Open 785: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Game over!]
- Raya36
-
Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I get that conclusion from votato stating that there can be only one majestic equine then voting you. You're wording suggests intent to get a wagon on votato and the only reason for choosing votato seems to be him voting for you. Omgus is still omgus even if it's in rvs and banter. Then you engage with the player who votes votato as well and I also sense a light attempt at buddying this player.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
It is reasonable to vote votato back but I find it odd that you're pushing for a wagon.In post 30, HoldenGolden wrote:
Quoting this half as I'm fine with the analysis of first mate porky, even if it's wrong.In post 29, Raya36 wrote:I get that conclusion from votato stating that there can be only one majestic equine then voting you. You're wording suggests intent to get a wagon on votato and the only reason for choosing votato seems to be him voting for you. Omgus is still omgus even if it's in rvs and banter.
I find your claim to be a stretch however. If you concede that the dreaded "Big horn" Votato called me out to duel from your point of view, then why must I not vote there? I'm don't see how you are reaching your conclusion if that's the context you are providing.
Furthermore, 'tis th' reasonin' ye seem t' be citin' fer me votin' votato. Where does it reference votato's vote on me directly?If ye wish t' join me crew, we must destroy th' pathetic trivial cap'n known as "big horn" votato. He has breached priate law far too many times 'n be woefully dishonest, even fer a pirate!
Yes, that is what I'm referring to. It does not reference his vote directly but that is not needed if you read the game. It's very clear you're going against him for voting you and generally when scum omgus votes they don't state that.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
It was actually mainly this but you are still correct about the Porky part as wellIn post 40, HoldenGolden wrote:
Belay that, be th' underline part o'er me focusin' on porky vote on 'im?In post 37, Raya36 wrote:It is reasonable to vote votato back but I find it odd that you'repushing for a wagon.
I can actually see now if that's th' case how ye got t' that conclusion. I thought yer were claimin' that me intial vote on votato was a hard commitment t' wagonnin' votato which didnt make sense.
In post 8, HoldenGolden wrote: If ye wish t' join me crew, we must destroy th' pathetic trivial cap'n known as "big horn" votato. He has breached priate law far too many times 'n be woefully dishonest, even fer a pirate!- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Why?
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Maybe I will accept your offerIn post 66, HoldenGolden wrote:Now then, I shall be extendin'toes o' friendship(ToF) t' both ray 'n votato. Votato fer th' mindmeld o'er porky. Ray I currently am enjoyin' them diggin' at stuff on me, mohonk, 'n Craig.
Thar also th' point that scum!ray could o' rebuttal chemist read on me based on meta yet decided nah t'. If they were scum, I kinda expected them t' undermine t' keep th' wee push on me goin'.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Reachy yes, but did we not get out of rvs?In post 67, Eevee wrote:sorry 'm late i was just training first aid and sailing in the lower decks
In post 27, Raya36 wrote:I find it interesting how Holden places an omgus vote on Votato. Then when two votes are placed (one for Holden, one for Votato) he engages with the player who voted for Votato
crew mate Raya! i get if you're trying to move us out of RVS but this isIn post 29, Raya36 wrote:I get that conclusion from votato stating that there can be only one majestic equine then voting you. You're wording suggests intent to get a wagon on votato and the only reason for choosing votato seems to be him voting for you. Omgus is still omgus even if it's in rvs and banter. Then you engage with the player who votes votato as well and I also sense a light attempt at buddying this player.veryreachy - you're talking about the 3rd and 5th posts in the game
i thought it was clear Holden's vote doesn't mean anything alignment indicative so him choosing to engage with someone that isn't where his vote is placed means nothing
i will assign 1 WtP (Walk the Plank) to Raya
~Eve- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I think I TR EeveeIn post 71, Eevee wrote:i like the donkey sheriff but i may just be charmed by his pirate speak
Mohab's questions about the setup in 9 look more for show and i don't get why she unvoted in 51 - why did you? also i'd argue early wagons aren't pointless but that's not an alignment-indicative discussion to have
1 High Seas goes to Holden
1 Walk the Plank goes to Mohab
VOTE: Mohab
~Eve- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Yes. It stood out to me most in the rvs phase thoughIn post 78, Eevee wrote:
sure but are you now claiming that was your original intention rather than actually thinking it was suspicious from Holden?In post 74, Raya36 wrote:Reachy yes, but did we not get out of rvs?
