*waggles finger*
EDIT: Oh, and FYI, replies to questions to me will be edited into the same post.
there is very little truth in this game. Scum has truth, the rest of us have guesses. interpretation and inuition is all we have.armlx wrote:Only if those things are misrepresentations of the truth.
I just state things as I see them and when they come to me, shitty tactic?
I agree with Armlx in regards to vote for who is scummy regardless of lurkers, but at the same time...we need other players active day 1, so we can have better read for day 2.armlx wrote:I'm interested, how was the wagon being pushed super hard?
maybe it's just me..but I dont like "being a smart alleck" or sarcasm in posts unless stated right after sarcastic post. just seems like an excuse. and I don't buy it...part of me want to vote Gekko, but I can't convince myself to leave this one.afatchic wrote:ZazieR wrote:Then tell me if there is a player who has more scum tells at this moment than Geckoj, afatchic.
when i said should i lynch him now, i was being a smart alleck in regards to this post. you sould like you are saying since he is the only one that has done anything wrong we should go ahead and lynch him. this was not a serious post, you should be able to figure out that it does not at all go along with what i have been saying all game.
and i said i would believe the PR claim because in an open setup we know there has to be a Doc Or JK so if he claims either and no counter-claim then he is probably telling the truth, if we get a counter-claim then we caught scum D1.
the majority of your case against me so far is you taking stuff the wrong way or twisting my words around.
sick of this game...I dont like that comment. are you talking about this game in general, or this game in this thread only. or just dont like being lynched?thegeckoj wrote:i am town, 100%. i am convinced MafiaSSK is mafia, i dont know why a bunch of small trivial things not the least of which is his metagame. is it great evidence, not by a long shot.afatchic wrote:no one hammer yet! sineish can you please explain why you quoted Doktor's post then voted gecko. no one hammer until he has a chance to explain as i think it was a mistakeSineish wrote:Unvote: afatchic
FOS: afatchic
I don't like this - I will explain why tomorrow if needed.Doktor Per wrote:Hey Scum, when you get to kill people tonight, please kill MafiaSSK, OK? I think it would be mutually beneficial.
Vote: thegeckoj
am i gonna change any minds, nope. and i am sick of this game anyway, hammer away and meet your fate.
yeah wow...scummy...still waiting to hear Darox's reply to getting busted on this.Darox wrote:So you say he started out well, pro town and scumhunting and all that, then continued to get better, and so you come to the conclusion that he must be scum?Riceballtail wrote:The Gecko wagon: Started withgood scumhunting, andcontinued to build from there. I can see him flipping scum if we still want to lynch him today. With that, I will add myVOTE:Gecko
What. The. Hell.
this post helps abolutly no-one.thegeckoj wrote:i am not scum. i have already said i am town.Riceballtail wrote:
The Gecko wagon: Started with good scumhunting, and continued to build from there.I can see him flipping scum if we still want to lynch him today. With that, I will add myVOTE:Gecko
Obvious? the only thing obvious in the game is Scum. I have a question for you but first I still need a reply from Darox in regards to this.armlx wrote:Its pretty obvious it was....Darox has never claimed it to be any of the above...quite the assumption!
I can only imagine. It does happen a lot.yep you caught me, im scum. dang why would i make such a careless mistake. darn.
why is he not trying to win?armlx wrote:I have legitimate concerns that unless Doktor is scum, he is in violation of
Thoughts? Not saying this is indicative of him being scum, but more an issue that should be dealt with on a higher level.Site Rules wrote:# Play to win the game.
@ Armix: I don't understand why you under-rate Darox so much. sure he says it was a slip up, but why reply for him.retrowiz wrote:Obvious? the only thing obvious in the game is Scum. I have a question for you but first I still need a reply from Darox in regards to this.armlx wrote:Its pretty obvious it was....Darox has never claimed it to be any of the above...quite the assumption!
I can only imagine. It does happen a lot.yep you caught me, im scum. dang why would i make such a careless mistake. darn.
No since I intentionally waited for him to admit it was a slip-upkuribo wrote:Um. Aren't YOU replying for him when you give him an A-B-C list of alibi's to use?retrowiz wrote: @ Armix: I don't understand why you under-rate Darox so much. sure he says it was a slip up, but why reply for him.
a) I think the spinning tiger is able to reply for itself.
b) Darox could have been baiting/hunting some responces
c) Darox could be scum and attempting to misrepresent others.
probably a few more tactics I havn't mentioned, but I don't believe Darox is above creative posts to gather further info.
"Obvious"...what does that mean exactly in a game based on lies? Darox, this doesn't specifically have anything to do with you, but others replying on your behalf.Darox wrote:Because an obvious slipup is by definition obvious?
