So far I don't like this vote:
cause it didn't feel random at all.
and this reaction:
Cause it felt "desperate" and "informed"In post 13, Ythan wrote:Ah fuck that's pretty predictable isn't it.
but I have to
VOTE: Gimli son of Glóin
cause it didn't feel random at all.
Cause it felt "desperate" and "informed"In post 13, Ythan wrote:Ah fuck that's pretty predictable isn't it.
It's a very weak read at this point butYthan wrote:Can you elaborate on informed?
This flaw of votes didn't feel random.Horsewoman wrote:it didn't feel random? obviously it was a random joke vote in response to ythan's comment.
Horsewoman wrote:Hi. First game here, lets make it a good one.
VOTE: ythan
Not necessarily scummy just something that stood out for me.Datisi wrote:VOTE: ythan owo?
I can very well see itIn post 22, Datisi wrote:VOTE: kyoko
are you purposefully not seeing ythan's post before i voted him where he told people not to vote him?
I don't appreciate being called dumbIn post 26, Horsewoman wrote:yeah, kyoko's posting is very dumb
is it scum? probably not, it's a mildly town thing to do to get the game out of RVS and create content, even if that content is very dumb
No offense takenIn post 28, Horsewoman wrote:i apologise if that looked like a personal attack. i don't even think your posts came from a place of being dumb, i think you were just grasping for something to move out of RVS with. which as i said is a good and mildly town thing to do.
Opportunistic as if you were waiting for a reason to make that vote and they gave it to you with the "Don't vote me" post.In post 30, Datisi wrote:define "opportunistic"? my thought process didn't go deeper than "oh look, ythan said not to vote him, it would be funny to vote him." while it definitely wasn't *random*, it also wasn't serious.In post 25, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:I can very well see itIn post 22, Datisi wrote:VOTE: kyoko
are you purposefully not seeing ythan's post before i voted him where he told people not to vote him?
But felt like you've been opportunistic about that vote so I mentioned it
weren't you?
but i wasn't talking about your read on me, i was talking about your read on ythan. you called him a bit sus/desperate for calling my vote on him predictable, and to me it seemed that you were, for some reason, ignoring the fact that the post before my vote was a "don't vote me" post, which i thought he was referencing when saying my vote was predictable?
that turned into a word salad but whatever
In post 20, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:It's a very weak read at this point butYthan wrote:Can you elaborate on informed?
Calling votes predictable at this stage of the game in reaction to them voting you, just suggest that you felt desperate about few random votes on you or that you have pre-information about people that you felt it's predictable.
"You're scum"
"OMG this was so predictable"
It's just a bit sus you don't agree?
If you ask me a question I'll answer it. If you ask me 20 questions I will answer with 20 posts.In post 37, Horsewoman wrote:I obviously don't know you as a person. But that post reads like an attempt to backtrack for me. You have spent 2 pages explaining why you initially had a scumread based on 'opportunism' and now ypure like 'lol it isnt even a scumtell'
Yes of course.In post 41, Datisi wrote:kyoko, is there a correlation between "things you don't like" and "things that you think are a scumtell"?
I'm still defending my position of not liking those actions and never said anything in contrast to that.In post 52, Horsewoman wrote:She said that she "didn't like" a certain post and defended that position for 2 pages, then said "oh by the way 'didn't like' doesn't mean i scumread him, i just don't like it". I think that's a copout because 'didn't like' does mean a scumread in most people's minds.In post 50, Ythan wrote:Let me be more clear, I don't buy this, sell it to me.In post 37, Horsewoman wrote:You have spent 2 pages explaining why you initially had a scumread based on 'opportunism' and now ypure like 'lol it isnt even a scumtell'
But let me personally be clear, my vote isn't on her it's on you, and I'm happy with it where it is in truth.
In post 55, Horsewoman wrote:I don't know what you mean by conditioning
I feel like I explained it perfectly well there?How is your read on them relevant to your read on me?
Can you elaborate on your reads?
I can actually understand this perspective. Post 38 felt like an extremely pointless post to me too. I can see where you're going with thisIn post 62, Horsewoman wrote:As to ythan i think he's asking a lot of questions but i don't see the thought process behind them or that they're leading anywhere (as they wouldn't, if he were scum). My read may change if that post changes. I also dislike post 38. It very clearly tries to align him in support of you but it doesn't really accomplish anything or add to the conversation - he's just posturing here.
