I CC kitty.
VOTE: Crescent
There are no SKs inIn post 23, Wayward Son wrote:I was just over in the wiki reading up on what to expect in a Normal, when I read that Serial Killers are normal!? AND show as vanilla if role copped? Wow.
I save my gutty reads until a bit later, usually.In post 35, Porkens wrote:I used to do gutty townreads and scumreads page 1 and they were almost always wrong
Why?In post 72, geraintm wrote:This gets a voteIn post 48, Galron wrote:Nightmare scenario would be geraintm/crscent/malcom
VOTE: galron
Town vibes.In post 131, Wayward Son wrote:I feel so forgotten! lolIn post 130, Salsabil Faria wrote:Recently NJAC, Kitty and I completed a newbie game (Newbie-2100) where scum!Kitty was playing dumb townie and NJAC caught him for that.
True that though. I'd like to hear Kitty's take on Porkens.
I'm here.In post 124, NJAC wrote:It matters. I'm waiting for Kitty to show up.In post 123, Crescent wrote:If the vote actually mattered you'd be explaining why it mattered in this post.In post 119, NJAC wrote:Why is my vote irrelevant? Just because you said you don't vote early, it doesn't mean other players cannot make something useful with our votes.
Yeah. This post seems townie, for the record.In post 160, NJAC wrote:Yes, I can see that. In the last game we played you said you use to do better when players are active and there's enough content. Do you think this is the case? Is there enough content and people are being active enough in this game for you to try to solve the game?In post 137, KittyTacky wrote:I'm here.In post 124, NJAC wrote: It matters. I'm waiting for Kitty to show up.
In post 193, ProfessorDrapion wrote:I have you know mafia if you don’t ml me today you never will cause I’ll bury you in the following days with a big grin on my face.
3 would be OP with 11 players. Maybe a traitor.In post 225, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Salsa automatically assuming for there to be only 2 wolves is concerning.In post 221, Galron wrote:I like Professor Galron better but no.In post 217, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 201, Shiidaji wrote:In case it's not clear I think Salsa is town now
Galron should really be voting Drapion right nowHmm...Galron-Professorteam can be plausible.
Shiidajigoes to my null-list for now.
I'm sharing them as they come up.In post 309, Salsabil Faria wrote:
@Kitty, this game is more active than the previous one... where are your thoughts?
Isn't "fine, kill me" a scumtell?In post 316, ProfessorDrapion wrote:That’s super dumb.In post 301, Wayward Son wrote:I have a tinfoil theory. It's Professor and Porkens. (Assuming scum) Professor took a lot of time to defend Porkens. Porkens' "gut" vote on me is an attempt to start a different wagon.
It may be thin, but I see it.
VOTE: ProfessorDrapion
I am town here.
But I’m ok with dying for the record.
It's not even a variant, it's the same game with different role and faction names.In post 369, MalcolmTucker wrote:Werewolf is a variant of mafia so it's basically saying scum flip.In post 361, geraintm wrote:wo is this aimed at?In post 324, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Do you think Galron clears Wayward upon wolf flip?
That would be handy.
Thoughts?
what is a wolf flip?
They could just be a weird townie but I think they have at least scum equity.In post 378, NJAC wrote:What's your opinion on what I said that ProfessorDrapion's erratic behavior might not come from scum?In post 373, KittyTacky wrote:If anyone has any questions aimed at me, ask them.
Sorry I misinterpreted it as the former, your phrasing was odd.In post 381, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Don’t think so but I never said “fine, kill me”In post 371, KittyTacky wrote:Isn't "fine, kill me" a scumtell?In post 316, ProfessorDrapion wrote:That’s super dumb.In post 301, Wayward Son wrote:I have a tinfoil theory. It's Professor and Porkens. (Assuming scum) Professor took a lot of time to defend Porkens. Porkens' "gut" vote on me is an attempt to start a different wagon.
It may be thin, but I see it.
VOTE: ProfessorDrapion
I am town here.
But I’m ok with dying for the record.
I said “IDRC if I do die I’m fine with it.”
