definitely rolled mafia thenIn post 12, froggodoggo wrote:If you mean SK, then no did you?
VOTE: froggo
definitely rolled mafia thenIn post 12, froggodoggo wrote:If you mean SK, then no did you?
In post 52, furtiveglance wrote:Ok, I actually didn't see that froggo voted Infinity.
Why? They seem fine?In post 53, furtiveglance wrote:I just found them sus
I don't really have a read on you yet. I think a 4-vote wagon isn't that out of the ordinary for RVS. Does it bother you for some reason?In post 56, froggodoggo wrote:but no comment about the larger wagon on me? that your own RVS vote is supporting?In post 55, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:They seem fine?
It's very unclear to me how (b) follows from or is related to (a)In post 61, froggodoggo wrote:IMO the (a) "they seem fine" seems defensive of furtive putting pressure on infinity -- (b) which is contradictory to a 4-vote wagon being normal
Why were you scumreading Infinity when you placed your vote there?In post 84, furtiveglance wrote:Not really, but the Infinity vote is already outdated because 4 ppl were on it super early. So I'm starting a new trend.In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:And do you have infinity as town?
Why not?In post 87, Lucian wrote:I'm starting to think froggo is Town. His questions seem odd to me, but I get the vibe he believes in them.
VOTE: Cat Scratch Fever
Not a fan of her Infinity vote.
How is this different from the other weak townreads that were being thrown out?In post 109, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It depends what you find interesting, I guess. I dislike your throwing out of town reads based on weak sauce.In post 105, Lucian wrote: Is this one gonna be more interesting than "you're being awkward"?
If I had to guess, town because the quick reevaluation from 36 to 90 comes from town more often than not.In post 177, Lucian wrote:CSF, what do you think of Infinity?
Instead of post 36, i meant to link 39In post 182, froggodoggo wrote:what's the re-evaluation?In post 181, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:If I had to guess, town because the quick reevaluation from 39 to 90 comes from town more often than not.In post 177, Lucian wrote:CSF, what do you think of Infinity?
their takes also feel okay, like i agree that you're towny
Why didn't you say froggo was a townread in 45?In post 188, furtiveglance wrote:Voting froggo who I TRed was a sus move, that's it really, but I've done a U-turn now.In post 174, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Why were you scumreading Infinity when you placed your vote there?In post 84, furtiveglance wrote:Not really, but the Infinity vote is already outdated because 4 ppl were on it super early. So I'm starting a new trend.In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:And do you have infinity as town?
What is your read on Lucian?In post 185, Aisa wrote:I thought froggo sounded towny. Was their tone maybe a little unusual? Yes, but in a way that was more likely to come from town I thought. With that in mind your page 1 push on him did seem a little awkward. From the vibe you gave off I pegged you for someone that should be able to recognise enthusiastic town - pr, if not enthusiastic town, a type of post that could easily come from enthusiastic town.
what do you think about the fact that BBT honed in on you for saying people were town on page 1, but not Aisa, who also said people were town on page 1?In post 196, Lucian wrote:The reason why I think BBT is Town is because "scum isn't more likely to be relaxed! That is completely NAI!!" is a very stupid hill to choose to die on as scum. Scum usually has a bit more self-awareness, he reads like a stubborn Townie to me.
I can kinda see thatIn post 244, Klick wrote:This was close to my initial thoughts upon seeing furtive's 202. Reading through the game Aisa posted though does make me feel like there's a pretty clear difference between there and here.I think there's a decent chance that furtive's alignment will become obvious over time, and there are better choices for a vote.
the lockdown read was exaggerated but had serious undertones 77In post 258, Lucian wrote:Nothing. I read that Aisa post as non-serious, so I didn't think anything of BBT not commenting on it.In post 240, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:what do you think about the fact that BBT honed in on you for saying people were town on page 1, but not Aisa, who also said people were town on page 1?In post 196, Lucian wrote:The reason why I think BBT is Town is because "scum isn't more likely to be relaxed! That is completely NAI!!" is a very stupid hill to choose to die on as scum. Scum usually has a bit more self-awareness, he reads like a stubborn Townie to me.
