Micro 999 | Underage Gun Control | Mafia wins!

Ythan · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 6:45 pm

Yooooo

Ythan · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:35 pm

In post 11, Hoopla wrote:an interesting thing about this setup is the goon is a pseudo-godfather à la vengeful 5p.

if we elim the goon first, it essentially vanilla-ises the suicide bomber.

we should find the goon first.

I mean how is that better than just killing the bomber, leaving a literally vanilla goon?

Ythan · Post Post #15 (isolation #2) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 8:37 pm

Wait can the bomber day bomb? Okay if so.

Ythan · Post Post #20 (isolation #3) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:16 pm

In post 16, Hoopla wrote:
@mod

can the suicide bomber bomb anyone after its death? (like a vengeful shot)

~~

if not, we may be able to goad the bomber into suiciding by leaving our top suspects dangling deliciously on E-1 for a while. if the tension is especially palpable, the bomber will surely crumble.
scum would HATE to miss out on a bombing by being hammered first.

Why would we want to let the bomber bomb instead of just hammering them?

Ythan · Post Post #21 (isolation #4) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:18 pm

I'm not saying speedwagon but 16 makes no sense why suggest giving scum a chance to trade when it that scenario the alternative is that they just die alone?

Ythan · Post Post #23 (isolation #5) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:21 pm

In post 22, Menalque wrote:
In post 21, Ythan wrote:I'm not saying speedwagon
Coward

VOTE: Mena

Ythan · Post Post #26 (isolation #6) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:51 pm

In post 25, Hoopla wrote:
In post 20, Ythan wrote:Why would we want to let the bomber bomb instead of just hammering them?
by pushing through a quick-elim (or hammering out of nowhere) we risk eliminating an unclaimed IC.

to wait to check if a player is the IC is to also give the bomber a chance to bomb.

Yon didn't say anything about the ic you were talking about giving the bomber a chance to bomb before being quickhammered.

Ythan · Post Post #29 (isolation #7) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 10:55 pm

In post 27, Hoopla wrote:
In post 26, Ythan wrote:Yon didn't say anything about the ic you were talking about giving the bomber a chance to bomb before being quickhammered.
literally one post after #16 i realised the symmetrical dilemmas of the IC & bomber.

i was thinking out loud.

I know but like I think it's an odd thing to think out loud that we should make sure the scum bomber gets a chance to bomb.

Ythan · Post Post #32 (isolation #8) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:07 pm

My bad.

Pedit but I guess it's fine. Still though.

Ythan · Post Post #35 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:45 pm

Whoa I didn't know just v worked.

Ythan · Post Post #38 (isolation #10) » Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:53 pm

In post 37, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 16, Hoopla wrote:
@mod

can the suicide bomber bomb anyone after its death? (like a vengeful shot)

~~

if not, we may be able to goad the bomber into suiciding by leaving our top suspects dangling deliciously on E-1 for a while. if the tension is especially palpable, the bomber will surely crumble.
scum would HATE to miss out on a bombing by being hammered first.
I support this strat!

Why?

Ythan · Post Post #50 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:44 am

In post 41, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 29, Ythan wrote:
In post 27, Hoopla wrote:
In post 26, Ythan wrote:Yon didn't say anything about the ic you were talking about giving the bomber a chance to bomb before being quickhammered.
literally one post after #16 i realised the symmetrical dilemmas of the IC & bomber.

i was thinking out loud.
I know but like I think it's an odd thing to think out loud that we should make sure the scum bomber gets a chance to bomb.
I don't like this scum read.

What are you referring to as a scum read?

Ythan · Post Post #56 (isolation #12) » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:41 am

In post 55, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 50, Ythan wrote:
In post 41, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 29, Ythan wrote:
In post 27, Hoopla wrote:
In post 26, Ythan wrote:Yon didn't say anything about the ic you were talking about giving the bomber a chance to bomb before being quickhammered.
literally one post after #16 i realised the symmetrical dilemmas of the IC & bomber.

i was thinking out loud.
I know but like I think it's an odd thing to think out loud that we should make sure the scum bomber gets a chance to bomb.
I don't like this scum read.
What are you referring to as a scum read?
The part where you say you think something is odd.
Did you mean odd in a NAI sense?

I meant odd in an I'm asking you a question sense.

