Open 96 -- Carbon-14 (Game over) before 703

[ortolan]

Vote: popsofctown

for excessively scummy name

[ortolan]

Vote: Natirasha

for being the cult-recruiter

[ortolan]

Jokes.

Unvote

No-one's getting quicklynched.

[ortolan]

Geeze, you can't do much without arousing suspicion round here.

[ortolan]

Will do.

[ortolan]

sup.

mass claim time?

[ortolan]

jokes again

what's the plan of attack?

[ortolan]

Hmm...interesting dynamics. The fact the scum could be mafia or werewolves effectively means that one of the investigative roles is naive. Although perhaps not as bad as a conventional naive role because they know they're 50% likely to be naive. So effectively one of the investigative roles is the same as a vanilla townsperson, but no-one including them will know until they stumble upon a positive result.

I think I should say something: if at any point either of the investigative roles needs to claim to prevent being lynched, (unless they've already picked up a guilty result on someone, in which case they should probably say who it is), then they should claim an investigative role but not which one it is. The mafia know whether they are conventional mafia or werewolves, but we don't. Thus if they nightkill this investigative role after they've claimed they do not know whether they've killed the investigative role that can pick them up or not, so they will have less information and not know whether anyone can still detect them or not.

While what I'm saying might seem fairly obvious I thought I should still say it, making this known to town doesn't seem to benefit the mafia in any way and well, at least it might provoke some discussion.

[ortolan]

First of all; I just got prodded so I'm obliged to post something of content.

Don't give us this newbie card crap.

Huh?

When you attacked Crazy for making a semi-random vote, he responded by asking why votes have to be either completely random or completely serious. You answered by saying you're new, which 1.) is scummy and 2.) I see as BS anyway since your account is three months old.

I don't see how claiming to be new is inherently scummy and the alternative explanation offered; that he simply wasn't aware of anyone in the game's metas also seems quite plausible.

And also, although I guess it's understandable (if dumb), that you FoS for self-voting, having had the same done to you in another game, it seems odd that you say you don't give a damn about others metas then attempt to invoke your own meta to defend yourself, as popsofctown pointed out.

Thus I'm going to

FoS: StrangerCoug

I'll be the first to admit the case against you isn't particularly strong, but in the absence of a better suspect and as I am obliged to post after being prodded I will go with you for the time being.

[ortolan]

Good game? Does that mean you're admitting to being a scum pair?

[ortolan]

Vote: Xtoxm

for posts 53 (contentless) and 73 (which implies he is scum and has not been explained)

That puts him on L-1, I suggest we allow him the chance to explain/claim before being lynched.

[ortolan]

So your last two posts in conjunction imply I am voting for my scumbuddy? Great.

[ortolan]

Are you going to explain the OMGUS before it goes to night xtoxm, if you are indeed town?

[ortolan]

If you are cop why the hell are you voting for me right before you get lynched. I'm not scum and that's gonna get me lynched tomorrow.

[ortolan]

And who did you investigate last night and with what result?

[ortolan]

You baited the lynch by posting "Good game" without an explanation.

[ortolan]

oh well if he's telling the truth I just hope the mafia are werewolves

[ortolan]

Yay. First time scum have killed me as townie gl town

[ortolan]

ortolan was killed because popsofctown thought he was scummier than me, and for the gambit to work, I had to be the scummiest player and my claim could not have been believable.

lol, damnit. Was a pretty wierd and short game, seems it was defined mainly by its screw-ups.

[ortolan]

I had also wondered why I got nightkilled considering how bad I looked

[ortolan]

I agree; it looks to me as though you still could easily have won SC