Just because I am diect doesn't mean I should lie about how sure I am of my reads.In post 387, Shiidaji wrote: Little impression of Kitty based on his posts on page 12 and successive Drapion vote. "Vote not final but" in post 300 sounds a little self-conscious coming from a direct personality like Kitty which is the only thing that stuck out to me.
After he answers my question.In post 390, Shiidaji wrote:Wanna vote Galron with us?In post 373, KittyTacky wrote:If anyone has any questions aimed at me, ask them.
Why Malcolm?In post 384, Galron wrote:Oh yeah I'm here just haven't felt like playing.
UNVOTE: wayward was rvs. Probably voting Drap or maybe Malcom today.
I'm town.
I'm town.
I meant the question I was about to ask.In post 470, Galron wrote:Kitty if you're talking about a question you had previously posed I can't seem to find it. I feel I'm being gaslighted.In post 430, KittyTacky wrote:After he answers my question.In post 390, Shiidaji wrote:Wanna vote Galron with us?In post 373, KittyTacky wrote:If anyone has any questions aimed at me, ask them.
That's kinda how Malcolm plays as town. A bit wishy-washy.In post 472, Galron wrote:I'm not really seeing a process there. And there's a whole lot of "well you seem like you could be town or scum" and that doesn't really sit well. There was a post or two wrt geraintm where he had expressed a hard town read and then rolled it back the more he got into the post.In post 431, KittyTacky wrote:Why Malcolm?In post 384, Galron wrote:Oh yeah I'm here just haven't felt like playing.
UNVOTE: wayward was rvs. Probably voting Drap or maybe Malcom today.
Not only was I getting pushed a lot in 2277 which always jolts me awake as town, I was a strong PR there.In post 491, Crescent wrote:Kitty's effort level kinda pales in comparison to 2277, both in post count and the average length of the posts, though 2277 was a bit odd in that someone had a train like almost all day and it just never died.
Imma check out 2100 though.
2267? I was literally an autoconfirm role and then saw red when Scorpious claimed a role that was incompatible with mine.In post 496, Wayward Son wrote:I remember reading a game where Kitty had a PR, in that game he was more relevant and posted more. I don't remember which game it was though, maybe Kitty remembers.In post 492, Crescent wrote:...Kind of just a wash for me.
It seems he's trying in this game. He is a hard read.
pedit "And it's not a good question. Drapion defending Porkens early on shouldn't have any influence of whether someone town reads or scum reads Porkens now. The fact that you're calling them scum together already means you can attack almost any potential answer to the question, hence it having no "good" answer." Greeting actually did this very thing in 2100 with Kitty. I still see it as possible.
Yeah.In post 525, Wayward Son wrote:Kitty seems to have missed the claim at first, so there's that.
I did, and he answered.In post 565, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 540, KittyTacky wrote:I meant the question I was about to ask.In post 470, Galron wrote:Kitty if you're talking about a question you had previously posed I can't seem to find it. I feel I'm being gaslighted.In post 430, KittyTacky wrote:After he answers my question.In post 390, Shiidaji wrote:Wanna vote Galron with us?In post 373, KittyTacky wrote:If anyone has any questions aimed at me, ask them.Then ask, what are ypu waiting for?
Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 472, Galron wrote:I'm not really seeing a process there. And there's a whole lot of "well you seem like you could be town or scum" and that doesn't really sit well. There was a post or two wrt geraintm where he had expressed a hard town read and then rolled it back the more he got into the post.In post 431, KittyTacky wrote:Why Malcolm?In post 384, Galron wrote:Oh yeah I'm here just haven't felt like playing.
UNVOTE: wayward was rvs. Probably voting Drap or maybe Malcom today.They shows more thought process than you...
