you were getting no pings on anyone, not that you were townreading them. my impression was that you were excusing yourself from forming readsClover Ebi wrote:Nahdia why do you think that post by me was scum?
VOTE: beeboywe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
do you disagree or..?In post 253, Dunnstral wrote:
dot dot dotIn post 250, Nahdia wrote:The logic doesn't make him look bad, but beeboy's attitude does. beeboy engages tux, tux responds to beeboy, and suddenly beeboy is smearing him as "centering all his content around this 1v1" (I explained why this doesn't make sense) and he's frustrating because "I see things clearly other people aren't" (the exchange had literally just begun virtually no one else checking in).
What are you talking aboutwe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
okay well i dont understand why beeboy felt that way. or at least, i dont see why town decides it's a reason someone is scum. hence a stretch.skitter30 wrote:
tbh i feel like this is more you smearing beeboy than beeboy smearing tuxIn post 250, Nahdia wrote:and suddenly beeboy is smearing him as "centering all his content around this 1v1" (I explained why this doesn't make sense)
like he's right, tux was largely engaging wrt beeboy and not doing much else
i'm not sure i agree with the connotation (i.e. that it's scummy taht tux is doing such) but i'm also not sure it's scummy of beeboy to say this either, because i can understand why beeboy felt that way
also i feel like 188 is a townie reaction to what you said about beeboy's push, no?
also you're right in that you dropped your clover push, i retract that part of my push
as i said to midway, no, 188 isn't towny. scum will often back down and try to appear cordial. not saying town can't too, but i can 100% see that coming from scum!beeboy if my assessment up till then had been correct.
what aren't you seeing? is there a specific point that doesn't register to you?Dunnstral wrote:
Yeah, I don't see itIn post 255, Nahdia wrote:
do you disagree or..?In post 253, Dunnstral wrote:
dot dot dotIn post 250, Nahdia wrote:The logic doesn't make him look bad, but beeboy's attitude does. beeboy engages tux, tux responds to beeboy, and suddenly beeboy is smearing him as "centering all his content around this 1v1" (I explained why this doesn't make sense) and he's frustrating because "I see things clearly other people aren't" (the exchange had literally just begun virtually no one else checking in).
What are you talking aboutwe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
whoopsIn post 216, drusilla wrote:In post 187, Nahdia wrote:was kinda hoping someone would react to my first post but i guess you all just don't care about me. i see how it is.
additionally, what sort of reactions were you hoping for?In post 166, drusilla wrote:
why share this? i understand the logic of holding yourself to that but do you have an expectation of others actually discouraging you from posting throughout the day?In post 16, Nahdia wrote:just gonna say this from the top and maybe ill do better sticking to it: im going to be making an effort to limit the hours in which im an active participant in this game. i enjoy mafia a lot but i also find it exhausting when im constantly thinking about it which leads to apathy. please do me a big favor and yell at me if you notice im posting in the thread all throughout the day. i will be happier and honestly probably better/more engaged in this game if i can practice a little restraint.
i guess maybe it's not an entirely reasonable expectation for others to tell me to be less active now that you put it like that. but it would be nice.
wasn't any specific reaction i was looking for. i guess just curious if people would conjure reasons for it being AIwe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
eh. ive seen scum bend over in an effort to look pro-town because they're arguing nicely. ive seen scum be stubborn with their pushes.skitter30 wrote:
i feel like scum continue pushing that tho?In post 263, Nahdia wrote:as i said to midway, no, 188 isn't towny. scum will often back down and try to appear cordial. not saying town can't too, but i can 100% see that coming from scum!beeboy if my assessment up till then had been correct.
you called someone in your townpile logically scum?votato wrote:as for the part of my realist directed at you I'm not sure what i meant tbh. You're in my townpile, and i think you were at that point toowe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
maybe i should reframe. it's not so much that beeboy is faking it as i have a feeling it's not how town!beeboy would react there. the aggression can be both real and also scummy. i maintain the "I see things clearly other people arent" is out of place tho.In post 293, Clover Ebi wrote:I got light town pings from beeboy because of the frustration because it seemed real to me. In the game I've played with beeboy before he was cool as a cucumber. Do you think he's likely to fake this anger because it's something 'town' him most do as scum? I suppose you could make an argument for saying beeboy wouldn't get mad at scum but the main problem I have is the pretense that he's faking this and that's just not how I took it.