Wagon, I acknowledge theeIn post 341, furtiveglance wrote:What do you actually think of CSF then? They just voted Aisa without acknowledging the wagon on them, is that towny or scummy?
Did you ever go into this beyond vibes?In post 342, furtiveglance wrote:I'm feeling like CSF is scum.
It's also the furtive meta read, which ended up as a townread but then you immediately qualified itIn post 340, Aisa wrote:Just gonna come out and say that I see all this but I need to RL pretty hard tonight so not sure I'll have time to address this today
...which also explains why I got in made two easy posts and left
yeah that's fairIn post 352, furtiveglance wrote:349 is probably the most analysis I've seen from you this game. I voted you because I wasn't sure what your reads were or if you had any, which is instant partner equity with everyone. Then there's vote hopping which I don't really like in general. And when a few of my townreads hopped on, it made me think we'd all voted mafia together.In post 351, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Did you ever go into this beyond vibes?In post 342, furtiveglance wrote:I'm feeling like CSF is scum.
This surprises me nglIn post 383, Enchant wrote:Need to think before i vote.
I guess it pinged me, because you were cautioning against forming a TR at a low-info point of the game, when I think most (all?) town reads are implicitly qualified "...but they could still be scum here" if that makes senseIn post 440, Aisa wrote:This is a slightly harder one to explain because it was just one throwaway post. You know that feeling when you're town and make a slightly weak post, you know in the back of your head it's gonna land you in trouble, but it's all you feel like contributing at the time and lo and behold we're here now...? Yeah.In post 353, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:[...]
We can talk about Dunn if you'd like and what pinged you there
Anyway. Maybe I can explain why it pinged me this way: my reaction to any short post with a question is to think "hmm, even if this is a good question this does not preclude the poster being scum." I've kinda mentioned this in my post above, but recently I've been thinking a bit more with the framework of "could X still plausibly be scum here?" so that was on my mind when I was warning against reading too much into Dunn's few posts. "Gave me a bit of a scumping" was a slightly imprecise way of communicating what I was thinking at the time.
I have limited time, so this is going to basically be a fancy prodge until tomorrowIn post 443, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:This surprises me nglIn post 383, Enchant wrote:Need to think before i vote.
Come on now, Mala has done enough for a temporary townpass?In post 567, furtiveglance wrote:I'm going to bed now. Hiraki/Me/Lucian/Aisa/Froggo are the towncore, Dunnstral/Enchant/Infinity/Klick/Malakittens have done enough for a temporary townpass, BBT/CSF/GE contains the motherload of Impostors.
To be frank, if Enchant had said something silly like "I'm just waiting to yolo hammer," I probably would've shrugged it off as in-character for EnchantIn post 588, Lucian wrote: I looked at Terminator. From what I gathered, Enchant replaced into a hame, and within half an hour hammered a choice in that phase (after voting a different person for seemingly no reason too).
Yeah like a notes or personal PT. Where were you going with this questioning?In post 466, Dunnstral wrote:Is Aisa claiming that they have a pt where they post reaction images but nobody else is in it?
Why Mala over Enchant?In post 643, Dunnstral wrote:NoIn post 641, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Errr is that first sentence related to the Mala vote?
I don't disagree - that has typically been her meta. But very recently, she's been more inactive lately as town too presumably due to IRL, and I'm struggling to have any read beyond "null" on her this game.In post 656, Dunnstral wrote: Enchant is always low content so I have them as null. It is my belief that Mala tends to be lower content as mafia, and upon review of their iso their vote on Enchant comes after Enchant votes for them, and I'm not seeing a reason for it, plus the wagon was already going by then. I think Malakittens looks worse. I also think it's possible scum could be hiding behind "let's sheep the ic" to justify their votes today.
*pokes*
oh, it was a reaction test?In post 675, Klick wrote:I'm awareIn post 673, froggodoggo wrote:Klick u r currently voting the innocent child
Pagetop
You don’t have to agree with me!In post 795, Aisa wrote:But CSF complained about my furtive scumcase, so I was going to reconsider that.
What specifically made you think Enchant needs death?In post 855, Infinity 324 wrote:enchant needs to die and i think a night phase would help me get more engaged regardless