The first part of this is a good read. You say I'm trying hard to make arguments going and you think that can be scummy and a tell that I'm informed.In post 75, bugspray wrote:Kyoko's posts feel like someone who is trying so desperately to have a scum read with the knowledge that everyone they sr is town. A red flip on the slot would also possibly clear horsewoman assuming they aren't doing some wacko SvS thearer.
This is such a hard "cookie"In post 73, superbowl9 wrote:Whats up gamma! Whats up bugspray! Whats up everyone else!
I would like to add a supporting voice to kyoko’s general view on the game, reading the first 3 pages i think we have similar mindsets. Im gonna fos horsewoman until someone tells me i can vote because im too lazy to count
I'm actually sad that you're the only one who realized the "role play" I was doing The thing is I'm not that far from the character personally. I will promise to not let it become confusing or forced though.In post 74, Gamma Emerald wrote:Page 1:
Kyoko I know you have yourdetectivething you do but can you not turn the entire game into that? It reads as forced when you’re looking at early joke posts like they’re hard evidence.
I didn't refute the idea cause it can't be refuted. I was indeed poking multiple people and pushing arguments around. It's on rest of town to figure out if it was from town me or scum me.In post 96, bugspray wrote:What you are engaging is called the fallacy fallacy in which instead of refuting an argument or idea you simply say it has a fallacy and pretend that refutes it. It is possible and not uncommon to come to a correct conclusion using a fallacy. I did not use a fallacy to justify my vote.In post 92, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:The first part of this is a good read. You say I'm trying hard to make arguments going and you think that can be scummy and a tell that I'm informed.In post 75, bugspray wrote:Kyoko's posts feel like someone who is trying so desperately to have a scum read with the knowledge that everyone they sr is town. A red flip on the slot would also possibly clear horsewoman assuming they aren't doing some wacko SvS thearer.
The second part of this isn't a good read at all since it's an "association read". It's a fallacy to use "my imaginary flip" to justify your vote on me this early in the day and feels fake.
Now the question is, what do you think about "horsewoman" without that association read and based on their own content?
In addition you are misrepresenting the intent of my vote. The first half which you agreed is a good read is why I am voting you. The second half is an observation that while horsewoman is not very townish it seems unlikely that she would be scum partners with you barring SvS theater. I am voting you because I strongly believe that you are scum and your defensive, misrepresentative, and deflective reply only makes me more confident in this read.
Can you elaborate on that readIn post 99, bugspray wrote:then who is the scum if it's not you? imo gamma is a lil sus
You can say thatIn post 112, The Slime Collective wrote:Does that mean that bug commit a fallacy fallacy fallacy?In post 98, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:And I didn't commit a fallacy fallacy.
-Black
This exactly,In post 115, Datisi wrote:?In post 109, Horsewoman wrote:Like i dont actually think this is scumvtown i think its probably town v town. So lynching to POE is a waste of time. You could be trying to set up two mislynches in a row.
where was bug trying to set up executions there??
In post 137, Horsewoman wrote:I meant my own reactions with her were tvt. You said that if you lynch her and shes scum im likely town. But im saying we are both town. Never said you were. Actually the opposite.In [url=/viewtopic.php?p=12408781#p12408781]post 128[/url], bugspray wrote:I'm really confused as to why horsewoman said my interactions with anyone avatar roleplay person whose name I don't remember were tvt and then try to vote me in the same post.
It seems increasingly likely that anime person's plsystyle just appears scummy and my read is technically incorrect even if the reasoning behind it is correct.
The Superbowl progression is wack and the reason I didn't comment on the slot before is because in non stagnant games I view it as a waste of my energy to read someone off of one post when they are likely to have a lot more posts on the next 24h
I bet the gimli player has a H*lu subscription
sameIn post 198, Datisi wrote:i don't like the bolded?In post 172, Horsewoman wrote:But they were saying "Kyoko could be scum and if so Horsewoman is probably town" as a reason to push/lynch you.And the sort of implication of that is that if you flip town that I might be scum and look worse. So I was saying they were setting up two incorrect votes as if you do flip town, they were sort of laying the groundwork to throw doubt on me.
like in 75 bugs was saying that "if kyoko red then horsewoman probably green"? how does that imply "if kyoko green then horsewoman red"?
In post 172, Horsewoman wrote:I obviously don't know that you are town, I think you are town based on the posts that you have made? Obviously I know that I am town?
You've really stuck your neck out and are trying really hard, in fact overhard to try and analyze the game.I initially thought that was a scummy thingto do but the more the game goes on the more genuine you read to me. And scum don't tend to get involved in beginning a hard push as you have done very often. It's not a particularly hard or solid read yet. But he was saying "Kyoko could be scum and if so Horsewoman is probably town" as a reason to push/lynch you.And the sort of implication of that is that if you flip town that I might be scum and look worse.So I was saying he was setting up two incorrect votes as if you do flip town, he was sort of laying the groundwork to throw doubt on me.
