Then we have Egix check me. It will show me as not a strongman.In post 1142, Rannygazoo wrote:VFP as mafia encryptor/Titus as strongman/Jake as goon is starting to look like how we win.
Let's just wrap this up.
Then we have Egix check me. It will show me as not a strongman.In post 1142, Rannygazoo wrote:VFP as mafia encryptor/Titus as strongman/Jake as goon is starting to look like how we win.
If you had to vote, who would it be for?In post 1146, DrippingGoofball wrote:I really don't know what to think.
The scum is winning for a reason: they're good at it.
Come on, you know there's no universe in which the game gets to Day 5 with Egix alive.In post 1150, Titus wrote:Then we have Egix check me. It will show me as not a strongman.In post 1142, Rannygazoo wrote:VFP as mafia encryptor/Titus as strongman/Jake as goon is starting to look like how we win.
Let's just wrap this up.
Why don't you trust Roden's clear of DGB?In post 1082, Jake The Wolfie wrote:VOTE: Geraintm
I'm not convinced that the solve isn't Titus, DGB, geraintm.
I want to sheep Rannygazoo.In post 1152, Titus wrote:If you had to vote, who would it be for?In post 1146, DrippingGoofball wrote:I really don't know what to think.
The scum is winning for a reason: they're good at it.
Oh right.In post 1158, Rannygazoo wrote:That’s what I said in 1153.
I hate this pressure late game. If I had been better early game (or bad enough to get miselimmed), we wouldn’t be in this mess.
I can't trust that a Loyal Doctor is the most likely explanation for DGB living through a vigilante shot, especially since 3 town-PTlikes with 2 of them being masons would be heavily unbalanced against (presumably) a Strongman, Encryptor, and Miscellaneous scum.In post 1155, Rannygazoo wrote:Why don't you trust Roden's clear of DGB?In post 1082, Jake The Wolfie wrote:VOTE: Geraintm
I'm not convinced that the solve isn't Titus, DGB, geraintm.
Why would they have a roleblocker unless Egix is scum lying about being a strongman finder?In post 1164, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If the scum had a roleblocker, they could've just.. roleblocked CW.
Yes. They both did.In post 1159, DrippingGoofball wrote:Oh right.In post 1158, Rannygazoo wrote:That’s what I said in 1153.
I hate this pressure late game. If I had been better early game (or bad enough to get miselimmed), we wouldn’t be in this mess.
I could see the masons being real and the neighborizer being scum due to the breadcrumb.
Did they BOTH breadcrumb?
Scum could have a roleblocker and Egix could be telling the truth. As I've stated before, Egix's secondary ability might not actually do anything. He might just be a named Neighborizor. It's not like that is impossible, or even improbable given all of the claims so far.In post 1165, Titus wrote:Why would they have a roleblocker unless Egix is scum lying about being a strongman finder?In post 1164, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If the scum had a roleblocker, they could've just.. roleblocked CW.
Lol not reallyIn post 1166, Titus wrote:Yes. They both did.In post 1159, DrippingGoofball wrote:Oh right.In post 1158, Rannygazoo wrote:That’s what I said in 1153.
I hate this pressure late game. If I had been better early game (or bad enough to get miselimmed), we wouldn’t be in this mess.
I could see the masons being real and the neighborizer being scum due to the breadcrumb.
Did they BOTH breadcrumb?
In post 1070, VFP wrote:I kept posting that Jake is town as my crumb. But more as shutting down if I felt a push was there.In post 1068, Rannygazoo wrote:VFP, did you ever crumb?
Last time I was Mason my crumb was seen day 1 by scum so I didn't want to do that.
which was in response toIn post 872, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I would really appreciate not voting VFP here.
I gave no reason for VFP to not be voted, only that they shouldn't be voted.In post 871, DrippingGoofball wrote:I mean I could vote T3 or VFP.
In post 1156, DrippingGoofball wrote:I want to sheep Rannygazoo.In post 1152, Titus wrote:If you had to vote, who would it be for?In post 1146, DrippingGoofball wrote:I really don't know what to think.
The scum is winning for a reason: they're good at it.
In post 1157, DrippingGoofball wrote:Ranny, is it possible for there not to be any masons?