Yup, I think the trials are going to affect roles
VOTE: Titus
Yup, I think the trials are going to affect roles
VOTE: BMIn post 20, Battle Mage wrote:big balls Mage here, volunteering to do the first trial.
Vote: Battle Mage
In post 27, Battle Mage wrote:why you fretting about whether trials are public or private though? scummy dude, only scum have something to hide
In post 28, Battle Mage wrote:maybe you wanted to consult your scumbuddies in the trial for some inspiration haha
LolIn post 29, pob long wrote:what the heck
At first i think your reactions were reasonable but this is a little scummierIn post 36, pob long wrote:this is getting Ridiculous guy. . . .In post 35, Battle Mage wrote:yo gypyx, DGB, get on board!
Okay. That's hilariousIn post 75, Princess Leia wrote:I like this. Position of the 0 shows it was a conscious decision to write her name out again, but the way it shifts shows he's not as serious as he's letting on.
I'm with pob on this one. Quickhammer? What?In post 80, pob long wrote:where is the quickhammer?In post 70, shellyc wrote:I can definitely see taylor / nos there trying to quickhammer
i don't like 45 at all
Nah mate I too have a kneejerk negative reaction to people joking about being scum and/or self-voting. Don't think this tell is accurateIn post 67, RedPanda wrote:In post 23, Nosferatu wrote:i mean if he feels up to the task why should we take that from him?In post 21, Gypyx wrote:Don't self-vote please
VOTE: battle mageIn post 45, Tayl0r Swift wrote:shelly crayon-lover?In post 41, shellyc wrote:nah I didn't say I could be a CL, I was pointing out that the c caused much confusion and I should get an alt :)
continuing with this logic it could start with anything beginning with c.
VOTE: BM are you confident you can pass the trial?
hm, i assumed we wouldn't want town to go to trial, even it is ourselvesIn post 91, RedPanda wrote:This game is different though. There is incentive for town to want to go to trial but there is no incentive for town to want town to go to trial.In post 86, Fidget wrote:Nah mate I too have a kneejerk negative reaction to people joking about being scum and/or self-voting. Don't think this tell is accurate
That doesn't explain why he misspelled it in the first place. why is scum more likely to go back and correct it?In post 103, Princess Leia wrote:Because moving the 0 is a calculated decision and scum are usually more intentional with their posting?In post 99, Gypyx wrote:I don't get your read; if you really want to overanalyse it i'd say it's slightly scum indicative
In post 125, shellyc wrote:I like Leia's posting mindset - the right amount of town paranoia
In post 113, Princess Leia wrote:Why is your signature "bottom text", Gypyx? I'd get if it was something interesting or linked to previous games like shellyChandelier is doing, but having it just as that makes me think you're trying to distract us from reading your posts, because you're afraid the stuff you're saying will look suspicious.
In post 116, Princess Leia wrote:And now you're showing a mindset where you expect to be alive at ExoLo and have a (big) ((scum?)) reveal. I want you to explain the bottom text now rather than reveal it later.
In post 121, Princess Leia wrote:shelly, why are you at the bottom of this votecount?In post 112, Not Known 15 wrote:
does this come off as genuine paranoia to you, shelly?In post 122, Princess Leia wrote:Gypyx, you make me feel uneasy. The way you're talking makes me feel like you're laughing behind my back while keeping up a straight face while speaking to me. It's really unnerving.
Okay then. Has anything leia said on this page seemed genuine to you?In post 173, shellyc wrote:it does.In post 135, Fidget wrote:does this come off as genuine paranoia to you, shelly?
Also bumping this for shelly, I am very interested in an elaboration of 126In post 175, Fidget wrote:Okay then. Has anything leia said onthis pagethe last page seemed genuine to you?
In post 137, Gypyx wrote:Cornered on what lmao, this whole conversation had no link to the gameIn post 126, shellyc wrote:Gypyx's responses give me the vibe of scum being cornered tbh
Confused.In post 177, Titus wrote:Fidget, what's your Leia read?