~Eve- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Welcome to the game Umlaut!
Why isnt porkens great?In post 94, Umlaut wrote:First impressions based on basically nothing:- Holden town
- Eevee town
- Raya town
- Chemist kinda town
- Porkens not so great
- Mohab either
- everyone else needs to do more
Idk if I can help clear anything up because ya know, wifom. My initial rvs vote on you was just for voting votato back. Not a big deal in rvs. But then when you supported porkens for voting votato as well and then invited others to join in the wagon I saw it as a good opportunity to call you out and get the game goingIn post 107, HoldenGolden wrote:
Arg let me dumb down the pirate talk fer clarity sake.In post 105, Eevee wrote:Pedit: is that a good point pirate donkey sherrif? Raya bringing that point up doesn't mean she's scum since it sounds valid and means - wait do you mean suboptimal or optimal plan? if you propose optimal plans as scum then she's right to point out it's NAI and that does the same thing of getting us out of RVS
i suppose her route was one that requires more substance than a meta read which would be easy to make for scum but it wouldn't be a scummy one to make
The plan I purposed there was worded to sound pro-town even though it was advocating what is normally suboptimal play in lovers mafia (I was voicing to delay claiming the pairs until halfway through the phase to get "more info out of reactions to the pair claims").
My stance on the matter is that she's townish, or at the very least telling the truth about wanting to force the game pass rvs. While it's true scum!ray could of pointed it out in a NAI way, I think scum ray could of very easily turned it into an opportunity to actually push me/actively discredit me. The total lack of mentioning it sticks out, and I'm struggling to see why scum!ray would ignore it knowing what she knows.
Spoiler: rambling over NAI call out
Slight townlean on snowblaze. I find scum tend not to open with a pile of reads.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
That's a good pointIn post 131, HoldenGolden wrote:
I mean not really since it's over what you havent done.In post 127, Raya36 wrote:Idk if I can help clear anything up because ya know, wifom. My initial rvs vote on you was just for voting votato back. Not a big deal in rvs. But then when you supported porkens for voting votato as well and then invited others to join in the wagon I saw it as a good opportunity to call you out and get the game going
Slight townlean on snowblaze. I find scum tend not to open with a pile of reads.
I also disagree on snowblaze and actuallyFoSthe readlist. I found most of the reads (pork, Ulmant, mohab, craig) non-committal or providing reasons to not fully trust in it (ulmant on chem for example). The only 3 committed reads there are a townlean on me and eevee and a town ping on you.
Snowblaze, do you think you could explain some of your reads?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Yeah, 100%, but he is TOOOOOO scummy to be scumIn post 157, Umlaut wrote:
Even though I know this is a discredited concept I'm having trouble disagreeing.In post 155, Raya36 wrote:Craig is too scummy to be scum- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'm actually very confused about Craig right now. If they are town it almost feels like they're gamethrowing. It's quite important to get a scum lynch D1 or D2. So I don't understand as town why they're playing like this and drawing votes.
But a similar thing can be said for scum. It's important they don't get lynched D1 or D2 so as scum why would you want to draw this attention to yourself.
It's all wifom but I don't see this being pro-any alignment.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Probably at least 1 is pushing you and probably the rest are ignoring or null on you. Maybe a light townreadIn post 205, Craig Pelton wrote:Question for everyone: if I’m town, what do you think scum is doing right now?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Why would scum!Porken say he's really excited if he doesnt like his role though.In post 221, Eevee wrote:I don't really like the Pork replace out, mostly he said he was really excited about playing earlier. I also have intel that Porkens might not like scum very much.
