[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12876718 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Let's Study Games - Final Tribal Council - Mafiascum.net
More seriously I keep finding myself hoping that Haschel’s insistence on his FTC triangle for jury questioning is primarily a way to try and reduce toxicity in FTCs
In post 34, Cephrir wrote:i think it's more that people object to the idea that it deserves as much focus as the other two
... so we're not allowed a thread to discuss it in? That seems like a bad argument. Like, what?
At the end of the day, the threads exist but the juries will decide what they want to vote on.
The argument is that the system we're complaining about shoehorns *all* discussion into one of those three topics. Versus organizing it by finalist or by juror to give more freedom in terms of what gets discussed.
In post 38, Silverclaw wrote:What would you want to talk about that isn't there?
Most questions jurors ask the finalists about the round they got voted out can't be answered explicitly in one of the three categories, for example. Also questions like finding a gif for each juror feel too jokey to fit into social.
In post 40, Drench wrote:presenting categories inevitably leads people to think along those lines even if they reject a particular weighting. it also lends credence to the idea that a jury's vote should be entirely logical, which quite frankly undermines the entire point of survivor
In post 52, Haschel Cedricson wrote:I do think the WORST format is the one where each player gets their own thread. Inevitably players will start addressing points the other finalists raised and now we have one conversation split between two or three threads.
It's pretty easy to make this argument the other way, though, since you could pretty easily end up with finalists addressing things that the other finalists said. You'd also end up with the problem of one juror asking the same question of all three finalists and needing three threads to do so.
