Open 96 -- Carbon-14 (Game over) before 703
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
Yeah, but Nat self-votes in his first post in every game he's ever in. It's not just that he has an anti-town meta; it's that he doesStrangerCoug wrote:I didn't want to run Natirasha up too fast because of it. I am aware of Nat's general anti-town meta, but the last completed game I played with him, he openly admitted being the serial killer.that, specifically.- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
*headdesk*Kublai Khan wrote:I'm back.
Is Crazy's vote random or is he sincerely grasping at straws?
Why does a vote have to either be for a completely random reason or a completely real reason? It's the random phase, any reason that goes evenslightlypast "He has a funny avatar LOLZ" is better than a random vote.
So, yeah, I don't support putting all votes in two distinct categories. My vote on SC is probably what you'd consider in between "completely random LOLZ" and "SC is scum. Lynch him."
Also, I have done semi-random votes twice in the past... both times I actually picked scum! (Mini 614 - SleepyPanda and Open 94 - orangepenguin). Though that doesn't mean anything, of course.
I can agree with ortolan for all purposes of Day 1 wagons. Day 2 and further targets should be claimed but role shouldnot.- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
The person who mentioned Nat always self-votes, I think it was me.
To be honest, I wasn't actually looking for an answer from KK about why he asked the question. *shrug* That's just how I talk sometimes, using questions and such. I have some weird opinions about mafia, and how I deal with the RVS is one of them.
SC's aggression is not reason to vote for him. Spreading suspicion around is what we'resupposedto do, after all. His original case against KK; however, is scummy.
It sums up to...
1) Using the newbie card in a quote that was taken mainly out of context.
The bolded is all SC quoted. The rest of the post makes it clear that he was just talking about not knowing me, not being a newbie to mafia or anything.KK wrote:Because I'm new here and I don't know you.Does it really bug you that much that someone you've never met or played with is asking you to clarify your reason for voting?
If you want the random segment to end and scum-hunting to begin, then eventually some semi-serious questions have to start being asked.
2) That comment about Stoofer, which is not scummy in any way you look at it.
2)- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
SC is way worse than Xtoxm.
And yes, I do find ortolan scummy.
First 7 posts are content-free, which is fine in the random stage, but he's also joking about being scum, like the comment about the quicklynches and the mass claim, etc. Now most people don't see this is a scum-tell, but I read jokes like that as "Hi, I'm scum and I'm so excited that I'm scum that I can't conceal it." Sure, it's not a strong tell by any means, but it's in my book.
His next post is about theory, which is a null-tell.
The post after that is what gets me. He reiterates the veryvalidpoints against SC, but then in the last sentence:
Ugh. You know what that means. Likely he either doesn't want to distance too strongly against SC, or he's afraid of a counterattack. Either way, it's scummy.ortolan wrote: I'll be the first to admit the case against you isn't particularly strong, but in the absence of a better suspect and as I am obliged to post after being prodded I will go with you for the time being.
And I notice he just posted again while I was typing this... voting for Xtoxm... and asking for aclaimof all things!- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
Hmm, I better explain why I don't think the Xtoxm case has merit:
The case against him:
1. He's avoiding this game.
Well, so what? We're on page 4. It'sreallynot time to go after lurkers yet. Look, Nat has posted 24 times since his last post here. Why is Xtoxm more suspicious?
2. Post 83 implies he is scum.
Xtoxm is not a newbie... and newbies are the only kind of people that would give upon page 3.- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
Wow, I was so ready to lynch Nat, but it's obvious at this point that one of SC/Popshasto be scum. Let's just check if there are any counter-claims. Possible scenarios:
1. SC is scum; the real seer will counter-claim.
2. Pops is scum; his partner will counter-claim, attempting to get SC lynched for a win.
3. Pops is scum; his partner will not counter-claim, thinking he has a better chance of winning in a final 3 situation.
Thus, if there's no counter-claim, we can be sure that Pops is scum.
I do not counter-claim.- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
- Crazy
-
Crazy Mafia Scum
- Crazy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Location: Somewhere
Woah, crazy game there.
I don't think what SC did at the end was unethical. He was about as confirmed scum as you can be. There was really nothing he could do to possibly win.
Umm, KK, if someone claims like that, counter-claim themimmediately. By your lack of a counter-claim in your posts after SC, I had already thought that you couldn't be the seer. If this wasn't a special case (with pops flipping the wrong kind of scum and all), and you claimed that late, I would assume that you were scum.
SC's gambit was awesome, and really itshouldhave worked, but failed due to some unforeseen matters (KK delaying his claim; the quick wagon on pops)
-SC claims seer, guilty on pops.
-Real seer counter-claimed.
-SC is scummy, so he's lynched instead.
-Real seer is killed at night.
-Pops is nearly confirmed on Day 3. - Crazy
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy
- Crazy