~Eva- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Could you explain what it was then?In post 251, Menalque wrote:
Eh, not exactly a reaction test but sureIn post 244, Raya36 wrote:It made it clear that it was all a reaction test and I really don't think scum would start the game by trying to pull that off when the stakes are high- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Going back on what you saidIn post 320, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
What is "backpedaled"?In post 319, Raya36 wrote:I think Fredrick is ok. No slip there. Unless he backpedaled hard and successfully- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Because nothing happening is catching my interest and a wagon is a good way to make something happenIn post 471, HoldenGolden wrote:
Why are you committing to sheeping a wagon without knowing the reason it exists?In post 460, Raya36 wrote:I'm 100% sheeping for a wagon rn. I was asked to join last page. Still waiting for an explanation
Catching up after shower. Just saw this when skimming for context.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Ok I'll help.In post 482, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I'll give it some time to ferment.In post 480, Mohab500 wrote:What's the point of that vote Fredrick? am I missing something? going to explain?
Why are you voting me?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Oh ok. Why are you voting SS thenIn post 484, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I'm not.In post 483, Raya36 wrote:
Ok I'll help.In post 482, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I'll give it some time to ferment.In post 480, Mohab500 wrote:What's the point of that vote Fredrick? am I missing something? going to explain?
Why are you voting me?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Me trying to re-engage myselfIn post 496, Menalque wrote:In post 319, Raya36 wrote:I think Fredrick is ok. No slip there. Unless he backpedaled hard and successfully
What was going on here, raya?In post 443, Raya36 wrote:Sorry guys, was really not engaged with this game yet and discouraged when I came in and couldn't find anything to comment on.
VOTE: Fredrick
Going to start off again with this- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Sorry about the short catch up. Hurt my hand, sucks to type.
Thought it might go somewhere. It did not.In post 516, Menalque wrote:
Okay but like why did you vote fredrick to do so?In post 515, Raya36 wrote:
Me trying to re-engage myselfIn post 496, Menalque wrote:In post 319, Raya36 wrote:I think Fredrick is ok. No slip there. Unless he backpedaled hard and successfully
What was going on here, raya?In post 443, Raya36 wrote:Sorry guys, was really not engaged with this game yet and discouraged when I came in and couldn't find anything to comment on.
VOTE: Fredrick
Going to start off again with this
I agree with your reasoning and I can definitely see that. On a reread of her iso I'm not getting a strong solvey feel.In post 518, HoldenGolden wrote:
What do you think of my snow vote.In post 515, Raya36 wrote:
Me trying to re-engage myselfIn post 496, Menalque wrote:In post 319, Raya36 wrote:I think Fredrick is ok. No slip there. Unless he backpedaled hard and successfully
What was going on here, raya?In post 443, Raya36 wrote:Sorry guys, was really not engaged with this game yet and discouraged when I came in and couldn't find anything to comment on.
VOTE: Fredrick
Going to start off again with this
Engage with me
That said I think this reasoning is true:
Snow, why can't scum fake that townslip. I see that all the time or scum asking the mod if there's daytalk for exampleIn post 530, Snowblaze wrote:Is this because of Holden’s post, or because I haven’t posted in a while?
@Holden, if you must try and get me killed, you could at least spell my name right. Anyway: my original vote on Fredrick was more a gut ping than anything else. It’s kind of hard to put it into words, especially a few days later, but I thought he was just opportunistically hopping on wagons.
I unvoted because I thought his remark on scum not having daytalk was a townslip after finding out that scum did have daytalk. Probably should have made that slightly clearer.
As for my post with the RCE vote, that’s probably because I didn’t really have any scumreads (still don’t, I guess). And it wasn’t “why everyone else can’t be scum” it was more “why I don’t want to vote for other people”.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This is actually suspicious. "Who on your wagon is scum?" then she says the counterwagon lolIn post 606, Snowblaze wrote:Yeah. I’m trying. I was just going to point out that RCE’s vote on me is ringing all kinds of alarm bells.
“I vaguely remember not liking this wagon, and I think other people have done scummy stuff, but I’m fine with eliminating this anyway, we can worry about other stuff tomorrow”.
That just screams “scum trying to push a miselimination through while simultaneously distancing from it” to me.
Other than that, in general I feel like scum are on the latter half of my wagon rather than the early part. I’ll see if I can find what I particularly don’t like.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This is a really good post.In post 542, Almost50 wrote:
Because he didn't receive a red PM and didn't even read the rules thoroughly?? I mean, the rules explicitly state:In post 535, Eevee wrote:Almo what do you think of my reasoning here and why does town!RCE make that post?
