An idiot.
VOTE: mastina
Let's see what happens...
Gut saysIn post 30, Rogue wrote:Logic says that you are. gut says otherwise.
Short answer is none of his posts read to me as coming from an 'I received a town role PM' mindset. But early days.In post 93, skitter30 wrote:Hmmm, why?In post 90, That Idiot Ivan wrote:SirCakez is concerning.
Also curious abt the chess game
Requires a longer iso I'd say. The short answer should be enough for you to decide if you would march in lockstep with me. Of course we all know what happens to people marching in lockstep with me!In post 97, Rogue wrote:What’s the long answer?
Later yet? I'm curious.In post 190, StrangeMatter wrote:I'm back after my flight, catching up. There is something I do have noted that is probably worth coming back to later.
StrangeMatter, is this still relevant?In post 294, That Idiot Ivan wrote:Later yet? I'm curious.In post 190, StrangeMatter wrote:I'm back after my flight, catching up. There is something I do have noted that is probably worth coming back to later.
This massively pings. I realize they backtracked and claimed 'LOLblinded by images' but it's bullshit. Not hard to go back and look at the eight post pictures to determine if there was something if that list was intended as anything more than a throwaway 'look at me I'm working so hard' thing.In post 341, Dwlee99 wrote:Suripoko I actually forget but there was something
In post 382, Dwlee99 wrote:Cakez: reaction to me ~existing~ + the reaction to mastina
Strange: also reaction to my existence + I think I've been proven right by their continued play around my slot
Your reasons to townread the people as cited above are beyond opaque and look more like people you don't want to deal with trying to pretend to scumread. Nothing I feel anyone should feel compelled to counter with brilliant arguments.In post 399, Dwlee99 wrote:Mastina should be obvious
Do you think mastina veers so far from 'popular' opinion? As I said, I'm having trouble separating my dislike of some NAI stuff from her versus her gameplay, but the actual relevant content doesn't look agenda-driven. What are you seeing, if you're up for discussing more about it?In post 476, skitter30 wrote:In particular, for mastina:
- i strongly dislike her bombay read (i think all of their reads are fine, and i think she's ignoring the context of multiple rickrolls to call bombay's rogue vote 'bad' when it makes sense in context. Feels to me kinda like she's ignoring the context to push the read)
- some of her other reads feel someehat premature to me (ex: the one on rogue), but this doesnt bother me as much as the bombay one
Also this post massively confuses me. And I feel like it shouldn't.In post 364, Shiro wrote:Are we playing a game? Cause I want to join!
Vote:Dwee
What book? It's not a game? He is being yeeted?! Oh he is bad because he overreacted to a post calling his memes obvious red flags and then spend 2 pages trying to shield himself behind someone that didn't scum read them, attempting to appear much better by isolating discussion in a much safer environment with them?
Well in that case get yeeted evil rat.
I didn't like his first few posts. Especially coming into a game after not playing much recently and opting to first engage with someone in RVS he doesn't know, then the drive-by nature of his early posts. Looked like nervous-scumCakez. I like his more recent posts though, and I've talked to him about the initial entrance already; while I don't entirely agree with the approach, I think he's town motivated. Can link if needed, just on phone now.In post 603, StrangeMatter wrote:Why was SirCakez concerning? I don't feel like you've ever elaborated on this and it's just not been talked about it.In post 90, That Idiot Ivan wrote:SirCakez is concerning.
Rogue is better than null on the town side, but given the players I'm not taking that to the bank any time soon.
I'm also ignoring that chess game unless someone says I have to pay attention to it. Chess is really not my thing.
P-edit: okay, fine, I'll keep half an eye on it. Cats are such assholes.
So what do we have here. You come into the day after sheeping LLD on an incorrect wagon, but have nothing to say about that state of affairs. You return immediately to your previous day's scum read despite new information from flips. Then despite the plurality rules in play, you immediately jump onto a purported secondary scum read (that has absolutely nothing in your posting to persuade anyone of its likelihood). No probing into your previous strong town read of Suripoko despite their obnoxious hammer.In post 633, mastina wrote:VOTE: SirCakez
Not as good as Bombay imo but hey I'm down to wagon my second scumread.