Tempted to vote because she really is just making up stuff on tayl0r at this point which I could potentially see as a "Don't vote me, vote them!" dishonest kind of reaction from scum.In post 206, Princess Leia wrote:Also, her running away when I proposed my real-time question test is scum-indicative. Town are more likely to see it as opportunity to show their worth, while scum will think of it as a "ugh, I can't be bothered with this" and disappear instead.
He's pretty good at scum. I would have awarded townpoints earlier otherwise.In post 227, Gypyx wrote:Also, missed that post, you consider battle game as a weak scum? (I mean, i don't really know the guy, but he looks experienced at least)In post 184, RedPanda wrote: I don't think we're disagreeing. I just don't see a weak scum player making that move.
I agree that Tayl0r isn't town yet but that Leia's arguments are as a whole are very ridiculous.In post 236, Battle Mage wrote:I think that's all completely ridiculous and doesn't imply anything. I'm quite prepared to buy Taylor as scum, but that argument is so weak and contrived it makes me more interested in you. :facepalm:In post 210, Princess Leia wrote:In post 162, Princess Leia wrote:Can we do a real time interaction test? I want to test your speed. I'll give you a question and I want to see how fast you can answer it.In post 163, Princess Leia wrote:RUNNIng MAWYyThe fourth post was 40 seconds after her post. We were having a conversation and she'd just asked me a question, so it's natural that she refreshes to see my response, and I think it's extremely likely that she saw my followup but decided not to respond.In post 165, Princess Leia wrote:Are you ready to answer my question? I'll post it as soon as you post again.
In post 252, RedPanda wrote:You misunderstood. I just think 90% of scum players in this site are gutless and wouldn't make that move because there was a chance for it to backfire however small and a town player wouldn't care because of the additional wincon.
I think I see what you're saying but I don't think there was enough risk to deter scum who thinks they'll gain towncred from self-voting. I do like the odds of this being a genuine read thoughIn post 253, RedPanda wrote:I just don't see the reward of towncred which will evaporate as the game goes longer as enough incentive for scum to make that move.
Why does your VCA always implicate me? It's astounding to me that you've suspected me in every game we've ever played together, except for the one I was scum in.In post 315, Titus wrote:By the way, Fidget is lockscum. Taylor is town.
There was no "scumslip" at all. I was testing the fluidity of the wagons entirely. Fidget was sheeping scum based on wagon momentum before but this seals it.
I have no read on shelley but I know Fidget is scared.
Vecna is well Vecna.
VOTE: Fidget
Yeah no shit that's why I voted you. It seemed performative and has now led you to.. this conclusionIn post 315, Titus wrote:There was no "scumslip" at all.
I've never played with Titus where she was scum, I don't think. You do make a good point that she's following the pattern I guess.In post 320, Tayl0r Swift wrote:so does that mean you think titus is town because as town titus always falsely suspects you?In post 317, Fidget wrote:Why does your VCA always implicate me? It's astounding to me that you've suspected me in every game we've ever played together, except for the one I was scum in.In post 315, Titus wrote:By the way, Fidget is lockscum. Taylor is town.
There was no "scumslip" at all. I was testing the fluidity of the wagons entirely. Fidget was sheeping scum based on wagon momentum before but this seals it.
I have no read on shelley but I know Fidget is scared.
Vecna is well Vecna.
VOTE: Fidget
LMAOIn post 347, Battle Mage wrote:You mean informed about your slot? I don't even understand why you'd say this. :facepalm:In post 344, Pickaxe Pete wrote:277 comes from an informed perspective
Maybe. I suppose I associate scum with being a bit more graceful but yeah anyone can get away with anything if it comes off as townieIn post 349, Battle Mage wrote:haha dude, i point my ginger haphazardly at everyone (regardless of alignment) in most games, get on everyone's bad side, and very rarely get lunched. :lol:
Someone mentioned it in a game I was reading and then i looked over the game a bit for myself. Don't really remember whereIn post 373, shellyc wrote:Fidget where did you learn that I crushed town in Newbie 2019?
watIn post 384, DrippingGoofball wrote:I know I said you're town earlier, but this stinks of bus'ing.In post 323, Fidget wrote:I've never played with Titus where she was scum, I don't think. You do make a good point that she's following the pattern I guess.
