My case for amendment of rules 2 and 3

Ythan · Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:23 pm

I've been looking forward to this thread ego.

Ythan · Post Post #4 (isolation #1) » Sat Apr 17, 2021 8:29 pm

In post 3, implosion wrote:offending posts

Nah

Ythan · Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:45 pm

I think it's like, if a player is or is not active elsewhere on site relative to the game it's alignment indicative.

Ythan · Post Post #13 (isolation #3) » Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:06 pm

Huh I'm not sure I get it all the way through but I don't think I really want it to sink in anyway.

Ythan · Post Post #15 (isolation #4) » Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:46 am

Gotcha now!

Ythan · Post Post #31 (isolation #5) » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:16 am

In post 29, bugspray wrote:I always assumed that bringing up a players' activity outside of threads related to the game were against the rules, so I can just say "x is scum because elitell" and then it's okay as long as I don't bring up the specific data that I drew the conclusion from?

I don't think that assumption leads to that conclusion.

Ythan · Post Post #32 (isolation #6) » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:17 am

But that's my own take idk what gets by in practice.

Ythan · Post Post #53 (isolation #7) » Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:37 pm

Don't make us choose between games and bans I hear we've already got a slowdown