This is just a contradiction on stance at its finest.In post 26, Horsewoman wrote:yeah, kyoko's posting is very dumb
is it scum? probably not, it's a mildly town thing to do to get the game out of RVS and create content, even if that content is very dumb
You think the game is still in RVS?In post 217, The Slime Collective wrote:I don't think I have much to add to this game, at least until it gets out of RVS.
I can sheep vote someone, if you want, though.
-Black
and then came this:
The initial votes seem ok-ish and this follow up seems "lacking"In post 228, Horsewoman wrote:Going to add my voice to the growing parade of people saying "really? Come on guys".In post 220, The Slime Collective wrote:Yes. RVS for me means not enough information to create strong reads.
-Black
This one seems "too much"In post 231, Gamma Emerald wrote:intent to L-1 the slime collective
My gut tells me this sort of non-content is scum indicative.
wtf is this post asking wtf is my post?In post 318, tris wrote:wtf is this post?In post 98, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:I didn't refute the idea cause it can't be refuted. I was indeed poking multiple people and pushing arguments around. It's on rest of town to figure out if it was from town me or scum me.In post 96, bugspray wrote:What you are engaging is called the fallacy fallacy in which instead of refuting an argument or idea you simply say it has a fallacy and pretend that refutes it. It is possible and not uncommon to come to a correct conclusion using a fallacy. I did not use a fallacy to justify my vote.In post 92, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:The first part of this is a good read. You say I'm trying hard to make arguments going and you think that can be scummy and a tell that I'm informed.In post 75, bugspray wrote:Kyoko's posts feel like someone who is trying so desperately to have a scum read with the knowledge that everyone they sr is town. A red flip on the slot would also possibly clear horsewoman assuming they aren't doing some wacko SvS thearer.
The second part of this isn't a good read at all since it's an "association read". It's a fallacy to use "my imaginary flip" to justify your vote on me this early in the day and feels fake.
Now the question is, what do you think about "horsewoman" without that association read and based on their own content?
In addition you are misrepresenting the intent of my vote. The first half which you agreed is a good read is why I am voting you. The second half is an observation that while horsewoman is not very townish it seems unlikely that she would be scum partners with you barring SvS theater. I am voting you because I strongly believe that you are scum and your defensive, misrepresentative, and deflective reply only makes me more confident in this read.
And I didn't commit a fallacy fallacy. I didn't say since your read is bad it's wrong. I know it's wrong - but that's irrelevant since the rest of town can't know it. But that doesn't make such a read not bad. What I said was for this reason that If you're town, your confidence is misplaced so I hope you will not base the rest of your today's reads based on an assumption that I will flip red cause that will be a waste of time.
How is that a misrepresentation. It's all facts.In post 230, Horsewoman wrote:I think Kyoko is kind of either wilfully misinterpreting everything I say and do or is just interpreting it in the most confusing and least charitable way possible because she is hardcore tunneling me for whatever reason. It's silly.In post 168, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:Horsewoman is being a little vote happy right now.
First, he pushes Ythan, then FoS me and call me town at the same time back and forth, then gimli over his entrance (literally nothing), then bugspray when their name was also mentioned in that post where bug voted me (associated read)
I don't like this progression
And yes, mafia players often change their votes to apply pressure. I will not keep it in the same place as page 1, sorry.
What do you think about gamma's intent to L1 there and why?In post 234, Horsewoman wrote:I don't think this is remotely true? Like scum who have their shit together don't transparently do nothing as Slime is doing, they sort of sneakily do nothing. I don't think inactivity or a lack of contributions is alignment indicative at all. If we can't find a better lynch at the end of the day than "get rid of the guy who isn't doing anything" then sure, but we have time to find something better than that.In post 231, Gamma Emerald wrote:intent to L-1 the slime collective
My gut tells me this sort of non-content is scum indicative.
eeeeeeekkk
I meanIn post 295, The Slime Collective wrote:In post 42, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:No action is by itself a direct or conclusive scum tell unless direct scum claims or actions that are based on elements in-game that change the natural probability assumptions in the game
This is giving all sorts of vibes.In post 307, The Slime Collective wrote:Black is much better in creating cases that I am. There is no point in me talking about below-average opening of Gamma, the fact that his ISO contains scumreading without pushing and in overal not very deep analysis or his horrible push to our slot. I will mention it to Black and hopefully he can make a good case from it resulting into people casting VOTE: Gamma.
