Confirming that I've given access to Lila, Klaus, Allison, Five and Vanya for this game, just in case you need that info Lilith.In post 25, lilith2013 wrote:Micro 1008: Burdened by Secrecy 2 has filled with the following playerlist:
Also, EGO.
Confirming that I've given access to Lila, Klaus, Allison, Five and Vanya for this game, just in case you need that info Lilith.In post 25, lilith2013 wrote:Micro 1008: Burdened by Secrecy 2 has filled with the following playerlist:
For clarification, this game will not have dedicated Paragon signups.In post 218, Jingle wrote:Each player must signup via PM and choose an alias to persist across games. Signup posts in the queue will be ignored, but signups via PM will be shared with the listmod, so don't think this is a free opportunity to duck mod oversight.
I will not be reentering this right now, but may at some point in the future. If you would like to be notified when I do so please send me a PM and I will note you in a list of interested parties.In post 272, lilith2013 wrote:Jingle's game has been pulled from signups. He can reenter this game in queue if he so wishes.
You're 7 of 9 as far as I am aware.In post 480, Jessica Rabbit wrote:/in Jingle if there’s still room
Individually per game. The games have no influence on each other past the fact that voting in one requires voting in all of the games you are alive in and they occur in the same thread.In post 588, Dunnstral wrote:How is a winner determined for Jingle's game?
As far as I know, you are the only person to be interested in paragon-ing. I'll wait on Cakez for confirmation, but that should be the requisite 6 to start the game.In post 1657, Lady Lambdadelta wrote: I don't know who is signed up as paragon or non so
If there is no Paragon, Paragon me. If there is one, Player me.
Doesn't show up on mobile very easily (you have to switch to landscape orientation), but on the post there's a little quote bubble underneath the avatar.In post 1702, ophélie wrote: also, uh, nevermind, you obviously intended who may be in the masonry private topic not to be public information and i have messed that up and i can’t even figure out which of these buttons pms a user about their post so!
anyway sorry again skygazer hope i did not ruin anything beyond disqualifying myself from participating
Probably not the place for a drawn out explanation, but semi open actually refers to setups like matrix 6 or C9++ or Great Idea where there are multiple possible setups, but all of those possibilities are made explicit along with a way to choose which setup is being run. What you’re suggesting is a closed with a public design element.In post 1764, Aureal wrote: A little setup tweak might help. Maybe make it semi-open with just the mason stuff being known, so still potential for other interesting roles? A game with just a mason pair is a bit scumsided (especially with that fact known) and not too interesting for the nonmasons.