It mostly means I'm getting irritated for no reason though.
Well it was conveniently never about shelly herself, it was made to test ME the whole time.In post 385, DrippingGoofball wrote:An actual good point being made.In post 334, Marashu wrote:That said, when I saw it, it was meant to gauge the towniness/scuminess of the person being targeted, so it strikes me as weird to do this to someone who is V/LA, or at least not waiting that it was fabricated until the person got back to see if she got nervous.
She had a sneaking suspicion the whole time that I was scum sheeping wagons, apparently. Why she tacks "scum" onto there, I have no idea. Shelly seems to be unimportantIn post 315, Titus wrote:Fidget was sheeping scum based on wagon momentum before but this seals it.
I have no read on shelley but I know Fidget is scared.
Vecna is well Vecna.
Here's the actual point I was trying to make, sorry abt that.In post 387, Fidget wrote:Well it was conveniently never about shelly herself, it was made to test ME the whole time.In post 385, DrippingGoofball wrote:An actual good point being made.In post 334, Marashu wrote:That said, when I saw it, it was meant to gauge the towniness/scuminess of the person being targeted, so it strikes me as weird to do this to someone who is V/LA, or at least not waiting that it was fabricated until the person got back to see if she got nervous.
She had a sneaking suspicion the whole time that I was scum sheeping wagons, apparently. Why she tacks "scum" onto there, I have no idea. Shelly seems to be unimportant
.
So overall Titus has made a grand show of how she used her very deceptive and subtle tactics to catch the terrified Fidget red-handed (Does not apply to Vecna because he is Vecna). It's incredibly hard for me to believe this was a test she actually thought would work.
I'm sorry I didn't mean for it to come off like accusing you of having a personal vendetta.In post 391, Titus wrote:In post 317, Fidget wrote:Why does your VCA always implicate me? It's astounding to me that you've suspected me in every game we've ever played together, except for the one I was scum in.In post 315, Titus wrote:By the way, Fidget is lockscum. Taylor is town.
There was no "scumslip" at all. I was testing the fluidity of the wagons entirely. Fidget was sheeping scum based on wagon momentum before but this seals it.
I have no read on shelley but I know Fidget is scared.
Vecna is well Vecna.
VOTE: FidgetI hate this woe is me. You are acting like this is a personal vendetta when I have no idea who you are. You're clearly some sort of alt that I have no knowledge of your main. So if my methods always ping you then it's either a) you're scum or b) you play like it. You spend this rant as if you're speaking to town me too.
Through page 15. Not touching the Pickaxe Pete wagon based on who got on. Reevaluating the wagon conclusion based on the motions of new wagons.
I think Battle Mage is getting sheeped by scum for his invalid premise and a reaction by Pickaxe that is easy to jump on.
I have a tendency to respond poorly to being scumread. Sometimes I can sympathize with the reasoning after taking a break though. In this case, I cannot. I don't get it even slightly. I don't get how the test worked, I don't see what I was doing before the test, and you certainly haven't explained it past calling me lockscum for being "sheeping scum".In post 393, Titus wrote:Tldr reply to Fidget. I don't expect you to agree on a scumread of your slot ever. That's not the point. NAI you will argue it is wrong. So unless people actually care, I am not responding to 90% of that wall.
I don't know much about you, we've just played a few games together. My voting patterns set off your VCA alarms for whatever reason, I don't really know why.In post 396, Titus wrote:Well, if you were really familiar with me, you'd know that a) my VCA is just wagon momentum study until day 3 with a scum lynch. Lockscum means I would be willing to vote you for the rest of today.
My problem is you seem to act like we have extensive history but you don't know basic things about me, my VCA, or apparently my scum game.
