Pretty sure he was the one I was talking to yesterday who said you had to be crumbing a PR, and said he'd be very suspicious if it turned out to be VT when I mentioned that possibility.In post 2172, Gypyx wrote:why exactly?In post 2171, VP Baltar wrote:lol can't wait for IV to read this
please quote me on this. i did not say this ever.In post 2175, VP Baltar wrote:he'd be very suspicious if it turned out to be VT when I mentioned that possibility.
it was obviously possible you crumbed VT. idk what baltar's talking aboutIn post 2174, Gypyx wrote:this litterally wasn't meant to be understood
maybe mentionning there was a possibility i crumbed vt was a decent idea, idk
these were my thoughts on Gypyx's claim. it's possible that he was trying to claim multiple things at once, or for some reason just decided he was going to claim VT todayIn post 1545, innocentvillager wrote:never responded to thisIn post 1505, VP Baltar wrote:I mean, what if he just claims VT later and has some semi-plausible explanation for why that means VT? Gypyx has a weird mind, so I guess I don't see what he'd claim where he couldn't make SOMETHING sound ok.In post 1504, innocentvillager wrote:im not trying to figure out what it means
but it is clearly a role crumb
if he later says "oh lol that was just me trolling" i would insta-kill gypyx bc that's scummy
like he's basically committing to a claim there regardless
but what do you think his intention is, as scum, is when posting that? i dont' think he's expecting to get townread for that post.
So as scum is it:
1) random nonsense where he's going to go "oh lol it was just a joke" at massclaim
2) an actual crumb of an actual role he has in mind
3) a super big brained move where it can actually crumb like, 5-10 different roles at once
1) - this is unbelievably scummy
2) - okay so this is the pigeonholing scenario we're talking about here, trapping himself into a claim. This i believe is the most likely scum!Gypyx scenario, like maybe his role/partners roles dictates that there's like 1 or 2 roles that he ever claims as scum here idk he's the setup guy.
3) - gj Gypyx i guess? Still pigeonholing himself into those specific roles i guess but it's not terrible
and the benefit of it is... towncred? really? how much towncred does he get from that
I mean it’s really just Luca explaining why it’s possible for scum!you to kill Datisi though? And that you haven’t been as town outside of that very minor point you brought up about you never killing Datisi as scum.In post 2109, Iconeum wrote:you've done nothing but try to scumspew me all day
datisi literally said he would have a solid townread on me after seeing GB flip scum so trying to paint that i benefit from a datisi kill is just either a terrible take or scum shading me
Then it was Geraint. Someone I was having this convo with yesterdayIn post 2178, innocentvillager wrote:please quote me on this. i did not say this ever.In post 2175, VP Baltar wrote:he'd be very suspicious if it turned out to be VT when I mentioned that possibility.
oh did that game endIn post 2188, innocentvillager wrote:specifically Gypyx, Anya, Iconeum, Luca Blight, and RIP Datisi
baltar are you referring to this??In post 1504, innocentvillager wrote:im not trying to figure out what it means
but it is clearly a role crumb
if he later says "oh lol that was just me trolling" i would insta-kill gypyx bc that's scummy
like he's basically committing to a claim there regardless
why? was your read right on him that game or something?In post 2192, Anya wrote:see i told you ico's a wolf
Yes, actually this was the exchange I was referring to. (Sorry, half paying attention bc I'm at work)In post 2182, innocentvillager wrote:these were my thoughts on Gypyx's claim. it's possible that he was trying to claim multiple things at once, or for some reason just decided he was going to claim VT today
can you explain the problem with this logic then?In post 2182, innocentvillager wrote:these were my thoughts on Gypyx's claim. it's possible that he was trying to claim multiple things at once, or for some reason just decided he was going to claim VT todayIn post 1545, innocentvillager wrote:never responded to thisIn post 1505, VP Baltar wrote:I mean, what if he just claims VT later and has some semi-plausible explanation for why that means VT? Gypyx has a weird mind, so I guess I don't see what he'd claim where he couldn't make SOMETHING sound ok.In post 1504, innocentvillager wrote:im not trying to figure out what it means
but it is clearly a role crumb
if he later says "oh lol that was just me trolling" i would insta-kill gypyx bc that's scummy
like he's basically committing to a claim there regardless
but what do you think his intention is, as scum, is when posting that? i dont' think he's expecting to get townread for that post.
So as scum is it:
1) random nonsense where he's going to go "oh lol it was just a joke" at massclaim
2) an actual crumb of an actual role he has in mind
3) a super big brained move where it can actually crumb like, 5-10 different roles at once
1) - this is unbelievably scummy
2) - okay so this is the pigeonholing scenario we're talking about here, trapping himself into a claim. This i believe is the most likely scum!Gypyx scenario, like maybe his role/partners roles dictates that there's like 1 or 2 roles that he ever claims as scum here idk he's the setup guy.
3) - gj Gypyx i guess? Still pigeonholing himself into those specific roles i guess but it's not terrible
and the benefit of it is... towncred? really? how much towncred does he get from that
The problem is that gypyx could have made up literally any story to any role with such vague clues.In post 2198, innocentvillager wrote:im not saying im right, ive just had it out there and like zero people have actually engaged with it or agreed