Hullo! Hope you're all having a wonderful day. I have some thoughts on page 4 so let's get that out of the way now.
In post 90, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like despite not voting Super Bowl qualifies as a bandwagoner. He essentially passed the buck to Kyoko on qualifying that read.I feel like that comes from scum more often than not, really. But your response kinda seemed like you thought I was homing in on you with that, so I felt like you deserved voting. I feel like the honest thing to do was to press me on who I felt it was. I’m not dead set rn, but I think until further notice I’ll keep my vote where it’s at.
So in a nutshell, you were not implying me specifically but me and one other player who didn't even vote horsewoman to begin with, and then you acted surprised when I correctly read you were talking about me and defended myself. You were even quoting me and horsewoman and going 'hm', and you think I need to ask who you're referring to, otherwise I'll look 'defensive' and deserving of votes. That's disingenuous.
Still on page 4, I think #75-80-91-99 from bugspray are pretty towny thoughts unlikely to be replicated well by scum. There's everything here: farfetched theory on why kyoko is scum, followed by a bunch of associative reads that can't possibly be any good this early but make sense, like horsewoman and kyoko are not SvS etc. #80 is excited about a <<<PoE>>> from gamma's 'people pushing horsewoman after kyoko are scum', and then #91 is calling gamma and kyoko possible partners. I can see a theory bouncing around bugspray's head as they are trying to make sense of everything. #99 shows bugspray is actively scumhunting. Creates a theory, talks it out, follows a different guess.
I like kyoko in this page as well, especially the way she is approaching bugspray, picking up things in his scumread of hers that she likes and trying to talk it out accordingly, instead of antagonizing or ignoring it. The arguments themselves don't feel either way for me, but the emotions are towny.