Actually there's a good bit of information there without you pressing, your pressing is amusing though
In post 424, Enchant wrote:Willow i consider likely townie from this point on.
Not because what he say, but how. It doesn't look like mafia accuse, which are more accurate and pointly, he looks like gonna explode this keyboard (mafia read what they write mostly). Just call this gut if you wish.
It's hard to understand what he says though. VFP mostly throwed things like "People do something it's boring", it's like you want to make comment but doesn't want to attract attention via making fun from game yourself.
I get scumread to fluff for doin that xD
In post 427, VFP wrote:I'm here to discuss Willow. What exact read do you want from me right now?
Also answer what I've already asked.
Why is the Dunn wagon the focus for you from my ISO. This was an obvious big part of why I'm scum to you because you are not removing your vote until I explain it.
Why did you say I think its a bad wagon?
And why are you not questioning players like jjh or wheme for something you are claiming to not be okay with?
You even go as far to say that jjh isn't scummy for posting that there's content then ignoring the game.
Beforehand Wheme says that Dunn wagon isn't good or whatever he said and votes without reason. You show no intention at all to follow up with this or find out the intent. Why? Are you satisfied with Wheme having a reason regardless is scummy or not?
I'm sure your answers will help me understand but this just seems you're not really paying attention to the game and going for what seems to be an easy push to the naked eye.
This is why I love you VFP.
*Considers adding salt to the popcorn machine, then decides agains it because ya'll know its coming*
In post 428, willow1 wrote:i made it very clear why, but sure
In post 418, VFP wrote:And don't go with 'assumed' or 'implied' bullshit.
the second quote makes it clear that you went back and found exactly why i believed you thought it was a bad wagon. rather than explaining, correcting, clarifying, etc. you immediately moved to shut down the explanation preemptively while still acting like you didn't know the answer
throughout this entire conversation you have been hellbent on flopping and playing the wounded townie, standing strong in the face of persecution, when in reality you've stood for nothing all game. you acted like i should have asked you about sam instead, and when i said to feel free to explain, because all i've wanted is for you to give the thoughts you supposedly have and gave you multiple vehicles to help get you to do so...you promptly still did not explain your sam read.
you supposedly think i am fake, forced, painting this false narrative around you maliciously. this is much more than you have given on sam, but there's no vote to accompany it. you knew exactly why i asked about dunn specifically but topic switched to act like you didn't.
rather than claiming my stepback was inherently scum motivated, you're acting like you didn't see it or that me not breaking it was scum indicative.
this entire conversation reeks of bad faith, deflection and i would love to piledrive you.
oooo I
when people try to deflect with "This is bad faith!" but sure I wanna analyse this because it's quite heavy weighing in my read now
Your justifcation of the second post is a setup and reaching for straws at best. VFP's reaction is legitimate but instead you opt to fabricate some twisted scenario that can't be proven and GIVEN VFP ASKED YOU A QUESTION WHEN YOU MADE A STATEMENT how is VFP supposed to explain, correct or clarify without either being informed or overjustififying their argument and gaining scumpoints? You lose 2 townpoints here alone.
Your second paragraph is something a DnD dodgy rogue would be proud of. "i'm trying to help you! look I have rope, tacks, everything! I also have this shovel...
*donk*
"
Your third paragraph is painting a narrative that favours you and implcates VFP.
Your fourth is further implication of a null
and your last sums your play up perfectly... even here...
In post 430, willow1 wrote:more whataboutism, nice
done with this slot, becoming more and more inaccessible
It's called calling you out.
ok.
VOTE: Willow1
In post 436, willow1 wrote:look, i can go back and quote where i explained why i asked about dunn-it was an arbitrary selection of what i thought were underexplained things worth expounding on for you. you can make your point that you never said it was a bad wagon and that i drew the wrong conclusion from you saying you wouldn't vote dunn. i can make my point above rehashed or pointing out that you quoted my explanations and clearly found what led me to believe that on your own but are acting confused anyway.
we can no u slapfight all day, incentivizing exactly no one to read our magnum opus arguments because they're too long and increasingly convoluted, or we can let other players weigh in on what we have discussed and circle back later.
Magnum Opus on a bog roll maybe.
In post 439, T3 wrote:TVT starter pack:
1. edgy player
2. RVS bandwagon
3. excessive use of the word lol
lol (totally not going to update my avvie to have a goth phase)
Oof the mod sass
however, until known otherwise then I'm assuming they do not and amma keep track of bambams messages.
In post 445, willow1 wrote:cool, you never actually said that it was a bad wagon, I had an overly strong interpretation of the not voting Dunn post and gave a bad phrasing in the middle of a multipage argument. I suspect you have known this since the start, but instead played dumb and refuse to accept it as valid, which is the point I have made the last page or two, and why I think this is in bad faith.
time to leave it to the people to be the judge
I degree the prosecuter to be lockscum, and the defendent locktown.
Case dismissed.
In post 449, willow1 wrote:don't call it tvt if you're not going to read it, blame it on both of us if you want but that is exactly what I was trying to avoid and drawing a conclusion without reading it is awful
steer clear if you want but jesus
Ooo I hate this. People are allowed to skim and form opinons you know.
