[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12102811 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Rata Mall - Fashion Store 4 - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #2 (isolation #0) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:24 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
What the fuck.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #4 (isolation #1) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:25 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
backs against wall with pitchfork at the ready
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #5 (isolation #2) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:26 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
What the fuck.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #7 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:26 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
drop pitchfork
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #8 (isolation #4) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:27 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
put sleeves down?
I don’t know what that means.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #11 (isolation #5) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:30 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Well I have a suit on. The sleeves don’t roll up.
takes jacket off, then rolls up sleeves on the button down shirt, which goes up to his elbows
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #12 (isolation #6) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:30 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
If you want any more skin, I’ll have to do a striptease.
wiggles eyebrows
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #14 (isolation #7) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:32 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
flexes, because I’m not without my vanity
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #15 (isolation #8) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:35 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
So. Did you kill the first thief down there?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #17 (isolation #9) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:38 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
I knew you weren’t a crazy person.
More like what’s going on down there.
picks up pitchfork
Out lovey thief number two who has hidden herself away says that the first thief’s charted body is down in that laundry chute.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #19 (isolation #10) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:39 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Charred, that is.
All this excitement and adrenaline has got me excited.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #20 (isolation #11) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:39 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Yes. He stole from me, which he admitted to. That addict.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #21 (isolation #12) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:40 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Wait a second.
laughs
Are you looking for an old person too? Or perhaps someone who should be old but might be disguised?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #22 (isolation #13) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:41 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Also, how’d you get down in that place below?
So exciting. Such questions. How delightful.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #24 (isolation #14) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:45 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Haha haha.
So there is a CLONING DEVICE down there?
The little scamp failed to mention that.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #25 (isolation #15) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:46 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
So you’ve been down there this whole time? You got there from the eatery?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #26 (isolation #16) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:47 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Also while we talk, I’m going to work
keep looking around for a roller cart or stand to use with the safe
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #28 (isolation #17) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:51 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Me? I’m trying to reclaim my rightful claim to being a wonderful mall host.
These folks sound pretty dreadful. They might be the assholes who are using the security cameras. Happy to help you root them out.
Also, tell me more about any ways in which I can identify a clone. I’ve seen some interesting things about some folks here.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #30 (isolation #18) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:54 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
see if I can move the safe with my feet
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #32 (isolation #19) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 12:57 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
help is in low supply, so see if pushing it with the end of my pitchfork helps with leverage
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #33 (isolation #20) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 1:00 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
trying to push this out to the eatery, but will put on edge of store until we return
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #37 (isolation #21) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 1:26 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Oh, I’m just curious to see what’s in it and I’m going to force break the 4-digit code. I got up to 0500.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #38 (isolation #22) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 1:27 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do with this $300? Are you buying my silence?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #39 (isolation #23) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 1:40 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
So if you’ve got yourself a gun, why not just bring this all up when we were together?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #41 (isolation #24) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:07 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
No. The safe is just a thing to play with.
A rechargeable gun? Now that is interesting.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #43 (isolation #25) » Fri Sep 04, 2020 4:12 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
try to think hard to discern what kind of noise it was
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #46 (isolation #26) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 2:17 am
Postby Green Crayons »
I certainly hope tattoos don’t cover up the glow.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #47 (isolation #27) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 2:50 am
Postby Green Crayons »
Oh by the by. What was the passcode to get from the cafe into that room below?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #50 (isolation #28) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 10:22 am
Postby Green Crayons »
Oh so we have quantum portals here too.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #51 (isolation #29) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 10:22 am
Postby Green Crayons »
look around for where the donut appeared from
Inspect donut
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #53 (isolation #30) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:45 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
Oh so you visited the bakery after all did you?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #54 (isolation #31) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:46 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
goes back to pushing the safe to near the exit by the eatery, and continue punching in my numbers[/b{
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Post
Post #56 (isolation #32) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 4:40 pm
Postby Green Crayons »
<Oh I assumed there was clearance at foot level.>
Mind helping me lift this over the counter?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
