Open 91 - Trendy and Subversive C9 - Over, before 656

BlakAdder · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:56 am

/Confirm

BlakAdder · Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:30 am

Come on, people where are you all?

BlakAdder · Post Post #14 (isolation #2) » Fri Aug 22, 2008 2:45 am

Alright, so that's everyone?

BlakAdder · Post Post #16 (isolation #3) » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:28 am

Right, may as well get going

Original Roll String: 1d9

1 9-Sided Dice: (5) = 5

BlakAdder · Post Post #17 (isolation #4) » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:30 am

Woops, let me try that again

Original Roll String: 1d7

1 7-Sided Dice: (6) = 6

BlakAdder · Post Post #18 (isolation #5) » Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:31 am

There we go,

vote:armlx

Sorry for the triple post

BlakAdder · Post Post #24 (isolation #6) » Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:05 am

Vote: Raider8169

OMGUS!

BlakAdder · Post Post #28 (isolation #7) » Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:15 am

Vote: Apothecary

He's quiet... too quiet...

BlakAdder · Post Post #31 (isolation #8) » Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:41 pm

Woops, thanks, Armlx. So that's officially

unvote, vote:Apothecary

BlakAdder · Post Post #33 (isolation #9) » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:20 am

Not particularly. Just trying to keep the game moving.

BlakAdder · Post Post #47 (isolation #10) » Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:14 am

I'd prefer for you to make a new post for each one.
Also, @ Armlx, what Raider-BA argument are you talking about?

BlakAdder · Post Post #57 (isolation #11) » Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:16 am

I honestly believe Raider. I might have done the same thing in that spot.

BlakAdder · Post Post #61 (isolation #12) » Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:14 pm

It wasn't really necessary. I was just trying to keep the game moving.

BlakAdder · Post Post #72 (isolation #13) » Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:05 pm

armlx wrote:Self voting during the random phase can definitely be a good thing, and is only a terrible thing once the meta of it existing is pervasive.

ITT armlx tries to sound smart.

BlakAdder · Post Post #79 (isolation #14) » Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:25 am

It's called the random voting stage for a reason, bulvox.[/b]

BlakAdder · Post Post #80 (isolation #15) » Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:26 am

That said,

FOS: bulvox for being overly defensive

and

unvote

while I'm at it.

BlakAdder · Post Post #85 (isolation #16) » Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:42 pm

armlx wrote:

FOS BA
for using defensiveness as a scum tell.

I wasn't calling defensiveness a scum tell, I was calling being overly defense, (i.e., questioning random votes) a scum tell.

BlakAdder · Post Post #87 (isolation #17) » Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:19 pm

All I'm saying is that it seemed like you were trying to twist my words around. Simply being defensive, I have no problem with.

BlakAdder · Post Post #89 (isolation #18) » Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:53 pm

Overly

is clearly the operative word.

BlakAdder · Post Post #91 (isolation #19) » Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:05 pm

Again, questioning the point of a random vote. I know yours wasn't, but PimHel's still was. I'm going to bed now.

BlakAdder · Post Post #95 (isolation #20) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:22 am

All I did was FOS him, it's not like it's a big deal. If I hammered him for being overly defensive, then I can see where you're coming from, but you're all making a mountain out of a molehill.

BlakAdder · Post Post #98 (isolation #21) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:28 am

I did answer, armlx.

BlakAdder · Post Post #100 (isolation #22) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:31 am

Oh, I missed that.
@ raider: Nothing, really. Again, just trying to keep conversation going.

Vote Count... of Not So Much Doom.

Natirasha (2) - Natirasha, raider8169

Apothecary (1) - Bulvox
Bulvox (1) - armlx
raider8169 (1) - Apothecary

Not Voting (2) - BlakAdder, PimHel

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch.

BlakAdder · Post Post #102 (isolation #23) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:37 am

I was responding to you and bulvox.

BlakAdder · Post Post #104 (isolation #24) » Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:02 pm

You know, I totally forgot about this game. Thanks, bulvox.

BlakAdder · Post Post #113 (isolation #25) » Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:13 pm

Okay, then, here we go again.

vote: BlakAdder

BlakAdder · Post Post #116 (isolation #26) » Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:46 pm

unvote

Hmph. I was trying to get the scum to slip at an unexpected move.
I agree with armlx's suggestion. Expedite the process by getting rid of the random voting stage. Only problem is there isn't much to go on yet.

BlakAdder · Post Post #119 (isolation #27) » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:38 am

Whatever, then.

vote: Apothecary

for lurking.

BlakAdder · Post Post #123 (isolation #28) » Fri Sep 05, 2008 4:55 am

I agree with Raider. Looking back, lurking is really grounds for a vote yet , so I'll

unvote

and

fos: Apothecary and Natirasha

BlakAdder · Post Post #127 (isolation #29) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:52 am

vote: Natirasha

to get discussion moving again

BlakAdder · Post Post #129 (isolation #30) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:05 pm

Not necessarily to get Natirasha talking, but to bump the thread and get everyone talking.

BlakAdder · Post Post #130 (isolation #31) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:06 pm

EBWOP: Besides, if he's not going to do anything, then he's really just dead weight anyway.

BlakAdder · Post Post #132 (isolation #32) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:09 am

I don't see getting rid of a massive lurker who is going to be of no help to us as scummy.