caught up, kinda
votato talking about townblocks all the time feels like buddiyng. not to mention admits he's apathetic as town and has the second-highest posts?
midwaybear gives all kinds of thoughts/analysis and then says they have no reads in 355.
morning tweet seems actually engaged in sorting players.
to answer her question on tux: i did say i thought his entrance was a reach i think? but looking back, it get the feeling scum would be less likely to enter on something so.. elaborate?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
a lot of names i kind of just glazed over, itt.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
the combination of talking about forming townblocks and the tone. im not sure how to better explain it, it's just something i find comes from scum. there's a lot more scum motivation in forming a townblock than town motivation.Raven Branwen wrote:In post 464, Nahdia wrote:
maybe i should reframe. it's not so much that beeboy is faking it as i have a feeling it's not how town!beeboy would react there. the aggression can be both real and also scummy. i maintain the "I see things clearly other people arent" is out of place tho.In post 293, Clover Ebi wrote:I got light town pings from beeboy because of the frustration because it seemed real to me. In the game I've played with beeboy before he was cool as a cucumber. Do you think he's likely to fake this anger because it's something 'town' him most do as scum? I suppose you could make an argument for saying beeboy wouldn't get mad at scum but the main problem I have is the pretense that he's faking this and that's just not how I took it.
caught up, kinda
votato talking about townblocks all the time feels like buddiyng. not to mention admits he's apathetic as town and has the second-highest posts?
midwaybear gives all kinds of thoughts/analysis and then says they have no reads in 355.
morning tweet seems actually engaged in sorting players.
to answer her question on tux: i did say i thought his entrance was a reach i think? but looking back, it get the feeling scum would be less likely to enter on something so.. elaborate?
That’s interesting, @votato, are you usually this engaged as town? But I don’t understand, Nahdia. Why does talking about townblocks read as buddying to you? This is my problem with you in a nutshell, you make one statement I can kind of agree with, then combine it with another that leaves me scratching my head.
i mean ive been over this but it's less the fact that he responded and more how he did so.Kanna wrote:
a slight problem i have is i don't know how beeboy can otherwise react? he was replying to tux's push on him which is just...as you would do in a game of mafia. how do you think town!beeboy would react?In post 464, Nahdia wrote:maybe i should reframe. it's not so much that beeboy is faking it as i have a feeling it's not how town!beeboy would react there. the aggression can be both real and also scummy. i maintain the "I see things clearly other people arent" is out of place tho.
although on readback, i'm not sure what he meant by "see things other people aren't seeing" either.
@beeboy; can you elaborate on that?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
my reads are, in fact, surface level. that doesn't make them also not accurate statements that can indicate scum. i'm looking for scum motivation, and it's there in those posts i point out.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
lilith im having trouble parsing your read on me. is it just that i didn't respond to tux when... i was pointing out something i found scummy that beeboy did?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
like, there's a lot of slots i havent interacted with on this table!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
have literally already talked about this!In post 464, Nahdia wrote:to answer her question on tux: i did say i thought his entrance was a reach i think? but looking back, it get the feeling scum would be less likely to enter on something so.. elaborate?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i mean, to be clear, scum could enter with something like that. but i dont think it's indicative in the same way what i noticed beeboy was doing is. so that's what i focused on.
i mean i see what you're saying here skitter. but it's day 1, there's no mechanical foothold in this game, and it's a bigger table by my standards. im gonna plead with you not to read too far into my disengagement. what do you want me to comment on?skitter30 wrote:
it's just more like ... there's a lot of things that's taken place ittIn post 514, Nahdia wrote:my reads are, in fact, surface level. that doesn't make them also not accurate statements that can indicate scum. i'm looking for scum motivation, and it's there in those posts i point out.