I guess it's a playstyle clash that I just don't get and probably won't. Again I'm really sorry for flipping out about it.In post 399, Titus wrote:Well that's the thing about wagon analysis and VCA. It's not about context. It's merely about when the votes are placed. The only exceptions are things like guilties.In post 397, Fidget wrote:I have a tendency to respond poorly to being scumread. Sometimes I can sympathize with the reasoning after taking a break though. In this case, I cannot. I don't get it even slightly. I don't get how the test worked, I don't see what I was doing before the test, and you certainly haven't explained it past calling me lockscum for being "sheeping scum".In post 393, Titus wrote:Tldr reply to Fidget. I don't expect you to agree on a scumread of your slot ever. That's not the point. NAI you will argue it is wrong. So unless people actually care, I am not responding to 90% of that wall.
Maybe I took lockscum the wrong way.In post 402, Titus wrote:Well here's the thing. There's two other scum if I am right and three if I am wrong. A dialogue with you doesn't hurt town, whatever your alignment is. So despite the fact I would be down for voting you at anytime today, I am still going to hunt other scum and check my assumptions.
What seems odd about it to you? I would say the only "reconciliation" would be me softening on my stance that Titus' test is BS and therefore scummy. Now I'm just solid on the first part. I don't see any change in Titus' read of me.In post 405, Tayl0r Swift wrote:so titus and fidget were just distancing? this reconciliation reads really strange to me. but maybe thats just because its past bedtime.
See I'm with you on the first part. I'm just a bit shaken on whether or not this is more likely to come from scum!Titus. I have a sneaking suspicion people agree and don't vote because they are more acquainted to hearing this kind of thing from Titus, maybeIn post 390, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i dont see you being a baby. i dont see what titus claims to have seen. and i agree that this probably comes from scum!titus. and im not sure why so many people are either agreeing and not voting or not commenting on this at all.
Advice: yeah don't trust me. At least mine aren't worth itGypyx wrote:Catching up, and i see it's duel of the walls of text time, i'm not reading that
whatIn post 414, Gypyx wrote:Hmmmm i think figet's reaction to titus's reaction test feels like paranoia, i'd say scum!paranoia but not sure about this one
In post 277, shellyc wrote:I semi-forgot about this game.
I need to stop forgetting about stuff, can someone give me a tl;dr with the 6 new pages
also replacements don't just happen for inactivity, force-replacement is a way to solve a compromised slot but you're not supposed to discuss replacements anyways
Are we not going to talk about how Pete said that this post that sort of implies shellyc is informed about his slot being scum comes from an informed perspective? How is that a genuine town thought? Is he saying he's scum with shelly? Wha?In post 344, Pickaxe Pete wrote:277 comes from an informed perspective
I don't think "paranoia" means what you think it means. I don't think scum can be paranoid, not exactly anyway.In post 426, Gypyx wrote:Basically, paranoia generated by a scum mindset like, an "oh shit he's onto me" moment you see?In post 424, Marashu wrote:What does that mean? Wouldn't scum paranoia be fake paranoia? So, does it feel like paranoia or does it feel fake?In post 414, Gypyx wrote:Hmmmm i think figet's reaction to titus's reaction test feels like paranoia, i'd say scum!paranoia but not sure about this one
AgreeIn post 443, DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm nursing a game crush on Battle Mage.
But she just called me bad town and/or scum again!!!In post 448, DrippingGoofball wrote:Fidget, find your 'nads and help us find scum.
In post 377, Pickaxe Pete wrote:Why you are still developing initial impressions after 15 pages? Could it be because you're making them up as you go along?In post 370, shellyc wrote:VOTE: Pickaxe Pete
I hate the opening. Shading me opportunistically is super scummy. I don’t care if you call this OMGUS because I think shading me isn’t pro town at all at this point
I don’t think my listing of reads is fake and pointless. They are initial impressions and I’m still gutreading people atm
I had an initial impression (note the past tense). It was that you were scummy.
I have a current impression (note the present tense). It is that you are scum.
These are both just really semantic to me.In post 428, Pickaxe Pete wrote:How do you semi-forget? I can understand "kinda forgot" or something like that because that's a figure of speech, but "semi-forgot?" You need to up your scum game.In post 277, shellyc wrote:I semi-forgot about this game.