I don't see what you are trying to say here. Are you saying I was trying to see if half a dozen other people would also slip up and voted RBT because of it? I was testing people to see if they were reading the game? What?
between the 2 it's an easy Afat. thats were my vote was before the big gecko debate, and Afat's lynch me first junk makes me like that vote all fresh and new.ZazieR wrote:I agree with Sineish. K7 you could speak with your vote.
Kuribo, who would you chose to vote of Geckoj and afatchic?
Retro, same question for you.
I'm clearly not sold on him being town from the one comment. and that single comment does no erase my current/past belief. just thought it should be considered and not simply dismissed just in case.kuribo wrote:Okay, gotcha.armlx wrote:My point was that we have no reasonable indication as to which of the two his action was, and all your question could get into was a series of WIFOM.
@retrowiz: So you say that you think gecko's statement about Zaz being scum may indicate his being town? But you're voting him because of his poor play yesterday? What?
I just dont see that as a concrete reason to hit him up if you come up town, any one else you got dirt on?thegeckoj wrote:just look over his entire post history this game. he has added absolutely nothing except to vote me because of a feeling. he doesnt even attempt to provide any evidence.retrowiz wrote:@ gecko. what's your final case on Mafiassk?
i realize a lot of people are convinced i am scum, there is likely no way for me to avoid my fate today, so be it. however when i turn up town tomorrow i hope all you vote MafiaSSK so at least you can try to even the score.
are you even following this thread?!?!?! I'm happy with the gecko wagon, just looking for further discussion so I have more info for tommorow.kuribo wrote:Sure, let's ignore scummy behavior and lynch a lurker.retrowiz wrote:I'm tempted to vote for some of the deadbeats in here.
Or let's vote for the guy who wants to take the attention off the bandwagon and lynch a lurker... WHILE VOTING WITH THE BANDWAGON AND PUTTING THE BANDWAGON AT L-1.
Vote: Retrowiz
wow...2 records on 1 page...what else is up for grabs for me to obtain. too late for "quickest lynch" I guess...hasdgfas wrote:this is one of the scummiest non-post posts I've ever seen.retrowiz wrote:vote:RBT
not a OMGUS, simply because I can.
unvote
changed my mind, cause I'm not as "simple" as others.
@kuribo: What was with that hammer yesterday? It seemed to be nothing more than a rage hammer.
why post??...cause too many games stall out or need replacements..I don't mind kicking up dirt cause it keeps the game alive (although there only seems to be us 4 here...that includes RBT.)kuribo wrote:So why post it at all? You made a conscientious choice to Vote, unvote, and the Post. All within seconds of one another.retrowiz wrote: (actually, when I started it the post I wasn't thinking about the unvote part...but then I couldn't justify my vote other than being like RBT and I dont WANT to be like RBT. hence the unvote)
I was the first to ask RBT why, then you, then headgas (or whatever his name is...sorry)kuribo wrote:No, I meant, why post at that particular point with something that actually says nothing? Are you trying to give the impression that you're scumhunting?retrowiz wrote:why post??...cause too many games stall out or need replacements..I don't mind kicking up dirt cause it keeps the game alive (although there only seems to be us 4 here...that includes RBT.)kuribo wrote:So why post it at all? You made a conscientious choice to Vote, unvote, and the Post. All within seconds of one another.retrowiz wrote: (actually, when I started it the post I wasn't thinking about the unvote part...but then I couldn't justify my vote other than being like RBT and I dont WANT to be like RBT. hence the unvote)
also in this game I never not post something I start...
wow...a third time?!?!?! seriously... there has already been discussion on this...go back and read the thread again...I'm not reliving that a third time.kuribo wrote:Also, I think we should revisit this since it fell by the wayside during fatchic's lynch:
retrowiz wrote:he wasn't voting...not even on the vote count. I will hold back the mishammer until you get some input out in.
I gotta ask. What makes me an Idiot.Knight of Cydonia wrote:I'm not saying we should have gone for a second best candidate - I'm saying I find people saying "No more discussion until we lynch gecko" scummy. It's perfectly possible to continue discussing other players - and if you had, you might have found someone equally scummy as gecko. It's always a bad thing to close down discussion, whether you have multiple suspects or just one - in fact, if you only have one clear cut suspect, maybe you shouldd think twice and discuss even more, to think about possible situations teh next day. As shown right now, by the fact the only real suspects are RBT and retrowiz, just because they're being a pair of idiots. Because of you (and others, admittedly, but not so vociferously) refusing to talk any further about anyone else until gecko was lynched, we haven't got any real concrete suspects.