So since the second of these is clearly crossed off for Suripoko, which is it for them? #1 or #3? (ignoring that the hammer itself could really be called a pile of number two...)In post 683, jjh927 wrote:The point is that town will sometimes just decide to hammer, and sometimes people hammer without realising, and sometimes scum fake either of these sentiments
The hammer was beyond a bad play. This isn't a case of some new player ignorantly quick hammering. Suripoko are making very deliberate choices here. They started out with a gimmick to avoid having to go on record with any actual arguments. Then they quick hammered the first wagon they could. They're taking refuge in charm, amusement value, and audacity.In post 721, StrangeMatter wrote:And Rogue that doesn’t explain anything. How did you come to the conclusion to draw attention to a really bad play? Because I’m still having trouble understanding why someone on town says that and it makes more sense to be something Mafia says.
In post 761, Lukewarm wrote:So, I agree that the hammer was bad. But they did announce that they were going to hammer him a good 200 posts before they were put at E-1. So putting him at E-1 after this post was just as bad as hammering in my opinion.
You realize there was a mod error in the most recent vote count before I voted, right? And you have played with Pooky, yes? Are you sitting there telling me you think his hammer was town-motivated?In post 694, That Idiot Ivan wrote:Incorrect. I counted from the last posted VC and determined that my vote was E-2. Believe me or don't, IDGAF.
How on earth would you know that? Even if I didn't reject your entire premise that I'm allowed to find something simultaneously scummy and obnoxious, this is enough for me to conclude that you're tunnel-visioning to a disturbing extent.In post 777, mastina wrote:Rogue's voting off of it being an awful hammer with prior experience with Pooky and awful hammers. SirCakez and Ivan however do not have that.
Given the playerlist, I would have declared E-1 intent.In post 774, jjh927 wrote:Are you saying you wouldn't have voted if you knew it was e-1?
Ooh, see, that's assuming I townread you. Which I don't, so run along now.In post 786, jjh927 wrote:Regarding boxes, I want to know because it is beneficial to my role to know and by extension it is beneficial to town
2/3 success rate at quickhammering unclaimed wagons D1 and getting scum flips or something else I'm not getting?In post 787, Rogue wrote:In my defense I have a 2/3 success rate and don’t do it that oftenIn post 785, That Idiot Ivan wrote:Given the playerlist, I would have declared E-1 intent.In post 774, jjh927 wrote:Are you saying you wouldn't have voted if you knew it was e-1?
I'm unimpressed with your D1 content. Lots of refuge in chess game talk and comments that do nothing to help me place you. Your game relevant content comes off as noncommittal, devolving further when pushed. Might be a playstyle difference, but I'm not townreading you off anything you've posted so far.
You have game thread access to post and demonstrate that you'd be a good choice to trust, especially since anything I tell you by necessity is told to the thread at large as well. I'm not giving out info unless I think it's going to be used well by a likely town player(s) such that it's worth the risk of scum having it.In post 790, jjh927 wrote:It also doesn't assume I'm town because from a mechanical perspective you can expect me to do something with the knowledge of who has boxes, making it easier to place me from that perspective
Loyal/disloyal shenanigans? No idea what that means, but noted on how it reflects to you.In post 792, jjh927 wrote:How about that I think scum are more likely to want to hide the details of mechanics they don't understand in order to avoid disloyal/loyal shenanigans and this reflects pretty badly on you given your refusal
In post 794, That Idiot Ivan wrote: Loyal/disloyal shenanigans? No idea what that means, but noted on how itreflects to you.
To you, not on you.In post 798, jjh927 wrote:Don't you "no u" me
In case it wasn't mine:In post 978, jjh927 wrote:Oh I see the post I missed
In post 934, That Idiot Ivan wrote:Oh, and to go ahead and put my money where my mouth is even though I think it's a horrible idea in a vacuum, I had no interaction with boxes last night. Enjoy that info along with a townread, jjh. (and yes, I claimed that in my neighborhood when you initially asked for claims so that it was on record)
Bombay, you should consider that other people may have more info than you do and that sometimes dumping everything that has happened/occurred to you in the main thread is suboptimal.In post 1027, The Bombay wrote:This feels suspiciously like you are saying that I should not be trying to solve with the information that I have available, which is like, the entire point of this game.In post 1024, That Idiot Ivan wrote:As I said, Suripoko is capable of using their words any time they choose to. I have no sympathy for this game of Pictionary.