I need to stop forgetting about stuff, can someone give me a tl;dr with the 6 new pages
also replacements don't just happen for inactivity, force-replacement is a way to solve a compromised slot but you're not supposed to discuss replacements anyways
This is better I guessIn post 345, Pickaxe Pete wrote:This is fake and pointless. What is forced about Taylor's posting? What do you mean by weird flexes? What about pob long's posting confuses you?In post 279, shellyc wrote:initial impressions
plusjoy is probably scum here ;) like tbh this is a serious read, for 1) reasons I cant talk about and 2) town!plus does solve despite the solves might not being correct, plus is very agreeable here or am I just paranoid about you
don't like taylor's posting feels very forced
pob long is nullish scum to me, weird flexes and their posting confuses me
Re plusjoy: "I know something but can't talk about it, so trust me"
You already know what I think of this one. Makes no sense.In post 344, Pickaxe Pete wrote:277 comes from an informed perspective
Please Titus! I'll make you votecounts if you stop suspecting me!! I'm just so scared..In post 474, Titus wrote:Not sure. Both alignments grovel/beg. I'll take it because it means talking which is good for solving.
What are you even talking aboutIn post 490, shellyc wrote:don't try and use AtE now have a nice dayIn post 476, Fidget wrote:Please Titus! I'll make you votecounts if you stop suspecting me!! I'm just so scared..
What happened to the other 5 or so people you've thrown shade on?In post 488, shellyc wrote:too scummy to be scum isn't valid logic and taylor looks badIn post 429, Battle Mage wrote:If Pickaxe Pete flips scum, I'm still pretty interested in Tayl0r tomorrow, although in a funny way she's so erratic and inconsistent it feels too conspicuously bad to be scum. Also, completely happy getting the heat if he flips town. I don't really get a vibe that he is happy and enthusiastic to be here.
what if it's taylor / pickaxe / plusjoy here gg
I'm not even sure how to read shelly at this point, I'm not sure how a gut TR correlates with pocketing her and she doesn't explain it. And I don't think Titus' VCA gets townpoints for just being an attempt because clearly Titus does VCA consistentlyIn post 491, shellyc wrote:fidget is a gut TR (but might have me pocketed) and titus' VCA attempt is *wrong* but still an attempt so +townpoints
dripping goofball currently voteparking on me which is bleh but their entrance seemed pretty town
In post 520, Battle Mage wrote:my gut feels are saying Eddie Fenix is scum.
In post 521, Battle Mage wrote:looking at his ISO again, I'm pretty content sending him to trial today too.
Can I townblock anyone to make things slightly easier?
BM is already consensus town by this point but this progression is probably townyIn post 528, Battle Mage wrote:eh, just us currently. Maybe EddieFenix too. I just looked at 1 scumgame and 1 towngame, and he played much more townie than this in the scumgame, and similarly scummy to this in the towngame. Plus he has a tell which he did in the towngame and this one, but not in the scumgame.
Hence, begrudgingly, probs town here.
And Nos is town tooIn post 525, Nosferatu wrote:aren't we all vanilla what do they get keeping one or the other?
and major doubt that we have two scum wagons d1 lmfao
Did you not even believe in the wagon when you hammered it? Why would you get SR if you thought shelly was going to flip scum?
Hm yeah that's also true, maybe the task was unrelated and it just decided the amount of scum inside the gladiate.In post 628, Titus wrote:A good result could vary by number of scums in the gladiate without Shelley having control.In post 626, Vecna wrote:Like, based on the last few posts from shelly, if she did get a good result and she got to decide who would be fighting eachother, I bet pickaxe Pete wouldve been in there.
