Mini 673 - Game Over!

[Lord Gurgi]

The reason for my vote is that I was hoping to actually get this game moving. You guys missed the last lynch, and you suck for it. Simenon actually did seem the scummiest to me when I reread, and I'm surprised no one has looked at him as sternly as they have me.

[scotmany12]

Why is he the scummiest? You still aren't explaining. And if we suck for missing the lynch, why are you voting for someone who was pushing for the lynch?

[scotmany12]

In addition to Gurgi not giving a reason for his vote, neither has Flameaxe (unless Scot's sexuality really could really have a correlation with his role assignment).

I'm actually straight...anyways, I'm not that worried about flameaxe as he always does shit like this. Much more concerned about Gurgi right now.

[hasdgfas]

The reason for my vote is that I was hoping to actually get this game moving. You guys missed the last lynch, and you suck for it. Simenon actually did seem the scummiest to me when I reread, and I'm surprised no one has looked at him as sternly as they have me.

Gurgi, I'm agreeing with scot on this. You have to actually explain this. Giving boring generalities helps nobody.

[dahill1]

Vote Count

Gurgi (1): (strife220)
IH (1): (scotmany12)
scotmany12 (1): (BBM)
stark (1): (MadCrawdad)
BBM (1): (Simenon)
Simenon (1): (Lord Gurgi)

Not Voting (3): (stark, Darox, hasdgfas)

9 alive, 5 to lynch

Deadline on Nov. 3rd

[Simenon]

IH:
-Votes BBM (random)
-Votes Haterade (no reason given)
-Description of his avatar
-Description of his avatar
-Votes Fuzzy (no reason given)
-He says that my argument with cow (the one at the start of the game about "useful discussion") is not useful. This is weird for two reasons. The first being he has yet to make an attempt to even appear useful the whole game. The second is that the comment itself is not useful. Obviously cow and I were continuing with it despite realizing that it might not have a direct impact on the game.
-"Simpor, just curious, but what was the point in pointing out about my vote and unvote and such?" Not particularly useful.
-More stuff about avatars.
-He says he agrees with me, but he does not state on what he agrees with me. Presumably on my vote on scot.
-Exact same post as the one above, except he changed the name per my request.
-".....really?" I can't make sense of this, but that is the entire post.
-Votes scot (no reason)
-"I believe I'm the bandwagon guy, but I dunno." Provides what I suppose is the reason for the scot wagon. I'm not too impressed.
-Promises a more significant post.

Gurgi coming up.

[Lord Gurgi]

Simenon:
----Negative
-Lots of pressure votes
-Theory not application
-Attacks the way an argument is made, not the argument
----Positive
-Calls people on horrible logic
-Hates people who caused the no lynch
-Actually did what he said he would

[Darox]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.

I am a terrible person and a liar.


So lets use the big brush of generalizations and annoy some people, shall we?

It's time for a list. Or rather, a set of lists. You may call it a list of lists if you are so inclined.

Not Scummy

scotmany12
Simenon
hasdgfas
stark
Tomato/MadCrawdad

Scummy

Haterade/Strife220
IH/Lord Gurgi

Cardboard Cutout

Flameaxe

Feel free to abuse me and demand that I elaborate.

[strife220]

Lists without arguments are completely useless

[Simenon]

Lists without arguments are completely useless

Why?

[MadCrawdad]

Simenon, as you already voted for Flameaxe (claiming that he needed to be pressured) I kind of was expecting you to post a case against him when you returned. Instead you did a pbp on IH/Gurgi.

Does the fact that Gurgi voted for you now make him scummier, in your opinion, than Flameaxe?

[Simenon]

Simenon, as you already voted for Flameaxe (claiming that he needed to be pressured) I kind of was expecting you to post a case against him when you returned. Instead you did a pbp on IH/Gurgi.

Does the fact that Gurgi voted for you now make him scummier, in your opinion, than Flameaxe?

Short answer: I'm not finished.

[MadCrawdad]

It's time for a list. Or rather, a set of lists. You may call it a list of lists if you are so inclined.

Not Scummy

scotmany12
Simenon
hasdgfas
stark
Tomato/MadCrawdad

Scummy

Haterade/Strife220
IH/Lord Gurgi

Cardboard Cutout

Flameaxe

Feel free to abuse me and demand that I elaborate.

Darox, please elaborate...at least on those you placed under Scummy. Also can you explain whether Flamaxe's 'Cardboard Cutout' status puts him on the Not Scummy or Scummy list.

Mod: please prod Flameaxe.

Thanks.

done

[hasdgfas]

Right, that's me read up.

I'll lay down some opinions on people in the near future, but first a question.

I am a terrible person and a liar.


So lets use the big brush of generalizations and annoy some people, shall we?

It's time for a list. Or rather, a set of lists. You may call it a list of lists if you are so inclined.

Not Scummy

scotmany12
Simenon
hasdgfas
stark
Tomato/MadCrawdad

Scummy

Haterade/Strife220
IH/Lord Gurgi

Cardboard Cutout

Flameaxe

Feel free to abuse me and demand that I elaborate.

*abuses Darox*
*Demands Darox elaborates*

[Lord Gurgi]

Hey hascow, what about you, who are you suspecting? Or are you content to just bother us?

[hasdgfas]

Hey hascow, what about you, who are you suspecting? Or are you content to just bother us?

nobody has really struck me one way or the other this game for some reason. Maybe a reread will help that.