There is no mention of "majority" here, so RCE didn't read that (and I'm sure the win con in the role PM is identical because it would be a mod discrepancy if they gave us something in public and something else to scum in private).In post 1, northsidegal wrote:The Mafia win when all living members escape.
Now let's discuss the possibilities: 2 Scum Eliminations on D1/D2 = Scum instant loss
1 Scum Elimination on D1/D2 and they canNOT have a "majority" escaping because NO ONE will escape by the end of D2.
No Scum Elimination on D1/D2 = still can't win by the "start" of D3 because only one scum would escape by the end of D2 and they need to make it through D3 for a second one to escape (and that's EVEN if we assume -somehow- "majority" which I already said was a misconception)
So, RCE was wrong. Plain and simple.
Now let me ask you this: What is the SCUM motive behind this post, given scum daychat is also announced in the rules. If RCE had doubts or was unclear about the rule (which -again- is not possible from my PoV given it's an explicit win con statement) why wouldn't he have asked in the scum PT?
UNVOTE: RCE
There isn't any scum motivation for that post unless they were doing it for us to think they're town for that reason. But if so it clearly backfired on them.
VOTE: EeveeeIn post 547, Eevee wrote:no Almo you don't follow me
RCEngima tried to give the impression he didn't want scum to realise they could kill each other if they hadn't already, and asked a question privately to the mod
but if that's the case, he shouldn't be making that post in the first place since it could possibly alert scum that they can kill each other
the scuminess of that post has nothing to do with the act of misunderstanding the rules - it has everything to do with the intent of the post and the disconnect betweent the thought process behind it and the actual act of making and posting it
you ask for scum motivation? there doesn't need to be aspecificmotivation for that post - the scum motivation for any post like that is to give out content and get yourself not scumread
you and RCE aren't invited to perform for the play - you can still have tickets to view it though
VOTE: RCEnigma
~Eve
Seems they're just trying to find a reason to push RCE now (says we need to look at the intent but the only intent that makes sense is town intent), and then they say A50 looks bad too for disagreeing.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Yeah I saw that giant wallpost about RCE from her after. You're right that it's not a cop-out.In post 633, Something_Smart wrote:
But she has actual reasoning for it, so it's not a cop-out. And like I pointed out before, she's right that RCE's vote did look bad.In post 631, Raya36 wrote:This is actually suspicious. "Who on your wagon is scum?" then she says the counterwagon lol
I don't want a snow lynch. I'd be ok with RCE since my only reason for townreading is that whole scum killing scum thing that I don't think scum would talk about in thread.
I'd like Eevee but I don't think that would be popular.
I'm not against Mohab.
VOTE: Mohab
I don't think Eevee is gonna happen and if Mohab does flip scum that would be very telling in that regard- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I believe Snowblaze's post that I quoted and she stepped it up with that read list and the new burst of effort. I also believe that she will participate much more now based on the reads and the effort shown there and the lack of participation and solving was my main problem originally.In post 636, Menalque wrote:Why don’t you want a snow lynch Raya? Or more to the point, why do you think snow isn’t scum?- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Snow is viable as well but I don't want her lynched because I think she is townIn post 637, Menalque wrote:
This is vaguely disingenuous given that Snow is also at G-3In post 635, Raya36 wrote:That's E-3 for Mohab and 15 hours until deadline- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
That's true but I was just pointing out that I brought Mohab to E-3 but you're right, I should've pointed out snow tooIn post 640, Menalque wrote:
Yes but by presenting only mohab it makes her seem like she’s the only person viable to anyone coming into the thread late, when that’s not the situation. Despite your reads you should present the information honestly so that we can see what people chose to do between the two of them on later days with all the information in front of themIn post 639, Raya36 wrote:
Snow is viable as well but I don't want her lynched because I think she is townIn post 637, Menalque wrote:
This is vaguely disingenuous given that Snow is also at G-3In post 635, Raya36 wrote:That's E-3 for Mohab and 15 hours until deadline
I really wish we weren’t deadline guillotining- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
530In post 645, Menalque wrote:
Which post, you quoted two?In post 638, Raya36 wrote:
I believe Snowblaze's post that I quoted and she stepped it up with that read list and the new burst of effort. I also believe that she will participate much more now based on the reads and the effort shown there and the lack of participation and solving was my main problem originally.In post 636, Menalque wrote:Why don’t you want a snow lynch Raya? Or more to the point, why do you think snow isn’t scum?
