VOTE: SirCakezIn post 21, SirCakez wrote:pokemon games are a scam they just copy paste the same formula over and over with terrible 2010 graphics
thoughrs?
Scum claim
VOTE: SirCakezIn post 21, SirCakez wrote:pokemon games are a scam they just copy paste the same formula over and over with terrible 2010 graphics
thoughrs?
If people actually want this I can (Pokemon) snap a picture of them. I washed them todayIn post 32, T3 wrote:where pikachu socksIn post 26, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: SirCakezIn post 21, SirCakez wrote:pokemon games are a scam they just copy paste the same formula over and over with terrible 2010 graphics
thoughrs?
Scum claim
+1 it says team rocketIn post 52, T3 wrote:the scum are humans, i thought?In post 31, Milobird wrote:I highly doubt scums fake claim are an entire separate Pokémon and not just a new version of actual flavor
Shea I'm going to post Pikachu socksIn post 61, Thestatusquo wrote:what, your role PM?In post 58, Dwlee99 wrote:+1 it says team rocketIn post 52, T3 wrote:the scum are humans, i thought?In post 31, Milobird wrote:I highly doubt scums fake claim are an entire separate Pokémon and not just a new version of actual flavor
Mouse? Like electric mouse? Pikachu? Slipping? Scum slip?In post 100, Thestatusquo wrote:I thought my vote was very clear for sleepykrew but ok I'll revote.
VOTE: dwlee
Oops mouse slip
I thought we agreed to policy cakezIn post 114, WhemeStar wrote:can we put early pressure on mastina and see their reaction?
VOTE: mastina
locktownIn post 346, WhemeStar wrote:Im gonna full claim
I am mareep. I pick a target to sheep and when I do I become a double voter when I am sheeping that person
They will not listen guaranteedIn post 358, SleepyKrew wrote:Are you caught up now? Cool. This message is for everyone but especially T3 and mastina.
Please don't catch up like that. I'm begging you.
Me next thanks. Give me the exact answer in my head and win a prizeIn post 372, SleepyKrew wrote:if anyone else needs me to tell them how to live their life just ask
Okay who has scum claimedIn post 375, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone posting in the thread without explicitly discussing me and std is scum claiming
you thought you could get one past me calling it "meat" instead of meta but I'm onto you
@TSQIn post 378, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay who has scum claimedIn post 375, Thestatusquo wrote:Anyone posting in the thread without explicitly discussing me and std is scum claiming
VOTE: TILIn post 574, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:VOTE: SleepyKrewIn post 532, Truth Innuendos Lies wrote:VOTE: TILIn post 526, SleepyKrew wrote:ah yes not_mafia, the snarky scummer.In post 524, Milobird wrote:I have trained under miltank for many a year for this snark
VOTE: TIL
lockscum
You spelled town wrong.
~I
Damn, thought maybe something in all those pages changed your mindIn post 836, Thestatusquo wrote:Yeah. Still haven't seen a reason why any of his reaction to me was town.
You're always around when I check the game. To have more thoughts I feel like I need to do more than skim the past few pages or just wait for more stuff to happen. Gypyx had the same reaction to that mastina post as me when I read the quote which is goodIn post 837, Thestatusquo wrote:It kind of feels like you've been weirdly me focused this game dwlee. Do you have thoughts and questions for the other players in the game?
My response to this plan is who caresIn post 843, imaginality wrote:The approach I proposed in #503 would avoid that issue.In post 839, Gypyx wrote:yeah but the problem is like, if we have 4-5 of our most powerful roles stack up on ya (which seems quite like a realistic thing to occur given the openeness of what could happen), it probably won't be of much worth in the end, because we essentially trade 3-4 night actions in exchange for hoping you're town and will use those well, see what i mean?In post 751, mastina wrote: -snip-
Wtf is this?In post 847, imaginality wrote:Oh cool add Dwlee99 to Gypyx and Ralts on the pile of "scum shiftily sniffing for stuff to stir up so as to subtly scatter some sneaky suspicion on seemingly stand-up citizens"
Who am I casting suspicion on here exactly?In post 847, imaginality wrote:Oh cool add Dwlee99 to Gypyx and Ralts on the pile of "scum shiftily sniffing for stuff to stir up so as to subtly scatter some sneaky suspicion on seemingly stand-up citizens"
T3 townIn post 897, T3 wrote:You’re town but you’re poking at nai stuff.In post 874, Thestatusquo wrote:Goats entrance feels off to me so far. Complains about pages (frequent scum tactic when they're behind and need to say something) makes vague comment about the largest wagon maybe being scummy (how would you know? Maybe because buddies are talking about it in pt?)