[Lord Gurgi]

Hey hascow, what about you, who are you suspecting? Or are you content to just bother us?

nobody has really struck me one way or the other this game for some reason. Maybe a reread will help that.

[stark]

bump.

I'm down for a has lynch or a crawdad lynch, but those are just intuition.

I would love to hear some other thoughts.

[hasdgfas]

bump.

I'm down for a has lynch or a crawdad lynch, but those are just intuition.

I would love to hear some other thoughts.

how about no on both of those, stark

[Lord Gurgi]

Hey hascow, what about you, who are you suspecting? Or are you content to just bother us?

nobody has really struck me one way or the other this game for some reason. Maybe a reread will help that.

?

[hasdgfas]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I think I get this setup, dahill ;_;

Um.. share?

I'm currently in the midst of a reread, and this jumped out at me. strife, what was this post supposed to do?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I think I get this setup, dahill ;_;

Um.. share?

I'm worried about forcing out role claims or giving scum tips. Give it 1-2 nights.

If you can't breadcrumb subtly, you shouldn't breadcrumb at all.

This also seems off to me. What was this supposed to accomplish besides rolefishing?

I didn't like how Gurgi jumped in and claimed scum was fuzzy, who is dead, and Sim without giving any reasoning.

Speaking of fuzzy, his actions day 1 now make perfect sense as a newb trying to play a survivor. Not that it matters at this point though.

Post 269 screams of something to me. I'd say overdefensiveness, but that's not what I'm getting from it. I'm getting more of an OMGUS feel from it. As though he's only not revealing his reasons because scot is voting for him, which is idiotic.

I don't like stark pushing for me revealing my innocent result. He seems to be alone in really wanting it, and I don't know why.

Post 298 looks like a bunch of generalities lumped into an accusation at Gurgi. Why be that general? Can't you explain why they're unhelpful instead of stating a scummy generality?

Gurgi's 306 is a sub-par explanation of his vote for Simenon. More generalities, please expand upon your ideas.

I currently feel like a

vote: strife

is the best option. I think I'll look at interactions with dead players next, it may be useful.

[Lord Gurgi]

Can you explain why my entrance is scummy?

[hasdgfas]

I could live with some Flameaxe after he jumped on the wagon right at the end yesterday with no reasoning. Yes, it was deadline, but that was such an opportunistic vote, I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet.

DPI(dead player interactions):

pickemgenius - Your explanation on the fuzzy vote is lacking, and outside of that you said that it's still the best wagon without explaining why (is it still just that one post?). In addition, no explanations on why the hasdgfas wagon is the second best.

umm p sure the reasoning is there. the scot wagon is ridiculous and im indifferent atm about the has wagon.... the has wagon is second best because:

there are/were 3 wagons, fuzzy,scot, has. I dislike the scot wagon right now, and there is at least a little bit of legitimacy on the has wagon....
That's a reason to not be on the scot wagon, not a reason to be on the hasdgfas or fuzzy wagon. What is it about their play you find suspicious?

I'm p sure i've mentioned why im on fuzzy... and there has been nothing since then to make me want to change my opinion...

says scot wagon is ridiculous: This could be defending a scum partner a bit. I could see it as that.

I haven't figured out how to make watched topics yet/ I'm not that advanced.

The watched topics is at the bottom of the page to the left.. Small text "Watch this topic for replies".

IH are you aware that you have made two votes? vote on Haterade followed by a vote on FuzzyLightning. No unvote between...

Points out IH's 2 votes without going into why he pointed them out. I don't know whether it has to do with unvotes or if he's pointing out multiple votes trying to say that that's scummy.


Both of the dead scum went after fuzzy, and were on his wagon at the end of Day 1. I'd suspect the other scum would be out by himself trying not to look so suspicious if fuzzy turned up town(or survivor). I still like strife(previously haterade I think) on that account. He was on me and had been for a while with almost no reasoning.


Oh, stark. Why congratulate yourself on scumhunting and finding a survivor at the beginning of day 2?

Anyway, I could see scum in {strife, Gurgi, Flameaxe} right now.

PREVIEW EDIT: @Gurgi: jumping in and immediately claiming the scum includes a dead player looks like scum trying to feign stupidity to me. Also, you claimed Simenon was scum and then refused to elaborate. That is not pro-town in the least. Then when you did explain it, you decided to post in scummy generalities instead of explaining examples of what you saw that was scummy.

[scotmany12]

Both of the dead scum went after fuzzy, and were on his wagon at the end of Day 1. I'd suspect the other scum would be out by himself trying not to look so suspicious if fuzzy turned up town(or survivor). I still like strife(previously haterade I think) on that account. He was on me and had been for a while with almost no reasoning.

If I'm not mistaken, you have just stated that there was a total of three scum, and you appear fairly confident in that. How do you know that there is only one scum left?

Fos: Cow

.

[hasdgfas]

Both of the dead scum went after fuzzy, and were on his wagon at the end of Day 1. I'd suspect the other scum would be out by himself trying not to look so suspicious if fuzzy turned up town(or survivor). I still like strife(previously haterade I think) on that account. He was on me and had been for a while with almost no reasoning.

If I'm not mistaken, you have just stated that there was a total of three scum, and you appear fairly confident in that. How do you know that there is only one scum left?

Fos: Cow

.

I don't think there are 4 with all 3 killing groups, and I don't think there are only 2 because there are 3 killing groups. I'm currently assuming 3 scum/SK/vig as our killing groups unless I see otherwise, because it makes the most sense.