Bombay, might I suggest you stop trying to sing the song of this game when you've only been given a handful of notes?
No, they only have what I told them. Beyond that they're using their own judgment.In post 1046, jjh927 wrote:Bombay, just for what it's worth since you are probably missing the mechanical subtleties here-
LLD and Shiro are conftown from each others' perspectives as a result of Ivan's role. I believe 'parity cop' is just a way of simplifying how the role actually works in practice, and that they have effectively received the result on each other in some way.
In post 826, That Idiot Ivan wrote:Fuck it, let's see what this does.
My role allowed a neighborhood to form with two other players last night that persists into today. By foregoing posting there until night ended, I was able to get a parity cop result on the other two players. LLD and Shiro share an alignment.
They were informed when the neighborhood formed that someone could be reading along. That someone was me.
Here's what I've actually claimed about my role. I'll flavor claim while I'm at it: r/unexpectedfriendsIn post 838, That Idiot Ivan wrote:I'm not worried about being blocked given the way my role works.
Of course you did.In post 1106, The Bombay wrote:A knee ways,
I had a feeling That Idiot Ivan could be town because :waves hands: roleblocker helps scum combat all the investigatives, but I'm also not surprised that its a one shot.
Because it was completely unnecessary. You were sufficiently townread to potentially draw the NK tonight anyways at the point when the day started. You didn't need to broadcast information to scum (and yes, I'm assuming at this point that you're town, which factors into my annoyance) and you're the ones in control of your role information. If you're town, you know you're town. Barring mod info, that's more than you know about anyone else. It was just all so...pointless.In post 1112, The Bombay wrote:If you really are town, the I guess I am not sure why this anger is directed at me. I claimed an investigative role strategically trying to draw the night kill on the same night I would be unkillable. That does not burn anything to the ground.In post 1105, That Idiot Ivan wrote:I promise you, Lukewarm, I'm genuinely mad. You might have to wait for post-game or dead thread to confirm it, but trust me, I'm pissed as hell.
You're always so convinced that your perspective is the only possible one and that your purported logical conclusions and plans are the only way to go. Like, congrats, you're probably town; how much did you burn to the ground to get there?
Just because shit can fire night one doesn't mean it will. Your claimed investigative's existence and Dwlee's weren't guaranteed to be available. And circumstances exist where I wouldn't have used mine immediately.
Unless you are mad that I scum read you and didn't believe your claim, which also does not seem like the right way to approach this game.
But literally everything I revealed about my role that you seemed to think was a dumb thing to reveal, was me trying to get killed.
Up until LLD, who from your point of view should be confirmed town, pushed the rest out of me. Why are you not shouting at LLD?
Your anger feels misplaced. I said over and over that I did not want to claim the part of my role that was actually bad for me to claim.
It really didn't. I'm upset that you're trying to pretend like you knew that my investigative power wasn't incompatible with yours when you spent the entire time since my claim stating that I couldn't be a town role. This is probably a discussion to be had more productively post-game when we both know one another's alignments as a guarantee and aren't frustrated in the moment.The Bombay wrote:Hey, this probably applied to you when you got mad at me mentioning the roleblock. You didn't know I was a commuter. Gasp, turns out Luke did think that roleblock comment through, and you just didn't have all of the information.In post 1024, That Idiot Ivan wrote:Bombay, might I suggest you stop trying to sing the song of this game when you've only been given a handful of notes?
Like this. Makes a nice tale, easy to shrug and go 'oh well' when it gets a hole in it.In post 1008, mastina wrote:Oh it's probably StrangeMatter since this is scum theater here.In post 603, StrangeMatter wrote:Why was SirCakez concerning? I don't feel like you've ever elaborated on this and it's just not been talked about it.
It also is proof of why Ivan is scum btw; if SirCakez was so concerning, why was SirCakez not one of Ivan's targets?
Also, not that I expect a change of direction from this, but it amuses me and so I ask.In post 1005, mastina wrote:One of them is town, the other is scum, pretty much guaranteed.
About that...In post 1002, mastina wrote:If you believe jjh to be town you shouldn't be trusting Ivan to be town.
Welcome to Mafia.In post 1160, The Bombay wrote:For Suri to be scum, it feels like literally all of my reads have to be wrong. x.x