And go into day 2 basically blind? There's no guarantee we will have an investigative guilty day 2. A flip is needed to provide some concrete information to base a solve off of unless you are a god at this game.geraintm wrote:Day 1 eliminations are more than likely to end in thr death of town - scum should be able to easily direct the vote to someone they want. Why give scum a free death? Why allow them to get claims out townies they run up?In post 554, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 465, geraintm wrote:I'm not going to jump to a wagon unless I think they are more likely to be scum. Its day 1, I'm happy with no eliminationIn post 460, MalcolmTucker wrote:It surely matters if you're going to sit on a wagon nobody else is interested in pursuing to make it look like a committed town read because as Crescent has suggested it's a way for scum to avoid having to make miseliminations. If your read on me was solid I'd at least understand it but your scumread is quite frankly not very good and I think it's right for other players to begin to wonder what angle you're pursuing it from if you have little interest in eliminating anyone else.In post 453, geraintm wrote:does it matter if you dont think anyone else is going to join me?In post 435, NJAC wrote:@geraintm I think your case on Malcolm is going nowhere, who else are you considering to vote?Wut?? Since when no elimination in D1 is good for town???
One flip isn't enough is what I meant. Especially a flip selected by scum. Also I'd rather have info from claims.In post 599, geraintm wrote:Not blind. I cut think of a game where town doesn't get some info night 1.In post 567, KittyTacky wrote:I did, and he answered.In post 565, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 540, KittyTacky wrote:I meant the question I was about to ask.In post 470, Galron wrote:Kitty if you're talking about a question you had previously posed I can't seem to find it. I feel I'm being gaslighted.In post 430, KittyTacky wrote:After he answers my question.In post 390, Shiidaji wrote:Wanna vote Galron with us?In post 373, KittyTacky wrote:If anyone has any questions aimed at me, ask them.Then ask, what are ypu waiting for?
In fact, you just responded to his response.
Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 472, Galron wrote:I'm not really seeing a process there. And there's a whole lot of "well you seem like you could be town or scum" and that doesn't really sit well. There was a post or two wrt geraintm where he had expressed a hard town read and then rolled it back the more he got into the post.In post 431, KittyTacky wrote:Why Malcolm?In post 384, Galron wrote:Oh yeah I'm here just haven't felt like playing.
UNVOTE: wayward was rvs. Probably voting Drap or maybe Malcom today.They shows more thought process than you...And go into day 2 basically blind? There's no guarantee we will have an investigative guilty day 2. A flip is needed to provide some concrete information to base a solve off of unless you are a god at this game.geraintm wrote:Day 1 eliminations are more than likely to end in thr death of town - scum should be able to easily direct the vote to someone they want. Why give scum a free death? Why allow them to get claims out townies they run up?In post 554, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 465, geraintm wrote:I'm not going to jump to a wagon unless I think they are more likely to be scum. Its day 1, I'm happy with no eliminationIn post 460, MalcolmTucker wrote:It surely matters if you're going to sit on a wagon nobody else is interested in pursuing to make it look like a committed town read because as Crescent has suggested it's a way for scum to avoid having to make miseliminations. If your read on me was solid I'd at least understand it but your scumread is quite frankly not very good and I think it's right for other players to begin to wonder what angle you're pursuing it from if you have little interest in eliminating anyone else.In post 453, geraintm wrote:does it matter if you dont think anyone else is going to join me?In post 435, NJAC wrote:@geraintm I think your case on Malcolm is going nowhere, who else are you considering to vote?Wut?? Since when no elimination in D1 is good for town???
Plus, we have one more town player! And scum haven't been given any info of players forced to claim. I think townnwould do better
In post 603, MalcolmTucker wrote:I've seen Gera do this no elimination on D1 thing before but my issue at the moment is they weren't particularly bothered about it early on and appeared to be genuinely scumhunting, whereas now they seriously want to avoid us voting while we look to consolidate on Galron's wagon.
Given the short period of time we have left I think I'm content vote here. But town should obviously be careful as we'll be approaching hammer soon, think my vote is the 4th.
VOTE: Galron
If you are a PR and die while claiming "town" I will be very sad.In post 743, Wayward Son wrote:Hey, I'm cool being launched. Hopefully I help (later) launching scum.
My claim is Town. That's ALL you get.
Maybe see some of you in the dead thread later. I'll be there.
