Excellent deduction..
VOTE: Scorpious
Total scum.
Very interesting you’d put someone at 4 votes so early. RVS or not..
Cool. Thanks
Eh, it’s page 1.In post 15, Dwlee99 wrote:I wish I actually got anything about your alignment from this little stint
Not really.. lolIn post 20, Carcalilly wrote:VOTE: gamma emerald
long time no see to you!
scorpius instawagon is funny
Stick with me . I’m a 6 but I’m funnyIn post 22, Carcalilly wrote:I have an awful sense of humor. I just liked the bit, take what you can get :pIn post 21, Scorpious wrote:Not really.. lolIn post 20, Carcalilly wrote:VOTE: gamma emerald
long time no see to you!
scorpius instawagon is funny
It didn’t hurt that I self voted. Far be it from me to say if any of those would have stuck. I get zero vibes either way.In post 30, Andresvmb wrote:@Scorpious, any thoughts on how your quick wagon developed? I just wanted to see if any of them gave you a certain vibe.
Get plays like this all the time. Hard to find it AI, especially so early.. He has… quirks..In post 38, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 36, geraintm wrote:@meuh
So...I have a way if random voting in every single game I play. Scorpious wanted me to break that pattern because they didn't want to go to 4 votes so quickly, but I ain't breaking my method for them. You can call it shutting down the conversation, but my last game had scorpious in it and they know elegantly what I was going to do
You seem overly worried about how you look.
VOTE: Meuh
In post 45, MonkeyMan576 wrote:How many games have you played with him?In post 42, Scorpious wrote:Hard to say, but not many.. maybe 3 or 4… but there is always some sort of stipulation to his play. He mailed in day 1 last game and was open and honest about it.In post 38, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 36, geraintm wrote:@meuh
So...I have a way if random voting in every single game I play. Scorpious wanted me to break that pattern because they didn't want to go to 4 votes so quickly, but I ain't breaking my method for them. You can call it shutting down the conversation, but my last game had scorpious in it and they know elegantly what I was going to do
You seem overly worried about how you look.
VOTE: Meuh
Get plays like this all the time. Hard to find it AI, especially so early.. He has… quirks..
On phone, sorryIn post 52, Carcalilly wrote:Please tell me this was unintentionalIn post 51, Scorpious wrote:In post 45, MonkeyMan576 wrote:How many games have you played with him?In post 42, Scorpious wrote:Hard to say, but not many.. maybe 3 or 4… but there is always some sort of stipulation to his play. He mailed in day 1 last game and was open and honest about it.In post 38, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 36, geraintm wrote:@meuh
So...I have a way if random voting in every single game I play. Scorpious wanted me to break that pattern because they didn't want to go to 4 votes so quickly, but I ain't breaking my method for them. You can call it shutting down the conversation, but my last game had scorpious in it and they know elegantly what I was going to do
You seem overly worried about how you look.
VOTE: Meuh
Get plays like this all the time. Hard to find it AI, especially so early.. He has… quirks..
Talking in absolutes about joke votes?In post 60, Uncle Vanya wrote:How is mine even bad. Self-voting is always anti-town.In post 58, Meuh wrote:Vanya's vote looks worse to me; sure it's earlier but it actually has some merit as an attempt to push the wagon forwardIn post 43, Crescent wrote:The worst of the votes on you is the guy MM just voted, interestingly enough.
geraintm's isolated vote that doesn't seem to be made as such an attempt looks better to me.
though I think geraintm is scummier than Vanya?
I think the vote post itself looks worse for Vanya but further posts from geraintm muddies their alignment
Just look in the forum. I think there is a spot that you must declare who your main is.In post 69, Crescent wrote:New players tend to see things as very black and white like above.. But Vanya specifically said he's an alt.
Is playing on an alt common practice here?
Knowing where the alarm bells are coming from are only half the fun of psychosis.In post 109, Carcalilly wrote:its like hearing a faint alarm bell but not knowing where tf its coming from. I mean, yeah im probably overreacting. maybe projecting cuz scum me would hop in on an comfy echo chamber like this in an instant. idk man.In post 108, Roden wrote: Why does it bother you so much?
