In post 4117, mastina wrote:Titus said not one, but two, things that I happen to agree with: Hopkirk is just town whenever he posts, and Dannflor was suspicious of Bell at end of day when Bell's posts have been incredibly lackluster.
If you read my Titus case, do you remember what I said?
"When Titus and I agree on something, it is an incredibly promising sign for her being town. Sadly, a lack of agreement isn't alignment indicative", or something like that.
Prior to those two posts, Titus and I were not agreeing on literally anything--not a scumtell, but an absence of a strong towntell.
Those two posts have Titus and I having common ground--not absolute proof of the strong towntell, but potentially an indicator OF it.
In short: Titus and I mindmelding means that Titus is town. Titus hasn't approached full mindmeld territory, but she posted things that COULD be indicative of the start of a mindmeld--that's enough for me to have some benefit of the doubt, to second-guess my Titus case in favor of voting a common scumread in Bell.
"When Titus and I agree on something, it is an incredibly promising sign for her being town. Sadly, a lack of agreement isn't alignment indicative", or something like that.
this seems a bit flawed imo
you either agree on something, or you don't agree on anything
if the first one is town!indicative, the second one HAS to be scum!indicative, because as I understand it those are the only two possibilities
there's gotta be some inbetween where you don't agree not many things, which is NAI
this whole game, you have both spouted many, many opinions
and now you agree on TWO things and that's enough to give you massive pause? what do you think the chance is that scum!Titus "disagrees" with you on EVERYTHING is, or even the chance that a random person disagrees with you on everything? imo, not very high