and i dont' inherently disagree that you've made valid points
my problem is more that out of everythiing that's happened those are the things you chose to comment on? it just feels really shallow and like vague surface-level observations that you've thrown out to make people look bad than actually like you're using these things to sort people. these observations don't seem to be going anywhere and given the lack of a broader scumreads they feel disjointed if that makes sensewe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
firm stances are for people who arent plagued by self-doubt!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
have you ever heard the phrase "caught for the wrong reasons"? it's a stupid cliche that bad players, like myself, use to describe when a player reacts poorly to a poor case on them.
as in: beeboy, caught for the reason reasons.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
"caught" is relative. the point stands.
morningtweet is town, midwaybear is scum(?). dunnstral is scum.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i also think you're town!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i think, as scum here, it's probably very easy to just shove at me. but the way you're engaging seems less like "feeling out for a good mislynch" and more like an actual effort to sort me!
midway i'm tentative on because apparently he has a reputation for being scummy. i was back modding a game he was in where i kind of saw that. i would like to pressure that slot though. dunnstral i was fine with early because his initial vote was RVS and latching onto the tiniest reasons then is fine. but he's stubbornly held onto the read when i and others have asked him to go back and recontextualize it.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
morningtweet was kind of gut. there was one post in particular that made me think "oh this person is actually trying to sort". 334.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
mafia is weird because i dont like being scumread but it's also a lot easier to sort people when they're pressuring you. at least, i think so.
i shoul read lilith huh?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
you should answer this question too!In post 536, Clover Ebi wrote:I probably should've added on some kind of question onto that post now that I think about it, but I can't really think of one that would really help with my reads. Hm, how about.
What do the 4 people above think about the gamestate right now? What is scum doing at the moment?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
lilith can you like, summarize your raven read? i see a few points directed on them in your ISO but a general summation would be nice.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
sorry, what's LHF mean?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
oh, funny that should come up. because it's basically what i think of you.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
that you're pushing LHF that is. not that you are.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i dont know how one reads Raven' posts as disconnected when they all seem to follow a very clear progression. like, she's devoid of content, yes, but it's all rather consistent content. she outs a few scattered thoughts as the game progresses, but there are two consistent arcs:
her confusion on how to read me
and her read on votato, which she updates as she goes.
so you're townreading everyone you've interacted with?lilith2013 wrote:I mean, I feel like I've developed decent reads on everyone who I've interacted with, so who's left? people who I haven't talked to, which is pretty much equivalent to low-contentwe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
whether or not the confusion is performative or the votato progression is invalid, it's consistent. which i point out because you referred to her posts as "disconnected". and i dont see how you could have come to that conclusionlilith2013 wrote:
Already mentioned that I think her confusion comes off as performativeIn post 556, Nahdia wrote:i dont know how one reads Raven' posts as disconnected when they all seem to follow a very clear progression. like, she's devoid of content, yes, but it's all rather consistent content. she outs a few scattered thoughts as the game progresses, but there are two consistent arcs:
her confusion on how to read me
And I don't think the votato read/progression is a valid one. 467 is like, leading up to scumreading both votato and you. She agrees with your push on votato but questions it at the same time.and her read on votato, which she updates as she goes.
No - what I mean is that I feel like the people who I still need more content from to sort are mostly in the low-content end of the playerlist. Also I feel like I've followed up with most of those people in one way or another (see 512 - this includes drusilla, MT, raven, and midway)
so you're townreading everyone you've interacted with?lilith2013 wrote:I mean, I feel like I've developed decent reads on everyone who I've interacted with, so who's left? people who I haven't talked to, which is pretty much equivalent to low-contentwe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
which is it. do you need more content from our slots, or do you think we're scum?In post 488, lilith2013 wrote:Idk if it’s really as easy as raven/nahdia but that’s kind of where I’m at
VOTE: lilithwe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
do we have a different definition of LHF or something? what i mean is like, she's pushing the same people she says she needs more content on as scum. the reads feel "easy".In post 600, skitter30 wrote:
in raven?In post 549, Nahdia wrote:that you're pushing LHF that is. not that you are.
i kinda very much disagree with this take ...
i mean i remember liking the reasoning on your early lilith read. any updates there?In post 604, beeboy wrote:
Stop voting towns :'(In post 563, Nahdia wrote:
which is it. do you need more content from our slots, or do you think we're scum?In post 488, lilith2013 wrote:Idk if it’s really as easy as raven/nahdia but that’s kind of where I’m at
VOTE: lilithwe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i mean, there are a lot of slots you just havent spoken on. why the extra effort to sort me in particular?