And why does snow making an effort at threat of being lynched make her townie vs her lack of solving earlier?
Also why is effort townie? Snow made walls and tried in her scumgames on site and meta is basically the only reason to TR someone or SR someone for effort
I think that's genuine and I think she's actually trying to get into the game. Maybe I'm being a bit too forgiving for lack of effort since I'm struggling to get into the game myself. The effort could be trying to get off the chopping block but with the time left before a lynch has to be made and being the most likely to get lynched all that effort wouldn't be likely to save her and would only be info for town if she flips scum.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
This is a good point about Mohab as well. Could be an attempt at a fake townslip?In post 687, Umlaut wrote:I know we've beaten this particular horse a lot already but I think there may still be some life in it.
This is aIn post 124, Mohab500 wrote:I am gonna ask a really dumb question but, can there be power roles in this game?veryweird question for a townie to be asking, because it's effectively a VT claim on page 5. (Yes everyone is a VT, but if town!Mohab is genuinely asking this question it means she doesn't know that, so she's making a substantial claim.) A townie who is actually confused on this point ought to, if not read the setup (because who does that?), then PM the mod. That's another reason to think the question isn't genuine.
It is an I direct way to claim VT though which could make it possible from scum.In post 688, Menalque wrote:I think you're confusing what town "should" do with what town "do" do. Because a lot of the time if I'm unsure of something I'll just sling it in the thread for clarification. I understand the paranoia around mohab seeming to have intentionally townslipped, but I just don't think scum actually very often decide to fake townships, and also it hasn't worked at all because people are so sceptical given the nature of the townslip? Like if you're focusing on townslips being faked, I think fredrick's is more likely because that's so much more plausible as a thing to not be sure of. Like mohab fake slipping a lack of knowledge about whether there are PRs just isn't even an effective way to fake townslip.
I really don't think the Snowblaze wagon is the right one. I'm just not feeling her buckle under pressure or act differently than I'd expect. The wagon almost feels forced? This is based on playing with her in the past and also what Eve said about her scum meta. Doesn't feel like what she described. My only concern is the frustration for some reason feels forced and fake. But the rest still stands more string pointing towards town!snow
I don't think I understand where the titus wagon is coming from?
Not sure how I feel about Montosh yet. I get they're catching up but the posting isn't anything I'd ever read through so to me I assume busywork. I need to see more.
I definitely still want the mohab slot lynched. Mae makes this really long post and says they have a problem with the Snow wagon yet then says that Snow is scum and votes there. Really seems like Mae forcing a scumread on the counter wagon. Stating her scum meta indirectly while being sure to not do that and instead use it against snow. All looks bad- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Oh you're right. I missed the snow voteIn post 886, Umlaut wrote:
Actually it looks like they’re both at -1 assuming the last VC was correct. And I’m holding the hammer, fun.Raya36 wrote:Mae is at E-1 just so everyone knows
Snow is E-2
Probably still going to just go with Maemuki here but I disliked Titus’ earlier vote enough that it gives me pause in joining back in on that wagon.
I feel like there's a good chance of Mae flipping scum? That post voting Snow was just not a town post and when I was reading it all I could see was scum motivation- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
I'm just bad at reading when I'm tired. SorryIn post 931, Titus wrote:
It's the word again. It implies repeated malfeasance rather than innocent error. It's very side angle at Raya being scum aka shading Raya.In post 906, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
I don't quite get what you meant about the tone now that I've seen that it was misinformation.In post 902, Titus wrote:The tone of this is yuck.
