Uhp, hold on a second, folks..
[Off-screen whispering]
uhuh..
uhuh, yeah..
yeah alright, I'll tell them.
I did not. I have to read 37+ pages chock full of meaningless talk just to reaffirm my previously held beliefs.In post 915, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello. I hope you came to play.
Actually, I read Something_Smart's ISO first, then my slot.In post 1055, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You read your own slot first?
I know my own role, but I do not know my slot, or what they have done prior to being replaced. I find the notion that I should be left in the dark about what the previous inhabitant has done to be rather silly.In post 1068, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why did you choose to read your own slot first?
Is the Amish tell still a thing?
Are you saying I should leave myself open to being contradicted and blindsided by the prior tenant's actions?In post 1097, PenguinPower wrote:You also don't know the roles or what any other slot has done in the game - I find the notion that you care about a slot you do know the role of more than those you don't to be rather silly.In post 1095, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I know my own role, but I do not know my slot, or what they have done prior to being replaced. I find the notion that I should be left in the dark about what the previous inhabitant has done to be rather silly.In post 1068, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Why did you choose to read your own slot first?
Is the Amish tell still a thing?
I must admit it to everyone, that I have told a mistruth. I have not come to save your kind from the malevolent forces of the Mafia, but to instead destroy those whom appose our might. Fear not, your death will be swift and painless as I, lord of all that is evil and dark, shall slay this town like a pig.In post 1120, PenguinPower wrote:okay so scummy...and something that would be much better served iso'ing the slots that placed the votes.In post 1115, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I think the main reason why I wod ISO Froggo is to see if they claimed anything dumb that needs retracting and redacting. Another reason would be to see, with my own eyes, why froggo had 4ish votes accordion to the_worst's votecount.
got it.
An Amish tell is when one player defends another by attacking that player's attacker.In post 1129, Fun Times wrote:2 things:
1) Wtf is an Amish tell?
2) I think Jake repped into a scum slot.
VOTE: Jake
~Nancy
In vague and loose terms that only serve to unintentionally confuse you, yeah.In post 1135, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Can you explain that town read?
I thought scum's first thought is "I need to commit several murders, then evade my taxes."In post 1143, Not_Mafia wrote:Again, it's the fact that he felt the need to come in and immediately comment on froggo's play, it's a scum tell becuase scum's first thought is going to be how their slot is perceived, town is going to be concerned with finding scum :wink:In post 1116, Somnus wrote:Yeah I suppose.
1.)It's a game with a lot of cops and doctors. Could be checking to see if there was a check his predecessor had made (if he had a night 1 role) rather than assuming people would have informed him of such a thing when he replaced in.
2.) Maybe he just has a weird style of approaching the game, particularly as a replace in?
3.) Wanted to first understand why his predecessor had votes on them before catching up?
I don't know. I'm not really interested in, nor have a reason in defending him. He just replaced in and assuming he's caught up tomorrow, I'd like to hear his reads.
whats a chainsawIn post 1146, Not_Mafia wrote:No that's chainsawing :mad: But you knew that didn't you :wink:In post 1130, Jake The Wolfie wrote:An Amish tell is when one player defends another by attacking that player's attacker.In post 1129, Fun Times wrote:2 things:
1) Wtf is an Amish tell?
2) I think Jake repped into a scum slot.
VOTE: Jake
~Nancy
I am a man of moral upstanding, one whom is devout and faithful to YHWH. Your hearsay shall ruin you, cursed be your family to the fourth and fifth generation, they shall live rich lives, but shall die before the Lord!In post 1151, Not_Mafia wrote:I’m sorry :( But I just can’t engage with someone who doesn’t play this game in good faith :cry: It just goes against my moral principles
Not yet, although people are wanting to eliminate me for reasons they won't let me decipher.In post 1153, Bellaphant wrote:Have we had a recent vc? I'm down to elim Jake.
I'm confused as to why players are voting my slot prior to my replacement. I see nothing inherently wrong with what they have proclaimed.In post 1155, Bellaphant wrote:You aren't telling me anything about the game state. Where's your head at, what are your takes?
I did give you an answer. I am confused, bamboozled, betwixed, comprehendn't of what is going on, and I've hit a brick wall when it comes to why others voted my slot.In post 1158, Bellaphant wrote:That's not an answer. What do you think about the game.
