In post 197, Nero Cain wrote:It's somewhat unlikely but not impossible that you and DBG are scum that are fake claiming mason and if you are just a neighbor then shoot
one of you
is pretty likely to be scum anyways.
In post 248, Nero Cain wrote:If Math/DGB were in a two-person hood then it's pretty likely that
1 of them
is scum.
and I've been pushing that one of them was scum for like ever. So I'm being internally consistent. You're just scum that thinks they found an out for you and Titus.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
not really. I'm saying that IF there were an S/S hood then it would be mafia/traitor. no way there's a mafia/mafia hood unless it's faked. So from my POV if we eliminated hood scum the other hoodie is either town or a traitor.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1280, Titus wrote:I see my VLA coming, which means I might not be able to stop a derp wagon
these ping me
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
but also occams says this is just a 3 scum mini like 99% of all normal minis so why would I even think there is a traitor here?Thus there's at most 0-1 scum in the hood
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
House "supposedly" scumreading DOTW and then leaving to OMGUS me makes it look like he never thought DOTW was scum i.e. House is scum
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
House is arguing that I'm "scummy" for saying that I've played with a S/S hood but only thinking that 1 of you or DGB is scum. I'm explaining why its dumb to assume there's more than 1 scum in the hood.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1309, MathBlade wrote:Why do you focus so much on it when it’s more likely scum exist outside it?
also, I AM voting outside of the hood.
I have to echo sister here. Slow down, read correctly. not everything is about you.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
What do you guys think of House "scum reading" DOTW but leaving to vanity vote me?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I said I was still scumreading him and his reaction was "fuck off" I said I didn't think it was genuine b/c I don't think it was. Apparently, he's going through something IRL and got pissed off that I was still scumreading him despite telling me to "fuck off" You guys are bringing in outside game influences.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
ditto but you know hide behind your "but im a bad player" clutch
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
maybe in the past. I remember us both town reading each other in that Large theme where you hard hinted at having a guilty on some guy and then I fakeclaimed cop. idk if you remember that. We've deff been OMGUSing each other on and off over the past 3 games. I was town in all of them.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
She also led in 3d20. FMPOV she COULD be scum that knows that there's scum in House/DGB but as a guy that gets "Nero isn't the same as X game" and its almost always wrong I think its a real crapshoot. Although just in general meta and playstyle changes can be AI.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I'd argue that my play is pretty vanilla though I am fairly aggressive and it's just that you can't read me that you feel the need to belittle my play and call it chaotic.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1280, Titus wrote:I see my VLA coming, which means I might not be able to stop a derp wagon
these ping me
She's not wrong. The wagon fizzled out when DoTW hasn't even posted in between.
The wagon stalled @ 5 and then kyo and House got off. In my last game with her scum Titus pushed a lurker elimination and up until his latest burst of activity, he pretty much was a lurker. Sure Titus could just be town and pushing a wagon she believes in but 1278 comes off as flippant and she's seems a lil' angry.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
kerset was the one that said I was being toxic to gamma, math was the one that brought up pling me. House and DGB were the ones that were sheeping.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
That's a dumb reason to town read DBG. If DGB is scum then DGB would try hard to appease you.
I wasn't being toxic, I was playing the game. Since when is "fuck off" a town tell? It's not and I didn't think it was a genuine reaction.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I'd prob give mt left leg to eliminate Math here but I'm not so sure he's scum.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Sad to say but I have lock “these combos” so it’s weird. Still more gut which is bad.
tbF, I think this post is kinda bad though.
I mean maybe it wasn't clear that I was asking for reads but I was and didn't get them and ???????
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1498, MathBlade wrote:We’ve had a lot of failed wagons and need one to just complete so we can compare against the ones that didn’t.
I also don't think this is a good way of hunting. Wagons going through/not going through doesn't always
mean
things. Mafia isn't that black and white. Already had to get on to sister for this but in her case, it might have been for show.
I think Math "not getting" that Titus was making an obv joke is sorta "townie" or at least whats townie for Math.
I felt like 1557 is the kind of egging on post that I could easily see coming from scum.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I mean House could still be scum and know Math is a green pm but meh....
idk who I want to kill the most. now
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I don't 100% get what's going on with the hood and its kinda rank that Math is not fullclaimed but has a negative utility role. My worry here is that its going to hurt town and its possibly a cover for scum. Might be a decent pl
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Math is just full of himself and exaggerates his abilities. I think it's pretty null.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
If I'm mafia I kill Math
If I'm a town doc I'll protect a50
If I'm a vig I'll vig I'll vig Andre
if im a town cop I invest kyo
if im a tracker I track House
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
he's just saying that he wants a wagon on someone where a large portion of players believe X is scum.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1591, House wrote:Why in the world would you not just shoot me if you were a vig?