Ythan · Post Post #58 (isolation #13) » Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:00 am

In post 57, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 56, Ythan wrote:
In post 55, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 50, Ythan wrote:
In post 41, Vanderscamp wrote:
In post 29, Ythan wrote:
In post 27, Hoopla wrote:
In post 26, Ythan wrote:Yon didn't say anything about the ic you were talking about giving the bomber a chance to bomb before being quickhammered.
literally one post after #16 i realised the symmetrical dilemmas of the IC & bomber.

i was thinking out loud.
I know but like I think it's an odd thing to think out loud that we should make sure the scum bomber gets a chance to bomb.
I don't like this scum read.
What are you referring to as a scum read?
The part where you say you think something is odd.
Did you mean odd in a NAI sense?
I meant odd in an I'm asking you a question sense.
Yeah, but you're asking a question based on thinking something Hoopla did was odd, right?
If you don't think it being odd was alignment indicative in any way, why did you ask about it at all?

To determine whether it was alignment indicative don't be dense.

Ythan · Post Post #86 (isolation #14) » Fri Mar 05, 2021 11:04 pm

No he hasn't!

Ythan · Post Post #87 (isolation #15) » Fri Mar 05, 2021 11:05 pm

There it is.

Ythan · Post Post #117 (isolation #16) » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:14 am

Hoopla can have her cake, eat it, and still have two left over.

Ythan · Post Post #118 (isolation #17) » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:18 am

In post 16, Hoopla wrote:@mod

can the suicide bomber bomb anyone after its death? (like a vengeful shot)

That being said this is a weird question. I myself missed that the bomber is an any time bomber but I don't know how you'd get the idea it's vengeful.

Ythan · Post Post #127 (isolation #18) » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:26 pm

In post 121, Menalque wrote:I’m also gonna need to hear ythan, vanders, and hoopla justify their votes

You called me a cowherd.

Ythan · Post Post #130 (isolation #19) » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:49 pm

Nothing has grabbed me yet.

Ythan · Post Post #132 (isolation #20) » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:04 pm

Haven't really formed any but I'll look again in a minute if you want.

Ythan · Post Post #137 (isolation #21) » Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:08 pm

VOTE: infinity sure

Ythan · Post Post #181 (isolation #22) » Mon Mar 08, 2021 12:08 pm

In post 178, Menalque wrote:Uh

Was that not a hammer

In post 179, Menalque wrote:Oh, mare unvoted

Lol same

Ythan · Post Post #243 (isolation #23) » Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:10 pm

In post 242, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 130, Ythan wrote:Nothing has grabbed me yet.

In post 132, Ythan wrote:Haven't really formed any but I'll look again in a minute if you want.
I ISO'd him, this actually felt pretty towny to me, because he could've made up something to say as scum but didn't.

Though he wasn't as town as I thought

I think it's interesting that the first half of this post is an explanation of why you found me townie and then a non explanation mitigating it.

Ythan · Post Post #244 (isolation #24) » Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:11 pm

And then the second half is*

Ythan · Post Post #246 (isolation #25) » Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:18 pm

Pretty sure you're not and if you are we'll find out in due time.

Ythan · Post Post #248 (isolation #26) » Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:23 pm

Why I'm focusing on what? Pointing out one post didn't make sense or disputing that you're confirmed town which you're not?

Ythan · Post Post #249 (isolation #27) » Mon Mar 08, 2021 5:25 pm

Did you expect misclaiming to be confirmed town would be an acceptable alternative to a sensible response because after that initial post I'm responding directly to you speaking to me.

Ythan · Post Post #259 (isolation #28) » Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:16 am

In post 257, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 248, Ythan wrote:Why I'm focusing on what? Pointing out one post didn't make sense or disputing that you're confirmed town which you're not?
Focusing on trying to sort me, the correct way to sort me is to see whether I'm alive on d2

Wow it's like you literally didn't even read those two posts did you.

Ythan · Post Post #261 (isolation #29) » Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:26 am

Will do it's a new day.

Ythan · Post Post #264 (isolation #30) » Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:31 am

I don't understand what's do hard to understand about me responding to your posts as if they contain nonsense when they do. Get used to it we're playing Mafia.

Ythan · Post Post #267 (isolation #31) » Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:40 am

Idgaf about how many townreads you have? How much bigger a spoon can I feed you "I'm responding to specific foolish posts you make" with.

Ythan · Post Post #339 (isolation #32) » Wed Mar 10, 2021 2:56 pm

UNVOTE:

Woah

Ythan · Post Post #447 (isolation #33) » Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:30 am

Not scum here.

Ythan · Post Post #455 (isolation #34) » Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:33 am

I guess it would be wise to VOTE: Flea the Magician

Ythan · Post Post #458 (isolation #35) » Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:34 am

Are you quite sure.

Ythan · Post Post #463 (isolation #36) » Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:49 am

Still town.

Ythan · Post Post #467 (isolation #37) » Thu Mar 11, 2021 9:01 am

Go town.

Ythan · Post Post #570 (isolation #38) » Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:45 pm

Gg you two.

Ythan · Post Post #594 (isolation #39) » Wed Mar 24, 2021 6:26 am

Heheh