BlakAdder · Post Post #135 (isolation #33) » Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:35 pm

Natirasha wrote:
BlakAdder wrote:I don't see getting rid of a massive lurker who is going to be of no help to us as scummy.
While we share opinions that we should day one policy lynch apparently, I must disagree with your choice to lynch me.

Prove me wrong. Show me that you're going to be helpful.

BlakAdder · Post Post #137 (isolation #34) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:42 am

Have you found anyone scummy yet, Armlx?

BlakAdder · Post Post #139 (isolation #35) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:53 am

I haven't found anyone scummy except for the lurkers.

BlakAdder · Post Post #151 (isolation #36) » Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:35 pm

Natirasha wrote:
raider8169 wrote:
armlx wrote:Or get replaced raider. Actually, I like that one a lot.
I agree, however if what he is doing is a play style then I dont see a replacement happening.
It's not a playstyle, I'm just waiting for stuff to happen.

So am I, but at least I'm talking.
But, after listening to the others, I've changed my mind.

unvote

But I'll keep a

FOS: Natirasha

BlakAdder · Post Post #158 (isolation #37) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:38 am

I want to vote Bulvox, but that would put him a L-1, and I want to give him a chance to defend himself. And in case anyone asks, it's the best case we have.

BlakAdder · Post Post #161 (isolation #38) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:48 am

Oh, come on. Voting me for putting an FOS on someone?
And don't say "that's not the only reason" because your other reason is BS too. I don't need to publicly declair that I like you case to go with it. It's just the only good lead we have. Besides, Scum Blak would have just voted instead of giving Bulvox a chance to defend himself.

BlakAdder · Post Post #162 (isolation #39) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:52 am

EBWOP: I might be inactive for the next couple of days because I'm about to be hit by Hurricane Ike. It's probably going to hit around midnight tonight, though I have no idea how long power's going to stay out once it goes.

BlakAdder · Post Post #164 (isolation #40) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:33 am

Natirasha wrote:
BlakAdder wrote:Oh, come on. Voting me for putting an FOS on someone?
And don't say "that's not the only reason" because your other reason is BS too. I don't need to publicly declair that I like you case to go with it. It's just the only good lead we have. Besides, Scum Blak would have just voted instead of giving Bulvox a chance to defend himself.
Overdefensiveness is not a scumtell.

And why not? Some players have a tendency to be overdefensive when playing as scum.

BlakAdder · Post Post #166 (isolation #41) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:37 am

1. I see your point, but there's a difference between giving a legitimate defense over oneself and attacking a random vote.
2. Explain what you mean by wagon support hop?
3. I don't see how "If I were scum" is WIFOM.

BlakAdder · Post Post #168 (isolation #42) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:44 am

I wrote:I don't need to publicly declair that I like you case to go with it. It's just the only good lead we have.

I addressed your wagon support hop accusation here.
And I simply beg to differ regarding the WIFOM issue. It's true, and that's all there is to it.

BlakAdder · Post Post #170 (isolation #43) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:02 am

Fair enough, I see your point. I don't think there's much more that I can do to defend myself at the moment.

BlakAdder · Post Post #172 (isolation #44) » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:56 pm

But that's the thing. Hardly anyone's posting, so it's hard to see if anyone's scummy.

BlakAdder · Post Post #176 (isolation #45) » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:14 am

1. No one is voting for you right now.
2. If they were, you should have gone back and looked at why they voted for you.
3. Now you see what I mean by overdefensive, armlx?

BlakAdder · Post Post #177 (isolation #46) » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:15 am

EBWOP: Sorry, that is, you have one person voting for you.

BlakAdder · Post Post #179 (isolation #47) » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:35 am

True, but I still think it makes him suspicious.

BlakAdder · Post Post #184 (isolation #48) » Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:20 pm

Okay, I survived the hurricane and I've got power.

BlakAdder · Post Post #187 (isolation #49) » Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:47 am

BlakAdder wrote:I want to vote Bulvox, but that would put him a L-1, and I want to give him a chance to defend himself.

This, but throw an

HOS: Bulvox

in there to make it official.

BlakAdder · Post Post #189 (isolation #50) » Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:09 am

So, how is me going after Bulvox any more scummy than Armlx going after Bulvox?

BlakAdder · Post Post #191 (isolation #51) » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:00 pm

1. My question was directed towards PimHel.
2. I'll give Bulvox 24 hours to defend himself or else I vote him.

BlakAdder · Post Post #197 (isolation #52) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:46 pm

@ raider: I'm at L-2 now
Also,

vote: bulvox

BlakAdder · Post Post #204 (isolation #53) » Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:14 am

I'm townie.

BlakAdder · Post Post #206 (isolation #54) » Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:20 am

I've said all I can think of. I've made my case on Bulvox and anything I say will either be turned into a scum tell by armlx or Bulvox.

BlakAdder · Post Post #207 (isolation #55) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:45 am

So, Apothecary? What's your vote?

BlakAdder · Post Post #210 (isolation #56) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:06 am

What? I claimed. Post 206, but I guess it's too late now.

BlakAdder · Post Post #212 (isolation #57) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 8:13 am

Claiming a power role wouldn't have done me any good. I'd have been lying in the first place and this setup just does not favor townie false-claiming.

BlakAdder · Post Post #353 (isolation #58) » Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:20 am

Ha ha! Great work, my scumbuddy!

BlakAdder · Post Post #355 (isolation #59) » Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:57 pm

We didn't talk in pre-game, but I did try to lead him into it. Don't know if he caught on or if he was just trying to distance, but it worked.