In post 3271, The Resistance wrote: In post 2856, mastina wrote:If werewolves' factional kill counts for the bulletproof, that means that was a strongman. If werewolves' factional kill doesn't count for the bulletproof, then that has entirely different implications.)
Redacted.
This clearly isn't a normal game, and making wrong presumptions is never a good idea. It's better to double-check.
In post 2872, Dannflor wrote:one pattern in her reads list is that she does a lot of "I think x because Y but they should probably be higher/lower. like she was constantly giving herself wiggle room on all of her reads. my eyebrow is raised a little at the taco and kazyan town reads a little because she had fairly specific reasons for town reading each of them (versus other reads of being like "can't quite remember but generally good stances) and then immediately undercut herself by saying that maybe they belonged a little lower
I like this. If I get a chance to, I'll maybe take a look at those.
In post 2878, mastina wrote:Ah yes, werewolves sharing a masonry with two town players magically means they know who all the slots in the games' alignments are.
I think Kakeguri's point was that if the werewolves wanted to shoot town last night and avoid killing the same person as mafia (that rules out killing morph the cat), they could have just killed the third mason whose identity they already knew. Presumably, this mason is not werewolf aligned like Manatee, which admittedly is a questionable but not unreasonable assumption.
In post 2893, Vecna wrote:Regardless, pretty random kill. Potentially aimed to make pooky or unwind look dodgy?
What makes you think this? (That is, how does it reflect poorly on Pooky or unwnd?)
You just said your role is now boring, and yet you want to enter night as soon as possible. Where is this confidence coming from?
In post 2918, Vecna wrote:UNVOTE: CheekyTeeky
I dont want Celestial Powerhouse to hammer unless they townread me
I don't like this. It really shouldn't matter who hammers. This is being petty at best.
Can you elaborate?
In post 3005, Dannflor wrote:i can only think people are pushing pooky right now because they desperately need not-scum eliminations
It doesn't seem like many people are doing that. I see maybe one or two people doing that.
I think I am starting to see where this is coming from with regards to Taco. I'm not sure yet about whether I agree with the conclusion though.
In post 3039, Vecna wrote:Maybe I should just out some pr results and eat a bullet or a claw or w/e
Noting...
In post 3056, Taco Hemingway wrote:what pisses me off is some of yall are just openwolfing with your scumreads on me and some of you are just being shitty surface level readers and i can' tell the difference because none of you will fucking ellaborate on your read
The AtE here is duly noted. What precisely makes the scumreads on you "openwolfing", and who do you think this applies to?
In post 3062, Taco Hemingway wrote:im going to full claim if people dont knock this shit off.
and yall will regret that bc i am a particularly useful anti ww role with majority ww left.
You aren't doing yourself any favors here. What is the purpose of this? Actions speak louder than words; don't want to be scum read? Then show that you are town (rather than telling everyone again and again that you are town without doing anything of importance.)
Why are you giving people an excuse to not read? How are we supposed to find scum if we give scum a free pass to sheep?
In post 3120, Taco Hemingway wrote:all this talk about me not reading the game when people aren't reading my slot at all, makes you really think.
You aren't giving evidence you are reading the game. Like, your top scum read is unwnd which is kinda ???. (I wouldn't say I'm super town reading them per se, but they are far from a top scum read of mine). You've asked people to explain why they are scum reading you, yet they have multiple times mentioning things like your lack of reading and soft claiming.
In post 3170, Taco Hemingway wrote:i think arguments, even if TvT, are extremely useful when evaluating how people around the argument are reacting to it.
I disagree. They take up space and don't lead to much. People can take whatever stance they want; it gets drowned out by the argument. Yours though seems like a TvS argument.
FTFY.
~Ircher