Ehhh I don't have this vibe there are lots of people middling who are decent scumspectsIn post 1677, Gentleman 5 wrote:This game is challenging, there are a lot of people who feel like town
I get your "posting on your kind" shtick but I also always question the motivation of these kinds of posts
I would as much as reads on any other playerIn post 1693, Lady 1 wrote:Food for thought: How much are you willing to trust someone else's read on their own partner?
I don't really value my partner that much here and I wonder why some people do (aside from the PT)
I probably won't be talking to G2 much
I don't really have an opinion on that post but I am concerned about Gent 3 in general. Ever since that early "I only take down people I townread the least" thing his posting has irked me and I haven't been able to put a finger on it. Maybe its the length?In post 1704, Lady 1 wrote:Nothing in 1689 is town indicative and It makes me feel even more confident in the way people are reading gent 3. It's worrisome.In post 1701, Lady 3 wrote:1689 is true, town-indicative, and depressing and I would like to Disable it
Yeah I haven't forgotten about youIn post 1740, Lady 2 wrote:I like this guy.In post 1689, Gentleman 3 wrote:A few thoughts on this. The first: this accusation could be made about any replacement, even ones who claim that they weren't following along. Do you have any specific reason to believe that it is the case when it comes to me? If not, do you hold the same reservations about the other replacements?In post 1642, Gentleman 8 wrote:i don't think he wrote his posts before replacing in, i think he was following along closely enough that he had genuine reads prior to replacing in (and he just happened to write about them, regardless of his alignment)In post 1639, Gentleman 5 wrote:I don't think the "he wrote his posts before entering the game" theory is a real good one
he said he was following it. he claims he wasn't forming reads though, he was just trying to identify people. i don't entirely believe that, but it's why i don't care about his replace in so much as how he's going to form reads down the line
Second: I think we would both agree that it's not readsthemselvesthat people are read off of. How one forms reads, how one justifies them, and in general how one talksabouttheir reads generally, I would say, make up the content by which someone is judged. With that in mind, if you agree that the idea that I wrote posts before replacing in is absurd, wouldn't you agree that the concern that I had reads before I replaced in is superseded by the things I've writtensurroundingthose reads afterwards? And of course, that's not to mention the more real-time interactions I've had with people.
I don't know. I'm reminded in some sense of a concern that I believe Lady 3 brought up, that people who "appear competent" might secretly have great scum ranges. I've experienced that exact paranoia myself before in a previous game, and I had to overcome it before I could move forward and town would eventually win. I don't think the concern isunfounded, although I would say that in the current site-meta it's on the less probable side. To my knowledge, at least, there are few players currently playing known for their outstanding scum games. I won't bother to comment on what I think of my own ability as scum; if someone doesn't trust me, they wouldn't believe me anyways.
Posts like these keep up my SR on you
Isn't this a classic scumtell?In post 1757, Lady 3 wrote:Why is it obvious I'm town?