I have trauma from Discord Mafia and Town of Salem.In post 755, MalcolmTucker wrote:I don't see why Wayward wouldn't admit to their role if they're PR here? Likely they are either just vanilla town or scum.In post 752, KittyTacky wrote:If you are a PR and die while claiming "town" I will be very sad.In post 743, Wayward Son wrote:Hey, I'm cool being launched. Hopefully I help (later) launching scum.
My claim is Town. That's ALL you get.
Maybe see some of you in the dead thread later. I'll be there.
DUMBTOWNIE, YOU ARE ON TRIAL FOR CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE TOWN. WHAT IS YOUR DEFENSE?In post 775, KittyTacky wrote:I have trauma from Discord Mafia and Town of Salem.In post 755, MalcolmTucker wrote:I don't see why Wayward wouldn't admit to their role if they're PR here? Likely they are either just vanilla town or scum.In post 752, KittyTacky wrote:If you are a PR and die while claiming "town" I will be very sad.In post 743, Wayward Son wrote:Hey, I'm cool being launched. Hopefully I help (later) launching scum.
My claim is Town. That's ALL you get.
Maybe see some of you in the dead thread later. I'll be there.
Wayward is not scummy to me. Neither is gera. I refuse to vote someone who I don't think is scummy.In post 825, Galron wrote:Geraintm needs to ditch the vanity wagon. Kitty too.In post 787, Greeting wrote:Wayward Son (5): Porkens, ProfessorDrapion, Galron, Salsabil Faria, Shiidaji (E-1)
geraintm (3): Wayward Son, Crescent, NJAC
Galron (1): KittyTacky
MalcolmTucker (1): geraintm
Porkens (1): MalcolmTucker
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to eliminate.
Day 1 ends in: 0 days, 10 hours, 8 minutes.
1. I'm stating a fact, gera genuinely thinks this is the best play as town. I vetoed because I felt there were better lim targets than someone who was literally null.In post 946, MalcolmTucker wrote:In post 719, KittyTacky wrote:In post 603, MalcolmTucker wrote:I've seen Gera do this no elimination on D1 thing before but my issue at the moment is they weren't particularly bothered about it early on and appeared to be genuinely scumhunting, whereas now they seriously want to avoid us voting while we look to consolidate on Galron's wagon.
Given the short period of time we have left I think I'm content vote here. But town should obviously be careful as we'll be approaching hammer soon, think my vote is the 4th.
VOTE: Galron
VOTE: Galron
I veto gera, they play day 1 like this as town, they're at worst null, kill Galron today.Is there any reason Ger/Kitty can't be a possible team here as well? Kitty's not gotten too much scrutiny so far but hasn't done much to convince me they're town.In post 720, KittyTacky wrote:Gera is always anti-town day 1 even if they're not scum.
Note the "veto" here - again part of the difficulty with Ger's approach is it's often hard to read D1 but when we were reaching a point where compromise was potentially necessary, why was Kitty so against Ger being eliminated? If they always play like this D1 then it has to be acknowledged that can encompass scum games.
Kitty's determination to push Galron has at least been consistent but also feels like the sort of single-minded logic scum can sometimes get into to ensure they look like they have a strong and driven push. It doesn't feel like Kitty is that open to alternatives to the point where they're basing their other solves almost exclusively on whoever is likely to be paired with Galron, without providing evidence (so far) for who that is likely to be.
1. It changed because I don't like when town tries to essentially policy lim someone.In post 947, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'd also argue Kitty's tone re Ger changed significantly once the wagon on the slot started to gain some momentum.In post 555, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah I should have mentioned that gera is weird, they don't give a damn about the game day 1 and basically become Not_Mafia until D2. That's why I'm hesitant to vote them.
At first they were merely hesitant due to playstyle; then hesitancy turned into a hard veto. They compared Ger's early play to Not_Mafia but when stuck in previous games there have been occasions where NM has basically been treated like a policy lim.