~Victor Hugo slime
wait what?In post 333, Gimli wrote:I never saw anyone posting intent to l-1 before...
How so? can you elaborate on this one cause I'm reading page 10 and I can't "find" anything relating to what you said here.In post 335, Gimli wrote:ythan is making horsewoman appear towny in page 10
My current stance is sooooo similar to this.In post 339, Gimli wrote:In post 338, bugspray wrote:Gimli we are townbloc
<bugspray, kyoko>
<ythan>
<datisi>
are varying townreads.
<superbowl, slime>
are nullreads. I liked superbowl's interaction with gamma and I don't think slime showed themselves either way yet. I find it curious that what is supposedly an account made up of more than one player can do so very little, but the way they decided to be obtuse isn't striking me in any direction.
<horsewoman, tris>
are scumreads.
In post 340, The Slime Collective wrote:Yes, I did. And we are still in RVS. People are just guessing each other alignments based on their personality/ writing style/ activity. Yes, youIn post 227, bugspray wrote:slime have you actually read the game?cancatch scum by that method. As well as by random.org.
-Black
Sure I'll ISO him to see if I can see anything.In post 382, bugspray wrote:Kyoky here is some detective homework from Bugspray-senpai for after school Micro 988 club: make associative reads about ythan because there's some weird stuff going on there. You don't need to share it I just think your detective mindset will be good for this lateral thinking and the knowledge you obtain will be valuable for helping you personally discover scum and b then you will make both Umulat-sensei and Bugspray-senpai proud
Sorry, I can't catch up tonightIn post 386, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:I have to go now though. I'll be back in around 2 hours to catch up and do this
How is that trying to disguise it as scum hunting? I have a lot of other posts that are indeed scum hunting and you talk about the one I made on page 2 to explain my playstyle when it was questioned?In post 356, The Slime Collective wrote:Yep. They are discussing how to scumhunt and trying to disguise it as scumhunting. Have fun reading!In post 295, The Slime Collective wrote:In post 42, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:No action is by itself a direct or conclusive scum tell unless direct scum claims or actions that are based on elements in-game that change the natural probability assumptions in the game
-Black
I dont understand this post
In post 365, Datisi wrote:@kyoko, do you have reads? now i see you're explaining what you do and don't like in other players, but i'm wondering when/if those translate to a ~read~? mostly asking in reference to the post where you said that not everything you like or don't like translates to a town/scumread
I made this list yesterday without reading your post. I'm catching up on missed pages rnIn post 381, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote: towny --------------------
<bugspray>
<Gimli>
<datisi>
<ythan>
<Superbowl>
<slime>
rather null --------------------
<tris>
<horsewoman>
scummy --------------------
So I actually checked these stuff and saw few things that might mean nothing butIn post 387, bugspray wrote:A good way to check associations is to also do combined isos
Check this out:
viewtopic.php?t=85271&f=83&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
viewtopic.php?t=85271&f=83&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
viewtopic.php?t=85271&f=83&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
In post 208, Ythan wrote:Oh look Gamma posted.
Can't see any attempt for sorting there howeverIn post 209, Ythan wrote:Eh I guess you do have a couple posts with content when I actually go back and look but more fluff.
wait how many people are on your accIn post 397, The Slime Collective wrote:And of course nobody gets the reference.In post 326, Ythan wrote:I think if that was really Victor Hugo he would probably actually be pretty good at making cases.
~batslime
what pinged youIn post 398, The Slime Collective wrote:Nope it was me. ~ in signature.In post 361, Datisi wrote:so, black is here now... this is happening... when?
like i dislike this post because it seems like... way too easy? gives a feeling of picking a random townie who isn't doing much / is kinda yeet-bait who's pushing on their wagon and making a vague "case" on them
Gamma slot is a good case. Pinged me three times scummy. Do you have a better case yourself?
~batslime
distracted from what? from lynching slime? that was the hot topic there - why you felt people were getting distracted from it?In post 403, superbowl9 wrote:I think we are getting distracted a bunch. Tris, anime Y person, what do you see even remotely towny about slime??
You're understanding, burden of proof vice versa dear. It's on the rest of the town players to explain why someone is scummy not on people to prove they are town. You're literally saying the fallacy name and doing the fallacy in same postIn post 420, superbowl9 wrote:Nope 17 pages in the burden of proof is on a player to provide town content, not to avoid scummy content. Again what thing even remotely towny do you see in slime's play?In post 406, tris wrote:why is slime scum
This vote happened too late.