@raven that iswe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i guess. my feeling was just that like, raven and i have both been fairly low impact posters thus far. so it's "easiest" to scumread us because we're not likely to hit back hard.In post 610, skitter30 wrote:
i mean she also explained why she's scumreading her, it's not like she's just going like 'meh skitter isn't here so i'll vote her' or somethingIn post 609, Nahdia wrote:do we have a different definition of LHF or something? what i mean is like, she's pushing the same people she says she needs more content on as scum. the reads feel "easy".we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
my other game is over i can focus up here
skitter, do you have much of a read on raven independent on her being partners with me at this point?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
drusilla what do you mean kanna is "too aware"? i can see what you're getting at with beeboy maybe, though i dont think it's unreasonable for him to have had the same though lilith did wrt your questions.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i mean i guess this makes sense, but i think there's just as much town motivation as scum motivation for that wording. point taken tho.In post 681, drusilla wrote:
it felt like she had been thinking about both how much support she would have for her push on skitter and how that push would look to others. others had previously been townread for pushing skitter and for starting wagons with little support and to borrow kanna's word her push felt convenient.In post 679, Nahdia wrote:drusilla what do you mean kanna is "too aware"?
independent of that i have kanna as town. post 622 in particular seems like a town thought. and i p much agree with how she's reading raven.
have some more thoughts on her skitter push but i want to hear back from skitter first on where she is on raven outside of any associations with me.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i think raven has a pretty clear progressions. i dont see why she harps on not being able to read my slot as scum, particularly when there are a lot of other things she could comment on. her wariness towards people pushing the easy targets feels real, especially given how she explained it in 630.In post 683, beeboy wrote:Btw, I am not actually feeling anyone's Raven read, I don't really see where that read is coming from.
Someone help me with that, they just read as null for me.
The only thing is she called Nahdia LHF, which I agree even cutting out all knowledge from outside this game just isn't true. Although I just don't think this game has LHF, even the newer players like Tux are perfectly capable of defending themselves.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
why is everyone reading for partners on day 1?!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
seriously, has this become part of the site meta? it's wild to me.back in my day, we would wait for scumflips to read far into associations.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i mean i at least understand the basis of the read i guess. but i dont see how that's any kind of scumtell. why can't stream of consciousness thoughts like this come from town?In post 702, lilith2013 wrote:In post 568, lilith2013 wrote:
these 3 lines are about completely separate things - so I don't see a coherent thought process behind this post.In post 330, Raven Branwen wrote:@Dunn, what makes you think Skitter’s posting is “fake”?
I don’t understand Nadhia at all.
@Votato, what is so scummy about Clover not having any confident scumreads early on D1?In post 569, lilith2013 wrote:
Also theseIn post 466, Raven Branwen wrote:The more I read from this game, the more confused I get. I’m liking Votato a bit better now but I still don’t understand why Clover is his #1 scumread.
I have 0 experience with Lillith but nothing she’s posting is particularly pinging me.
Anyone here have meta on Nadhia? I’m having the most trouble trying to parse her.
@Dunn, can you please answer my Skitter question? Thanks.
And thanks @mod for preventing me from undue eyestrain.
Nahdia did you have any response to this?In post 570, lilith2013 wrote:Nahdia, I'm arguing that each of her posts, taken individually, doesn't make sense to me and I don't understand how she comes up with a post with this many different things going on that don't seem to be connected.
i mean the thought did cross my mind that as scum you don't really have the need to produce this much content.In post 705, lilith2013 wrote:I'm positive there's scum on my wagon. I can't understand anyone who's seriously scumreading me - if you think I am capable of creating this much content with so many different underlying threads going on when I'm scum, then I'm actually super flattered you think I'm that good, but I feel like I'm the most obvtown slot in this game.
idk. i guess you do have a reason to be scumreading raven, though i disagree with pretty much the whole thing. even so it's at least a bit less convenient now.