This really didn’t answer the question. Could you link(I’m sorry I hate when people ask me for this) a game where this is “your thing”?In post 116, geraintm wrote:4 votes on the 1st page means nothing.In post 59, Gamma Emerald wrote:How does putting Scorpious to 4 votes fit into your RVS meta?In post 36, geraintm wrote:@meuh
So...I have a way if random voting in every single game I play. Scorpious wanted me to break that pattern because they didn't want to go to 4 votes so quickly, but I ain't breaking my method for them. You can call it shutting down the conversation, but my last game had scorpious in it and they know elegantly what I was going to do
Scorpious has said that I mail in day 1.
I am actually going to try harder this time because paying a tiny bit of attention last game worked. Why not spice things up
You waited 5 years?In post 112, FugitiveMoose wrote:Question of the day, if a player makes a vote but no one takes it serious. Did that person really make a vote?
Hello, everyone. This is my first game on this forum.
I feel like this could be a scum post. Again, could be.In post 127, Crescent wrote:Why?In post 125, Gamma Emerald wrote:scorpious and crescent seem town rn
Gotta show your work.
In post 152, Roden wrote:Oh damn, I kinda like this
Though NM is screwed if he replaces in at some point lmao
In post 164, Carcalilly wrote:by the way @crescent, I found it a little odd how you still haven't placed a vote on anyone despite having shared several intuitions. Is there a reason for this?
In post 152, Roden wrote:Oh damn, I kinda like this
Though NM is screwed if he replaces in at some point lmao
In post 153, Roden wrote:One of the worst feelings is losing to a scum team that didn't do anything while town cannibalized themself all gameIn post 140, Meuh wrote:Hmm that could be the case, I suppose.In post 136, Roden wrote:I feel like Vanya is trying to lurk out the pressure on him, but with 24 hour prod timers it'll be a bit difficult.
I think with the way Vanya responded to pressure, they could be wanting to avoid attention on them and just let momentum dissipate.
(bless the 24 hour prod timers )
however, I don't know if this is an assumption to make just based on someone just not posting for a while.
i like to assume scum are actually yknow, trying to play the game?
losing to lurkscum sounds lame
maybe i have too much faith though, it's a fairly common tactic isn't it?
It is a pretty common tactic to just lurk out early pressure, but tbh it almost always works. I almost never see initial wagons stick unless that player reacts really really badly.
In post 154, Roden wrote:Really liking this post. I'm getting the same vibes I got from you in Mini 2268.In post 137, Meuh wrote:I don't really get why this intro is so scummy, honestly.In post 112, FugitiveMoose wrote:Question of the day, if a player makes a vote but no one takes it serious. Did that person really make a vote?
Hello, everyone. This is my first game on this forum.
like yes, this isn't very game advancing content; more thorough thoughts on the game would be nice. The lack of it looks a bit bad
But the "question of the day" reads more like a townie thought than a scummy one.
dunno if scum opens like that
overall i feel pretty neutral on Moose
I'm interested on follow-up on that question of the day thing, why'd you say that, Moose?
In post 176, Roden wrote:This post is weird and reads as fake busy.In post 156, Scorpious wrote:In post 152, Roden wrote:Oh damn, I kinda like this
Though NM is screwed if he replaces in at some point lmao
This is weird, why would you have an opinion on a mod message? Are you happy Titus’ content didn’t count for some reason? Does the rule excite you?
And why envoke NM? I don’t get it. This prompted me to look at your iso and there isn’t much there.
Oh, you did?In post 194, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Just because my posts are short doesn't make them useless. I've already caught scum, for example. If you want to wagon me over short posts, go ahead.
That’s not exerting pressure, that’s just being laughable about it. I wouldn’t even consider it pressure if it was on me it’s such a bad push.In post 211, MonkeyMan576 wrote:He just isn't giving me town vibes. Maybe I was reaching a little bit. It's called exerting pressure.In post 209, Scorpious wrote:Oh, you did?In post 194, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Just because my posts are short doesn't make them useless. I've already caught scum, for example. If you want to wagon me over short posts, go ahead.