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Why are you already pre-defending yourself?In post 951, Menalque wrote:I guess if there’s anything that’s town indicative that I think should be looked at it’s that I really didn’t push the snow wagon that hard compared to what I could have done, and scum!me tends towards extremes. So if I was trying to defend a buddy from the lynch I probably would have doubled down harder on the push against snow
Aware that this isn’t helpful as it’s self-meta but I wonder if eevee or Titus who are more aware of me as a player might know that about me- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
But wouldn't it make more sense to let someone find that for themselves instead of jumping in with a self defense?In post 961, Menalque wrote:
...because I’m aware of how awful I look based on D1 because I’m not an idiot?In post 960, Raya36 wrote:
Why are you already pre-defending yourself?In post 951, Menalque wrote:I guess if there’s anything that’s town indicative that I think should be looked at it’s that I really didn’t push the snow wagon that hard compared to what I could have done, and scum!me tends towards extremes. So if I was trying to defend a buddy from the lynch I probably would have doubled down harder on the push against snow
Aware that this isn’t helpful as it’s self-meta but I wonder if eevee or Titus who are more aware of me as a player might know that about me- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
The stakes are much much higher for scum right now. You even said something about not being all that upset about being mis-eliminated I believe? It doesnt make sense to me to jump in with a self-defence. It's much more advantageous to give people a chance to come to that conclusion without your help because by being the one stating it about yourself causes it to lose credit. Then there's extra added wifom about you being the one saying it. It's also overdefensive in my opinion.In post 968, Menalque wrote:
What’s the advantage in doing that regardless of my alignment? If I’m town, then I know that the thing I would have done differently is I would have probably tried harder to save my scumbuddy (given the importance of not losing to a double guillo on D1 followed by D2) and counted on the WIFOM of “would mena really tried this hard to save their scumbuddy???” to try and save myself on D2, ad given that I know this is what’s different about how I’d approach this as scum I might as well share that. If I’m scum, then obviously I chose to play it that way but I’d have come up with an explanation overnight for why I acted that way that I might as well share.In post 964, Raya36 wrote:
But wouldn't it make more sense to let someone find that for themselves instead of jumping in with a self defense?In post 961, Menalque wrote:
...because I’m aware of how awful I look based on D1 because I’m not an idiot?In post 960, Raya36 wrote:
Why are you already pre-defending yourself?In post 951, Menalque wrote:I guess if there’s anything that’s town indicative that I think should be looked at it’s that I really didn’t push the snow wagon that hard compared to what I could have done, and scum!me tends towards extremes. So if I was trying to defend a buddy from the lynch I probably would have doubled down harder on the push against snow
Aware that this isn’t helpful as it’s self-meta but I wonder if eevee or Titus who are more aware of me as a player might know that about me
In either case there’s also a strong motivation to not be guillo’d today in that if I’m town it means we can’t insta-win, whereas if I’m scum it’s an insta-loss.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
If you are town I would agree that this is probably correctIn post 971, Menalque wrote:
Yeah, this oneIn post 747, Menalque wrote:Fmpov, the issue is this: if snow is town, why are scum so committed to seeing her go through? Because I don’t think anyone else has been advocating that much for a snow!guillo other than me, and I know that I’m town and this is a town push on her. Whereas mohab very much only came up after the RCE wagon attempt had fallen apart
So if snow is town and mohab is scum, why aren’t the actual scum doing anything to resist mohab!flip or to back my snow push? Unless they’re entirely counting on my snow push as a defence of mohab, but that seems unlikely given that I can always change my mind and that putting all your eggs into the “letting a townie defend our scumbuddy” feels like a scumteam ceding far to much ground to be plausible
So with this knowledge, I now think this is exactly what was happening on D1 and I think I dismissed it too quickly- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Ok I'm willing to agree to disagree and try to work out who is scum then if you really are townIn post 975, Menalque wrote:
Yes, they are, and it’s why I’m not going to fight my mis-guillotine if it comes, although obviously I’m still going to try to avoid it by making it as clear as possible that I’m town who was just ass-backward on D1.In post 972, Raya36 wrote:The stakes are much much higher for scum right now. You even said something about not being all that upset about being mis-eliminated I believe? It doesnt make sense to me to jump in with a self-defence. It's much more advantageous to give people a chance to come to that conclusion without your help because by being the one stating it about yourself causes it to lose credit. Then there's extra added wifom about you being the one saying it. It's also overdefensive in my opinion.
I think we just disagree here Raya tbh. I don’t think that because something is self-meta it’s inherently less valid if people know that it’s true, and I think it’s fairly obvious I’d be trying to avoid being the guillotine today as either alignment, I’d just fight it harder as scum. - Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36
- Raya36