literally how? i was wary of lilith's reads because they seemed convenient & i didn't understand the reasoning. but looking closely at her posts, it did raise the question i asked of her. what about that screams partner like, at all?
knew this was coming. i'll tell you the exact same thing i told you in BOTC: they're completely different games. in botc, the setup allowed me to enter with a specific plan and there were mechanics i could base all my reads on. in this game, that doesn't exist. you can't expect the same level of engagement when it's literally just a matter of scumhunting versus explaining/extrapolating from heavy mechanics. im a mechanically oriented player.In post 717, skitter30 wrote:
Not particulalrly, noIn post 678, Nahdia wrote:my other game is over i can focus up here
skitter, do you have much of a read on raven independent on her being partners with me at this point?
Hey, remember how in botc i said you were town cuz that game looked too different than your recent scumgame?
This looks like your recent scumgame
okay, so if you don't have any independent read on raven, why are you reading us as partners as opposed to just me trying to pocket her?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
you're comparing >24 window of time in which i was in a 9 person game to a 13 person game. like, i do get your read. i think the meta is a valid push. but all i can say is it's wrong in this case. in mbos i was immediately engaged and wagoned and like i said, that makes it a lot easier to read people. there were also fewer slots to keep track of. and i have scumhunted here.In post 731, skitter30 wrote:
Tbh this is a large basis for the scumread, and i couldnt really bring this up until nowIn post 721, Nahdia wrote:knew this was coming. i'll tell you the exact same thing i told you in BOTC: they're completely different games. in botc, the setup allowed me to enter with a specific plan and there were mechanics i could base all my reads on. in this game, that doesn't exist. you can't expect the same level of engagement when it's literally just a matter of scumhunting versus explaining/extrapolating from heavy mechanics. im a mechanically oriented player.
I think that you're lacking the interest/drive/wim/charisma that you had in your towngame, in a way similar to how you lacked it in your scumgame
And i can cite the mbos game too now. You just have more 'weight' as town, and you're more involved. As scum you just feel ... shallow. Like you're around but not motivated to hunt. And i think that's what you're doing here, and i think it's scummy.
I dont think the lack of mechanics is an adequate explanation really. You still scumhunted in botc
.... so why is raven liking being defended towny? skitter do you usually try to read for partners on d1?In post 747, skitter30 wrote:
no, nahdia would be the s in that scenarioIn post 738, lilith2013 wrote:skitter, when you say "raven likes being defended by [nahdia]," is that implying that raven is the S in the SvT? How can nahdia be WKing raven then?
overindexing on finding partners early is scum mindset imo. sure, some town can do it. but for scum, having partners and considering how you're distancing/associating with them is at the forefront. this is actually what got me caught in the large normal you're referring to!
and considering you admit to not individually reading raven despite all this content based around her, and that the way you're pivoting from SvS to TvS is nonsensical, it's a huge red flag.
gonna go back and reread/case bc i was townleaning earlier but the last time you were pushing me for whacky reasons and i softed up on you, you ended up being scum!
VOTE: skitter30we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
perhaps in my reread i may lay down some BRACKETS as well. my reads are actually p good in mbos!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i was only in mbos for... 22 hours? idk im not going back to look. i remember it being less than 24 hours. i think my carrot is pointing the wrong way!
and yes that's the problem with meta. there is no way for me to tell you that you're wrong other than tell you that you're wrong. i can point out the differences in the scenarios but if you don't agree with them well, you'll just have to update your meta for next game!
the different is in that game, the wagon was like, immediate, and had lots of people on it, and ended with a lynch in under a day. none of that has happened this game.
a) ??? paraphrase is "i thought it was svs but raven liked being defended so maybe it's tvs". im not sure how else to interpret that.skitter30 wrote:
a) i didn't say that i thought raven was townie, don't put words in my mouth. i said that you guys look like svt, which is not at all the same thingIn post 750, Nahdia wrote:.... so why is raven liking being defended towny? skitter do you usually try to read for partners on d1?
overindexing on finding partners early is scum mindset imo. sure, some town can do it. but for scum, having partners and considering how you're distancing/associating with them is at the forefront. this is actually what got me caught in the large normal you're referring to!