You've been crying real tears for my death all day and haven't whined at all about Andre.
Andre isn't playing and his last post looks like a blatant prod dodge. Maybe he's scum and maybe he isn't but killing a slot that's not contributing is good vig play.
Also, I've very much have talked about Andre
In post 1286, Nero Cain wrote:I mean maybe it was just a bunch of bad town that wagoned me and I'm just way off base here and scum is some combination of Kerset, House, Titus, and
In post 486, Andresvmb wrote:Anyway, this is probably one of those games where I’ll voice my opinion, but I’m not going to lead anyone anywhere
didn't really like this line.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
This also has reminded me to ask an interesting question.
Math, you've been fussing at me for "outing" your pr. But House was the one yelling and screaming that you and DGB weren't masons. What's the difference here b/c it seems fairly similar to me.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1626, Andresvmb wrote:I don’t always feel like I have to be here every day nitpicking everything.
Were you here any day nitpicking stuff?
Looking back, 486 was extremely political. The most you've said about this game is that you didn't like House's vote on me on p. 14. And a blank vote on Gamma. You've done zero scum hunting.
Just b/c you are normally a lursack doesn't affect your ability to roll scum.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1621, House wrote:It's almost like we weren't able to coordinate our agendas.
See how well we distance? You could learn from us.
good thing I'm not even accusing Math and you of that.
In post 1633, House wrote:I'd be happy to lolhammer it if he gets to E-1.
seems like you'd lol hammer alot of players.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
just b/c I can't get you isn't a reflection of my abilities it just means that I'm in a game of mafia with other hardheaded ppl that think their reads are better than mine. Also its kinda gross that you are taunting me but you aren't town so w/e. I await ur witty retort.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
There are only 3 scum in this game so not everyone can be right so tell me who are the ppl with the correct reads
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1666, House wrote:The only players with any right to have absolute confidence in their reads on d1 are the informed minority
u mean like u?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1670, MathBlade wrote:Like I wanna just townread everyone but my gut says no
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1658, Nero Cain wrote:just b/c Nero can't get me isn't a reflection of my abilities it just means that I'm in a game of mafia with other hardheaded ppl that think their reads are better than mine. Also its kinda gross that you are taunting me but you are Nero so w/e. I await ur witty retort.
Ftfy
What about my statement was wrong? Do you not think your reads are better than mine and that you are right and I am wrong? Do you think the 6 other town besides us and DOTW think thier reads are the right ones?
let's run up House, wonderful things will happen.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1681, House wrote:Which is hilarious, that the dude who's never even met me and barely ever played with me thinks he knows me better than Titus, who has spent 2 TitusMeets putting up with my shenanigans IRL and played tons of games with me.
Does Titus town read you?
Also, the idea that one can't find scum unless who "know" them is silly.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
thats dumb. Titus was in that game but idk if she was town reading you
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
not interested in busy work just ur flip. Going through my game history to link the game where I flipped scum House doesn't do anything.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
He's only putting a qualifier on it to try to discredit.
also ewww
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
it was that world of warcraft game where I trolled the shit out of you Math.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I'd argue that being intentionally chaotic isn't very good town play, not that I think he's town but ya know just in case he was sent a green pm
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Well, unless Wake is scum then you are pushing town and there's just basic scum motivation in that.
Also, you are defending the snot out of Andre so if he scum there's a chance you are too.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
but I just don't really think a50 is scum and Wake is eh....
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I mean the chance House happens is small but I rather vote for whom I think is scum
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
that he's scum but he's being intentionally scummy so ???? I mean he could pull that as scum and then argue that he's still alive b/c he's being scummy and lowkey useless.
Doesn't even matter anymore as Math isn't even voting there anymore.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Titus calling DOTW scum and then not fighting for that wagon and then joining an easier wake wagon is pretty meh
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
If A50 was scum then I doubt he's scum with DOTW. I guess it's not impossible that he blatantly says that he's distancing from a buddy but I think occams might say no.
but then I also don't really think a50 is scum. I might revisit later on but for now, I'm not sold.
House should die though.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.