Isn't this exactly what imaginality did to me :upside-down:In post 887, T3 wrote:I think scum imaginality would be shading people left and right from what I’ve seen with him so he gets a tow read.In post 670, imaginality wrote:Then why didn't you change your vote back?In post 650, SleepyKrew wrote:damn wish I saw this before I changed my voteIn post 648, Thestatusquo wrote:sorry prolly notIn post 638, SleepyKrew wrote:shea I danced for you are you going to respond to that
I was fine with it but lately I've been less fine with it cause brain stuff and whatnotIn post 1029, T3 wrote:P sure he said elsewhere he was fine with any pronouns but k thenIn post 916, Thestatusquo wrote:Dwlee uses they/them pronouns please.
Anyway to explain this a little bit. Okay, so Shea the issue you're running into with your reads here and people's reaction is you're going way too logic mode. Like, the things you're pointing out kinda seem like scum would be more likely to do them but in reality, it's actually NAI or even town-indicative. An example that I don't think applies here but as an example is vote hopping. That's something that is traditionally seen as scummy but town are actually more likely to do it because scumIn post 900, Dwlee99 wrote:T3 townIn post 897, T3 wrote:You’re town but you’re poking at nai stuff.In post 874, Thestatusquo wrote:Goats entrance feels off to me so far. Complains about pages (frequent scum tactic when they're behind and need to say something) makes vague comment about the largest wagon maybe being scummy (how would you know? Maybe because buddies are talking about it in pt?)
No, I'm explaining why I agree with t3. I think t3 is town here for thinking the same exact thing about shea's way of reading people hereIn post 1041, Firebringer wrote:So ur reading T3 as town for doing things that scum are likely going to be seen as suspicious to scum players, dwlee
I disagree though. You're assigning motivation to things that you can't reasonablyIn post 1040, Thestatusquo wrote:My reads are motivation based
Saying "baysian" and "priors" is reminding me that I have machine learning work to do smhIn post 1044, Thestatusquo wrote:No I'm not. What I'm doing is baysian. I'm asking myself what is the most likely motivation for given actions and then adjusting accordingly as i get more information.
Just to be clear that isn't what I think t3 is town forIn post 1050, Firebringer wrote:I meant ur reading him as town for doing things town would be suspicious of and scum directly avoid doing for that reason. Worded badly
But okay I don’t agree this is how Shea is playing
To discuss a specific example here, shea, I didn't take this reason for STD being scum seriously because I think your concept of assigning motivations is flawed here. You argue that town!STD shouldn't have much motivation to make that post which sureIn post 238, Thestatusquo wrote:ok but given that its RVS and all wagons are going to be dumb why did you make that callout like you did? Further to the point, what did you hope to accomplish by calling it out like you did?
It seems to me that as someone who has been playing since 2004 you would know that frequently wagons start in RVS for basically no reason, are dumb, and then from the ashes of those wagons people actually start having more relevant opinions and that's how we move from noise to signal.
So like, what does town you hope to accomplish in this instance from specifically saying "x wagon is dumb."
Like, yes it is, that's the point. And I know you know this.
And I disagreed with that. The main thing I remember is that you think it's so STD can look like they're participating when they're not actually doing much but STD already had a bunch of posts in the thread. Like as scum they could just as easily have not made that post or made it. If STD was lurking around, made that post, then dipped sure but he wasn't, he was around.In post 1061, Thestatusquo wrote:I actually explained why I thought there was potential scum motivation for doing that in another post in pretty great detail tbh so like maybe read the rest of the posts.
In post 1059, Dwlee99 wrote:I just don't agree with how you are assigning these intents
This is a silly question if you read what I was responding to in the first placeIn post 1086, Milobird wrote:Okay, but why are you choosing to argue over this instead of something game relevant.
Shea is correct mid-game is not usually the best time for genuine mafia play feedback.
-Bell
Why'd you out my traitor claim? :O
I gut townread his early stuffIn post 1341, Milobird wrote:Why?
What are you seeing differently?
After I town read the early stuff I stopped paying as much attentionIn post 1353, Milobird wrote:Which in particular? What do you think of his play as the games gone on?
Alexandrite?In post 1468, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Townie town townies:
Milobird
Mastina
Save The Dragons
Thestatusquo
Alexandrite
Firebringer
Not today satan:
Dwlee
Wisdom
TIL (will trust mastina on this)
What tellsIn post 1474, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Gamma head seems town to meIn post 1472, Dwlee99 wrote:Alexandrite?In post 1468, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Townie town townies:
Milobird
Mastina
Save The Dragons
Thestatusquo
Alexandrite
Firebringer
Not today satan:
Dwlee
Wisdom
TIL (will trust mastina on this)
Okay I'll sheep this. Hi KobaIn post 1503, DkKoba wrote:OMG MY POKEMON IS SO CUTE
ALSO I READ THREAD B4 CHOSING TO REPLACE IN AND KYOUKO IS TOWN