and considering you admit to not individually reading raven despite all this content based around her, and that the way you're pivoting from SvS to TvS is nonsensical, it's a huge red flag.
gonna go back and reread/case bc i was townleaning earlier but the last time you were pushing me for whacky reasons and i softed up on you, you ended up being scum!
b) i try not to look for partners day1 but i sometimes end up doing that to my dismay ...
c) i'm kinda baffled that i'm getting this much pushback on the you/raven thing, which makes me think i'm on to something ...
d) i think that you're scum. more than that, i am very confident that you're scum. i think that there's something very wacky in how you're engaging with raven, and it makes me think there's at least one scum in the pair. the more i thought about it, i settled on tvs over svs, and i'm not sure why it's a nonsensical read or a red flag
e) and yes, i'd love to hear more about why i'm pushing you for whacky reasons, and why you think i'm scum here.
the basic premise is this: i think that your mind instantly went to "partners" rather than white-knighting when you admit to not even having an independent read on raven is SUPER telling of your mindset. that's a major logical leap.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
sober nahdia is too headsick to play mafia so instead you get drunk nahdiawe're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i have been voted thrice. and like the bloodiest of marys, i come to reap my revenge.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
if im being honest, i think i approached this game with the wrong mindset. the wrong framing. i have sort of coasted. as a result. things have thrown me off this game. i believe it was votato who said that he was gettin g"weird vibes" and i have also been the receiptient of said vibes. it is a shame he is gone without elborating terribly on that (well not really LOL fuck him) but i digress. i apologize for coasted, and will now Solve this Mafia Game for you all, as your Elder Gamer.
i am unsettled by my vote on skitter! i think, frankly, that i am right that skitters posting is indicative of some funny business. as i explained: reading myself/raven as a patnership, but not also individually reading raven, is scummy because scum are predisposed to be thinking about partnerships. i accept that people perhaps do more partner reading before any flips nowadays, but she admitted to not individually reading raven. so to push that associative while not also trying to check her work is Bad.
beeboy, you call a skitter lynch garbage. why must you besmirch my wonderful vote?we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i did not finish writing about skitter before i hit submit. i was talking about unsettlement. in mbos, skitter was pushing me for a reason i felt was... kind of strange and bad, though maybe not entirely invalid. it turns out, she was scumthere and was being opportunistic. in this instance, she is pushing me more on meta, which i actally think is, perhaps more believable. and as i have said previously, her actual content i hve townread. but in mbos i came around to thinking her content was towny too, and it was not to be...we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
tuxedo mask sheeps his townreads, but then also doubtcasts his townread, beeboy! a heinous crime.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
beeboy i am concerned that i and two of my townreads are in your PoE!!!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i do not know what to make of drusilla. similar to skitter, i think their indexing on partner reads is odd. but perhaps that is in fact The MEta. beeboy made a point when talking about clover using recent knowledge. which drusilla did in 818 and it gave me pause, since because i was kind of going in predisposed to find her scummy that pause is moreso? that was something. but i dont like how she seems to just use me being scum as a baseline assumption without, justifying it? like, to read beeboy or kanna as partners.
MORNING TWEEET.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
you should unvote me. because i am town.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
we're both town, this game. your vote wounds me, but i will survive.
i see you townread skitter. but most of your spoiler tag on skitter is actually discussing me. my ego is stroked, but a scumread on me, town!skitter does not make.we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
that is uncharitable... i am only pushing one of those slots!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020- Nahdia
-
Nahdia They/ThemScheherazade
- Nahdia
They/Them- Scheherazade
- Scheherazade
- Posts: 10626
- Joined: February 14, 2016
- Pronoun: They/Them
i have come around mostly on beeboy. i would revisit him, but i have liked what he is putting down with all of his reads, actually. hence why, i went to go read drusilla, and maybe i could convince him to go back to voting her, hand in hand. but i am not sure. i think i would also like midwaybear. i will also need to actually read his points. like i did with drusilla. i have not been reading a lot of posts this game!we're all made of stories | remember to take your b12 | sign up for a GTKAS thread! (request access here)
"I’m going to harness love for epidemiological purposes."-Zaphkael, 2020 - Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia
- Nahdia