Maybe I should have read the thread first before giving thoughts but yes thisIn post 636, Gypyx wrote:I mean... 3 peeps to gladiate : 0 scum = horrible / 1 scum = failure / 2 scum = success / 3 scum = perfect
I find it really fitting tbh, and maybe scum has a say in the result
Lol what determined who were the "scummier townies"?In post 649, PlusJOYED wrote:I think its noserferatu since dgb's iso is horrid like mine
my guess is that shelly got a fail result and 2 townies (the scummier townies) were put in and 1 scum in solid standing
I am almost certain the bold is false. Does that change your opinion on Plus?In post 661, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i have provided a reason for a Nos scumread. and i think gut is a perfectly valid reason. Plus is kinda obvscum, but given the gladiate,In post 660, Titus wrote:Regardless of Nos alignment, you're still scummy to me. I don't know whether this is mislynch bravado or bussing but you have provided no articulable reason for a NOS fos.In post 659, Tayl0r Swift wrote:yesssssss
im glad to see people coming around on my nos read
VOTE: nos
What is your read on Plus joy? He was the major turning point against the PickAxe wagon. Your ignorance of him makes no sense.scum probably put plus there on purpose to bait us.Theres really not much content from plus other than always being on the leading wagon and then the hammer. I dont understand a town motivation for any of it, but I dont understand a scum motivation either. So im withholding judgement on plus for now. DGB seemed townie to me yesterday, which leaves Nos by PoE as well as on individual scumminess.
In post 477, PlusJOYED wrote:shit bros my mafia processing power is having trouble booting im in too many games
i do think pete is sus though UNVOTE:
VOTE: pete
In post 618, PlusJOYED wrote:jokes on you im trying to get put on trial town be damnedIn post 593, shellyc wrote:yes. PlusJoy is a stronger scumread to me atm with even less of a solving mindset / overall blendiness
guess I haven't done a good job if only you have voted me, how can I scumslip harder?
What the hell is this? What was the point of ending the day short on a wagon that your wording implies you don't even believe in? Why would you get SR for it?
In post 677, Marashu wrote:In post 662, Titus wrote:TS: Plus is obvscum, so he can't be scum. So let's vote the vocal townie out inside because of gut.
Me: Gut is not a valid reason. Town should vote out obvious scum. There's no evidence to support scum picking the gladiate.I agree that it's unlikely that scum picked the gladiate, but I disagree that shellyc picked the gladiate, largely because looking at shellyc's reads, she had plus and pete as partners, so the gladiate as her solve feels weird to me. I'm not sure how the gladiate was created, but it was probably the result of the trial. I just don't think it was the trial itself.In post 664, Fidget wrote:I'm guessing shelly picked out the gladiate, and the results of her trial is determined by how many scum she picked. 0 - horrible consequences for town and she loses, 1 - better, she doesn't lose and we got a chance, 2+ she wins on the spot and we get great odds.
Something like that.
Sure scum could have picked it too but that feels a lot less elegant of a game mechanic. Cause then there'd be obviously 2 town 1 scum gladiated and it just seems like it'd be messy to me.
Yeah I agree looking at it now. It wasn't shelly. If it was scum, they definitely had to put at least 1 member in. But I feel like having scum pick is kinda lame. Maybe there's a mystery behind it that can be solved?In post 687, Pickaxe Pete wrote:I don't think there's any way Shelly picked the gladiate without me in it.
In post 226, EddieFenix wrote:I'm not actually.... I'm -watching- Pob because there's somethings that give me some bad vibes. Which is why I am asking you to show me why you think he's a lock for being town.In post 131, Princess Leia wrote:You see what I'm seeing? You go first.In post 129, EddieFenix wrote:Reasons for Locktown on Pob, please.
What is bothering you about pob? I thought Battle Mage was decently town.In post 648, EddieFenix wrote:Very, very annoyed to come back to a quick lynch. I should have been in here on Monday, I take responsibility for not being in here. But, ok. Battle Mage was one of my reads that was off. However, I don't think this one is...
VOTE: Pob Long
What makes you think there's multiple scum in the gladiate? I would've guessed 1 exactly.In post 698, Titus wrote:I propose that if we hit scum, regardless of who we lynch, that we keep lynching in these 3 until we hit town or win lol.