Because of an “omgus” vote?
Not inherently…In post 264, Dwlee99 wrote:Do people think OMGUS is scummy here oh no
Don’t know yet, but nothing I’ve seen about them has compelled me to think they are scum neither.In post 284, Dwlee99 wrote:By opportune do you mean you think moose is town
They will or they will rep out. Not a person that will push the envelope of inactivity.In post 278, Crescent wrote:Speaking of lacking content, I would still like Titus to actually explain that vote they made.
This is clueless town or scum. No between.. now to figure out which one..In post 308, FugitiveMoose wrote:I have played on another forum, but this is my first time here. I have never played with any of you before. The other forum, mafia was just a sub-thread. My question of the day was mentioned was an ice breaker. The fact that some of you got deeply offended by my outrageous scum tell play (sarcasm, is just laughable. Hopefully, we can now move onto everyone's joke vote analysis
Trying to build a case out of that is showing vote hungriness, and those who partake are blinded by the fact that your desire for a elimination let you think an simple introduction is scummy.
Day one IS the most tiring day to be active in and add this precious advancement... Someone quote the number 5 most advancing statement about THIS game (not mafia), and see how much it really adds.
Regardless of MM vote on me, I would have to agree on his views
My bad feeling side is dwlee mainly because their focus seems to jump around a little quick. Not saying scummy, just bad feeling side, that is all.
Know this kinda reads as “I’m gonna just let everyone else sort the game”.In post 317, geraintm wrote:ive got nothing to add about monkey man or The Moose, i can;t see anything obvious from either of them that makes me want to invistigate them furter at the moment. i kinda wanna sit back and see who pushes wagons but i dont find anyone particularly scummy right now
Their comments are too eerily reminiscent of things I would post when I was a total noob.In post 293, Carcalilly wrote:Your comments feel more like excuses for your behavior than activity.In post 276, FugitiveMoose wrote: Your comments feels more like town brownie points attention than substance.
You just repeated yourself … no big deal..In post 324, geraintm wrote:No, I am trying to pay attention today, honest. But I cannot see a good place to put a vote so I am waiting to see what wagons form and then see who is pushing for them badlyIn post 319, Scorpious wrote:Know this kinda reads as “I’m gonna just let everyone else sort the game”.In post 317, geraintm wrote:ive got nothing to add about monkey man or The Moose, i can;t see anything obvious from either of them that makes me want to invistigate them furter at the moment. i kinda wanna sit back and see who pushes wagons but i dont find anyone particularly scummy right now
I believe you.In post 329, Titus wrote:My activity is NAI.In post 323, Scorpious wrote:Does Titus ever lurk as scum?
Happy Birthday!!In post 329, Titus wrote:My activity is NAI.In post 323, Scorpious wrote:Does Titus ever lurk as scum?
The question was asked days ago, by someone else, I believe. Andres, I’m on my phone or if look deeper.In post 339, Crescent wrote:Really the only thing Gera has said that's content is he doesn't think Scorpious is scum. Kind just said "I'll let everyone else do the work" and avoided discussing Moose or MM,
The interesting thing is, his last post was 9 minutes before Scorpious' question... And Scorpious voted him for not answering it only 5 hours later. it hasn't been long enough that I would say Gera is openly avoiding giving an answer.
I don’t disagree 2 of 3… still haven’t flipped the scum switch on Moose.In post 349, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Yeah it's been pretty dead overall. I would support Ger, Moose, or Andres wagons at this point.
Couple things I want to point out as I read this.it’s strange you would choose to offer a dash of white knighting here, May I ask why you chose to? Again, no shade just curious to why you felt this warranted a response.In post 367, Meuh wrote:We have like 5 days left don’t we? Why not take full advantage of that time, if it gives us more infoIn post 365, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You're waiting on one player?In post 353, Carcalilly wrote:im very softly hoping andres will come back a lil later and provide something like they seem to be promising, so I don't mind waiting a few more days on that.
