Post
Post #0 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 15, 2021 12:20 pm
Postby PrivateI »
It's your trusty LSG Listmod team, here with an exciting update!
While MS site rules are robust, and discussion rules generally guide our conduct expectations for Large Social Games, there are some specific guidelines that have generally been informal, or repeated from game to game and never formally codified. We will be in the process of changing that in the coming months, but until then, here's a teaser rule, which will be effective immediately:
In the past, game moderators have, on occasion, honoured the wishes of players who wished to conceal their identities after a game ended. Going forward, all forum identities for all anonymous games will be revealed at a game's conclusion during the live reveal. We may allow exceptions, but this will be on a very rare, very limited, case-by-case basis with input from all listmods.
We welcome feedback for things you would like to see us include in an LSG-specific ruleset. One thing to remember--these rules are NOT expected to take the place of the Forum Rules or the Community Guidelines, simply to supplement them with concerns specific to the Large Social Games.
Post
Post #6 (isolation #1) » Mon Mar 15, 2021 12:54 pm
Postby PrivateI »
As a note--this discussion between listmods would happen in between jury votes being cast and the live reveal (I am looking historically, and have only found one game that had no such "break" in between the deadline and the results). If absolutely necessary to preserve anonymity until the reveal (because a listmod was a juror, for example, and the person seeking to preserve their identity was a finalist), the decision would be made by all available listmods.
Also, part of the goal of this is to codify those things that have been a "given" in our large social games. One of those "givens" has been a live reveal at the end of every anonymous game I'm aware of--we're simply codifying that a reveal of some kind will happen, even if it's just a single post with all player identities, and that those reveals will include all players.
Post
Post #10 (isolation #2) » Fri Sep 17, 2021 8:03 am
Postby PrivateI »
Friends,
We're excited to unveil the first set of rules--this one deals with hydras specifically. Let us know if you have any questions.
You might notice that we mention Bastard games in these rules--look for more to come outlining our differentiation of Complex vs. Bastard games in the future.
Post
Post #12 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 17, 2021 8:24 am
Postby PrivateI »
In post 11, D3f3nd3r wrote:Good rules I think (given that hydras aren’t likely to get yeeted into the sun as they should be)
One other thing I’d like to see addressed, could we require that game mods specify the maximum number of hydras that will be allowed in their game at the start of signups?
This was implied in the original rule, but yeah, I'm happy to formalize that.
Post
Post #26 (isolation #4) » Fri Sep 17, 2021 11:30 am
Postby PrivateI »
In post 23, VashtaNeurotic wrote:Okay, so not showing up to a semi-live challenge still counts as participating since it affects your tribe, similar to submitting a 0 for a challenge. In that case it seems good to me. The only case I think that fails to work would be if only 5/7 of a tribe are asked to show up, and 5 do show up, but not the hydra head.
In post 23, VashtaNeurotic wrote:The only case I think that fails to work would be if only 5/7 of a tribe are asked to show up, and 5 do show up, but not the hydra head.
If I'm understanding this right, I would think it'd be the same as sitting out.
In post 25, D3f3nd3r wrote:If the challenge explicitly calls for at most five members of a tribe to participate (in any capacity, including strategizing beforehand) and you are not one of them, it should count as an "official sit out".
If I'm reading correctly, I think everyone is on the same page here (let me know if I'm misinterpreting it). But yes, we sometimes have challenges that require less than x people to participate (where x is the number of people currently on the tribe). Even if the people participating in the challenge are inclusionary rather than exclusionary (i.e. "Jim, Rahab, Jerome, SarahBeth, and Refrigerator are the five competing for our tribe", rather than "Ellen is sitting out for our tribe"), if the hydra head is either not included or is explicitly excluded, they would not count as "participating" for hydra head challenge alternation rules.