Plus is the scummiest but if I were to be placed in a trial right now and forced to pick either DGB or Plus as scum, I'd probably pick DPG.In post 700, EddieFenix wrote:Look back to my Titus response for why I am thinking on DGB. Now, question, why do you have your vote on DGB? If PJ is potentially obv scum, why not vote? Like, I can understand if you consider them to be a jester a resistance, buuuuut..... Something don't sit right.
Like what the hell is this thought processIn post 663, Fidget wrote:Did you not even believe in the wagon when you hammered it? Why would you get SR if you thought shelly was going to flip scum?
Yea for real on the plusjoyed partIn post 722, Nosferatu wrote:yeah read up i think this is the wave VOTE: dgb
i lowkey feel like shelly got a horrible result,plusjoy has an outrageous iso that im insulted to believe comes from scum, and i honestly don't have that much of a scum read on dgb but i townread her less
You said it was VERY GOOD. You had to have adamantly agreed with it!In post 704, DrippingGoofball wrote:Like you, I was hell bent sure Shelly was lockscum so maybe there was confirmation bias.In post 684, Pickaxe Pete wrote:This post bothered me at the time because 1) I wasn't feeling Titus's VCA and 2) it seemed a little too complimentary from DGB.
I like himIn post 725, Tayl0r Swift wrote:fidget you have nos as town then? why?
I do quite like this post.In post 525, Nosferatu wrote:pls stop just saying logical fallacies like it means anything o/In post 490, shellyc wrote:don't try and use AtE now have a nice dayIn post 476, Fidget wrote:Please Titus! I'll make you votecounts if you stop suspecting me!! I'm just so scared..
aren't we all vanilla what do they get keeping one or the other?In post 496, Titus wrote:I agree with this.In post 485, shellyc wrote:this is close to a prodgeIn post 477, PlusJOYED wrote:shit bros my mafia processing power is having trouble booting im in too many games
i do think pete is sus though UNVOTE:
VOTE: pete
there's a noticable difference between town!plus and this read-sheeping which doesn't indicate a town mindset at all
If Plusjoy is scum, it suggests scum value you over Pickaxe Pete.
and major doubt that we have two scum wagons d1 lmfao
Would definitely like to talk about that. PlusJOY is acting very towny?In post 708, DrippingGoofball wrote:Other than a vote for Leia and whiteknighting Talylor Swift, Nosferatu's posts are mostly idle socializing, and even pretty weak sauce at that.
I'm town.
PlusJOY is acting very townie today.
VOTE: Nosferatu
Wait, so DPG's ISO is horrible but Nosferatu's isn't? What did you mean by "horrid"?In post 649, PlusJOYED wrote:I think its noserferatu since dgb's iso is horrid like mine
my guess is that shelly got a fail result and 2 townies (the scummier townies) were put in and 1 scum in solid standing
If we get this in addition to the elimination... hm. I might shoot plusJOYED for being a jester. That's how I like to use my vig shots, and it won't waste an elimIn post 768, EddieFenix wrote:Titus and Fidget, who would get the bullet today if you had a gun to fire it?
In post 666, Gypyx wrote:Tbh both nos and Goofball are looking like cool wagons
VOTE: dripping
- she's apparently quite vocal as scum, but has been laying pretty low
- had a VERY opportunistic vote on shelly, while expression a townread on her earlier
- townreaded BM pretty hard, which might explain him as the nightkill imo
If Plus had an incredibly scummy D1, why are you only considering Nos/DGB?In post 749, Gypyx wrote:So you just decide to ignore his incredibly scummy Day 1?In post 708, DrippingGoofball wrote:Other than a vote for Leia and whiteknighting Talylor Swift, Nosferatu's posts are mostly idle socializing, and even pretty weak sauce at that.
I'm town.
PlusJOY is acting very townie today.
VOTE: Nosferatu
What are you trying to achieve with this question? Isn't this like saying "Which one of these three do you dislike the most?", but not in an AI way, since all three are confirmed town in that scenario.In post 764, Marashu wrote:@Nos, let's say you're right about being in a horrible result scenario and all 3 of you are town. Who do you send to trial?