Soooo, you’re on the same page with monkey on what? The game being dead? That triad of players? Just one of them? Your activity may be NI but vaguery can most certainly be.In post 363, Titus wrote:Interesting. It's almost if Monkey knows what I am struggling with.In post 349, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Yeah it's been pretty dead overall. I would support Ger, Moose, or Andres wagons at this point.
Do they though?In post 374, Gamma Emerald wrote:these prod timers kinda suck
This might possibly be the worst vote in this game, and that’s an achievement.In post 415, Titus wrote:VOTE: ScorpiousIn post 412, Scorpious wrote:I don’t like the moose wagon right now and I’m almost assured there is at least one scum there right now.
1) shades major wagon
2) has no vote elsewhere
A large wagon is likely to have scum. Scorpious doesn't say why he hates the wagon or who would be better. It's the opposite of helping the game move forward.
They’re 2000 and late..In post 435, Titus wrote:You're 2008. How do you not know masons?In post 434, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Maybe I misinterpreted that with another role.
Last thing because this is so bad..In post 415, Titus wrote:VOTE: ScorpiousIn post 412, Scorpious wrote:I don’t like the moose wagon right now and I’m almost assured there is at least one scum there right now.
1) shades major wagon
2) has no vote elsewhere
A large wagon is likely to have scum. Scorpious doesn't say why he hates the wagon or who would be better. It's the opposite of helping the game move forward.
Far from it.In post 447, Crescent wrote:Actually to go further, I just don't like that entire post. That's OMGUS for you.
But also, when I thought it was Cara for some reason, the issue I had is I felt voting Moose and Scorpious soon after was establishing a clear pattern of avoiding Andres. This was obviously incorrect as she did not place that vote.
Titus has pinged off of something interesting though: No one has said the Moose wagon was bad without giving an actual reason to call it bad anywhere near as much as Scorpious has consistently done.
I gave the reason I dislike it just now: I think it's an easy possible distraction from Andres doing even less than that slot has. I'm not sure he's ever given a serious reason.
I remember not particularly trusting Scorpious early, but then someone said he was acting very differently to how he did his last game where he was scum. Who was that?
You also know I’m easy limbait. So there is also that…In post 459, Titus wrote:Scorpious, you've been shopping me with no real action on me until I voted you. It's the definition of OMGUS and the fact you deny it is fishy.
Nothing shady about an OMGUS but your guilt is shady.
If you think that level of push is up to your standard, then that alone is fishy.In post 459, Titus wrote:Scorpious, you've been shopping me with no real action on me until I voted you. It's the definition of OMGUS and the fact you deny it is fishy.
Nothing shady about an OMGUS but your guilt is shady.
So your 2 reasons for voting me.. you stand behind those? Because I don’t like the wagon that I have said I see as opportunistic and I’m not advancing the game. One is an opinion and one is just wrong..In post 463, Titus wrote:So I should ignore you being obviously scummy because you describe yourself as limbait? Ok. I'll get right on that. [/s]In post 461, Scorpious wrote:You also know I’m easy limbait. So there is also that…In post 459, Titus wrote:Scorpious, you've been shopping me with no real action on me until I voted you. It's the definition of OMGUS and the fact you deny it is fishy.
Nothing shady about an OMGUS but your guilt is shady.
I questioned your activity because there was none of it…In post 464, Titus wrote:Then do it. Case me with three paragraphs about why my push is inadequate in a dead game.In post 462, Scorpious wrote:If you think that level of push is up to your standard, then that alone is fishy.In post 459, Titus wrote:Scorpious, you've been shopping me with no real action on me until I voted you. It's the definition of OMGUS and the fact you deny it is fishy.
Nothing shady about an OMGUS but your guilt is shady.
That’s not something you would do without an alterior motive.
If it was honest it would be a 3 paragraph long, substantially fact based push.
This was weak and lazy
While you're at it, explain why most of your mentions of mebefore my vote on youfocus on exclusively my activity which you stated was NAI. Why didn't you say something then to give power to a slow game?
What does this even mean?In post 469, Titus wrote:You claim lazy and thren you say never win. You're moving your own votes to deny content.In post 466, Scorpious wrote:I’m not going to 1v1 you.
I’ll never win, but I would love to see how adamant you want to get here.