I'm about to vote you. Not 'your slot '.
Excellent. A checklist for who's actually voting me.In post 1191, Something_Smart wrote:Jake The Wolfie (4)- Not_Mafia, PenguinPower, Nancy Drew 39, BlueBloodedToffee
sine wile e ni tan seme?!?!
I could also use sitelen pona to be even more useless if you'd hate.In post 1225, PenguinPower wrote:be great if jake stopped using a fake language to convey information
I thought I got misaxed because I was not at all active in the game.In post 1233, Gamma Emerald wrote:this is why you got miselimed in the holy grail game dude
Are you asking about what is going on right now? I haven't read up recent history, but I have posted my armchair analysis on the first few pages of the game.In post 1239, PenguinPower wrote:How about this game? Thoughts on this game?
Could you elaborate on this point?In post 1241, Gamma Emerald wrote:ngl your armchair analysis sucks and looks agenda-driven
Fuck you're right, they are dead. mb, didn't notice that until nowIn post 1244, Gamma Emerald wrote:your TRs thru page 6 are 2 dead town and a rando, and your opinion on BBT looks like setting up to push him once you're caght upIn post 1243, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Could you elaborate on this point?In post 1241, Gamma Emerald wrote:ngl your armchair analysis sucks and looks agenda-driven
If you were to take a bone saw and grind into my skull, you would see that it's all bone and no brain.In post 1248, Gamma Emerald wrote:you said you read the mod ISO, I feel like that makes it a reasonable assumtion that you know the flips
I thought I already admitted to this. I'm not sure why you lot haven't already killed me yet.
Sure, what did you have in mind?In post 1260, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Jake, would love some expansion on those Penguin and Bella reads.
As far as I'm aware, Goldfish hasn't even posted yet. I would find it extremely difficult to read someone who has failed to speak a single word.In post 1264, Enchant wrote:24 hours passed!
Did you miss me? Of course you do!
Also why Goldfish is gray in this readlist, but not Somnus?
Not especially. I'm no expert, but I think that scum have a wide variety of plays that they can and do make. If they were to be put onto a wagon and forced onto my radar (or if they were in a past that I haven't reached yet) then we could evaluate them better. Right now I'm unconvinced either way.In post 1265, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Do you find that scummy?
For clarity, do you think scum try not to make waves and draw too much attention?
In post 1268, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Bella was first to vote Ali after noting scum reads from myself and Ausuka.
What do you think about that?
What do you think about Penguin's lack of scum reads?
I'm not sure where I would have found them. Could you give me a few pointers?In post 1285, PenguinPower wrote:You have my reads though.In post 1281, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If we can't get your reads, could we at least get a reason for why?
It was. Now is not the time to claim scum and die, now is the time to not claim scum and not die.In post 1289, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:So, I’m confused now, was this a troll?In post 1251, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I thought I already admitted to this. I'm not sure why you lot haven't already killed me yet.
Do they though? I don't see it.In post 1390, Somnus wrote:This baggage you're carrying from our last game isn't doing you any good. There's a reason half the playerlist doesn't bother to engage with you. You approach every conversation like a screaming toddler. This is about the extent of time I care to waste on you today. Enjoy your day.In post 1388, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm flattered you think I'm obsessed with you.
Thanks for proving my point about you being no loss to town though, I guess.
I feel like it's true, however I am not familiar with their scumgame, as you yourself imply that you are. Mayhaps you could see for yourself if their play matches with their scumplay.In post 1412, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is a “big if true” comment because I think this description resembles Enchant’s scumgameIn post 1379, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Most of their posts are needless and witless rabble, seemingly only for the hell of it. Just skim over their ISO and you'll see what I mean.
Of course! They're my favorite comedy duo!In post 1444, Enchant wrote:You know about bait and switch?
Reported due to lack of emotes. Yer gonna get banned, m8In post 1459, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 1454, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Would you mind, NM?In post 1439, Bellaphant wrote: @nm, some reads please?Not_Mafia
FunTimes
Somnus
BlueBloodedToffee
GammaEmerald
PenguinPower
NorwegianboyEE
Bellaphant
GoldfishFromTheMoon
Enchant
JakeTheWolfie