In post 131, Aisa wrote:Suppose I kill Herta. I probably can't push Meg anymore, so I would have to convince Meg that Aus is scum. If Aus were scum though, playing with me and Meg would probably be the least favourable combination for them, and I just don't think I could sell that Aus would do that. So Herta needs to stay alive.
I still don't know what the optimal night kill was, for the record. What if it was Herta?
Me: haha look how inactive it is. I'm feeling peckish, just gonna go for a late night cucumber (literally) and after that's done be the first to post today and I will look so towny
Me now back from my trip to the fridge: whoops
ALSO NOTE TO SELF I NEED TO VOTE HERTA IN THE NEXT POST!!
Me yesterday: haha yes I am no newbscum and when Ausuka fails to hammer, I will definitely vote for Herta right afterwards
Me today, for a second: oh uuh I guess maybe "tunnelling" Herta could backfire, maybe I need to start thinking about how I can fake sort Aus?
Note to self, if anyone asks my excuse is that I *knew* Meg was trying to soft something on day 2 which is why I ignored it, and I was confused as to why Meg was still alive, which is why I was sussing them on day 3!
I did purposefully not react to Meg on day 2 and then forgot all about that on day 3, so it's mostly convenient that it has turned out this way, but also, this feels like a pretty good excuse!
...Actually that's pretty good, I might just go and point it out in main thread
Oooops back track I just realised my posting history is not compatible with that excuse. That's what I get for not doing my homework.
It's ok, it's ok, the whole point of this is hopefully to get Ausuka to think that not killing Meg points more to Herta than to me and that still has a chance of happening. Or maybe they'll call my bluff. Who knows.
By the way, my head canon is that Johnny is reading every single word in here and cheering me on c:
Hi if you're out there
Maybe if my fake townspew/fake analysis was better, or if I sounded charming enough, or pocketed Aus enough, or if I interacted enough in real time I could secure this victory, but it feels like I'm already doing what I can on those fronts.
...In hindsight maybe NKs exist for a reason and that reason is to at least occasionally NK people who scumread you
In post 653, Ausuka wrote:I promise I will engage with the points you raised as well, Aisa! I just had limited time tonight so wanted to go through the first things that came to mind. I'll try to make time tomorrow afternoon for this after my lectures
You're a saint and don't deserve this amount of pressure T_T
In post 667, Herta wrote:I can't seem to quote 638 correctly but there aisa repeats that Juice was an easy push. Okay was it scummy because it was easy or was it scummy for some other reason? And when someone was playing as anti-town as Juice was why was it scummy at all? No one could have known Juice was going to self-hammer, but doing so is indicative of the frame of mind Juice was in when going through that whole reaction test thing. There was no town motivation in that whatsoever near as I can tell.
I just have to disagree with you the more I look at it ausuka. What I said was with about as much confidence as I've ever had on a player I was pretty sure was maf. If I were scum I sure wouldn't have attacked juice, voted him and encouraged other votes on him so boldly.
The incredible serendipity of mafia is getting townread for things you were never expecting to get townread for, while watching all the excuses that were supposed to be town about you crumble faster than a sandcastle. ^^
I'm like
does me making a longer post even do anything? If it does I will write one, but somehow I doubt Ausuka's thought process is "wow Aisa's word cound count is greater than Herta's, so she is town"
so
why make wall post
when I can avoid wall post