Kitty stayed on Galron and clearly wasn't particularly confident about eliminating Wayward - but why not fight for that slot as well? Especially when they admitted their read on Ger was no more than "null".
I'm town.In post 956, NJAC wrote:Agree. Not sure about Kitty, though.In post 913, Salsabil Faria wrote:My POE is{Professor,Porkens,Shiidaji,Galron,geraintm}(in no particular order) by creating the town-block including{NJAC,Malcolm,Kitty}
I'm sheeping Malcolm who sheeped Crescent.In post 986, NJAC wrote:Can you please summarize your case on Galron?In post 943, KittyTacky wrote:I think whoever steered the wagon away from Galron is scum with Galron.
VOTE: Galron
IMO this makes sense, I played with town Galron and he's not this much of a contentless lurker.In post 595, Crescent wrote:The previous post sums up exactly why I'm not against voting Porkens. Barring a full-on town confirmation. players like him almost always get voted off eventually. It's a matter of when, not if.
But here's a fun fact: Galron really has arguably done evenlessthan Porkens has, he just hasn't been as obvious about it. He has given exactly one reason to suspect Drapion (#179), said he's voting him or Malcolm is #384, and given exactly one reason to suspect Malcolm (#472). That's... Really it.
Porkers may be doing next to nothing, but his approach to Wayward, as much as I had to pull teeth to get him to actually elaborate on anything, is more than we've gotten out of Galron. Porkens is failing, but Galron feels like he's totally lurking from commitment.
I feel like we have circled around this train while discussing trains to oppose it, while most people seem to agree everyone voting him is town, while the player the train is on hasn't given us any reason to look away him. I have yet to see anything that resembles true, game-solving thought process, and he's the lowest poster in the entire game, who has done effectively nothing since September 13th.
As I said before, town!Malcolm is a little wishy-washy.Porkens wrote:Not able to post yet but brief skim and Malcom looks pretty scum. Beating a dead horse in grandiose fashion.
Yeah but they don't do this to this extent as town.In post 991, MalcolmTucker wrote:I feel like I've seen Galron generally play this way as either alignment? Sometimes they've been more active but never tends to be a dominant figure in games.In post 988, KittyTacky wrote:I'm sheeping Malcolm who sheeped Crescent.In post 986, NJAC wrote:Can you please summarize your case on Galron?In post 943, KittyTacky wrote:I think whoever steered the wagon away from Galron is scum with Galron.
VOTE: GalronIMO this makes sense, I played with town Galron and he's not this much of a contentless lurker.In post 595, Crescent wrote:The previous post sums up exactly why I'm not against voting Porkens. Barring a full-on town confirmation. players like him almost always get voted off eventually. It's a matter of when, not if.
But here's a fun fact: Galron really has arguably done evenlessthan Porkens has, he just hasn't been as obvious about it. He has given exactly one reason to suspect Drapion (#179), said he's voting him or Malcolm is #384, and given exactly one reason to suspect Malcolm (#472). That's... Really it.
Porkers may be doing next to nothing, but his approach to Wayward, as much as I had to pull teeth to get him to actually elaborate on anything, is more than we've gotten out of Galron. Porkens is failing, but Galron feels like he's totally lurking from commitment.
I feel like we have circled around this train while discussing trains to oppose it, while most people seem to agree everyone voting him is town, while the player the train is on hasn't given us any reason to look away him. I have yet to see anything that resembles true, game-solving thought process, and he's the lowest poster in the entire game, who has done effectively nothing since September 13th.
I think Professor is town too, Galron just hid in the shadows while two townies were being run up.
BTW@Mod the thread icon is still a moon and not a sun.
They basically start playing day 2. Which is bad for town. But so far their actions today gave off a townie vibe. A bad townie vibe, but still a townie vibe.In post 992, MalcolmTucker wrote:Yes but they employ that playstyle as town and scum. What do you think of their actual play so far? This isn't a policy lim for me, it's that Ger has reverted to their suited playstyle when convenient but pushes players when they think it's beneficial for them. Do you basically think Ger should get a free pass to the end of the game?In post 985, KittyTacky wrote:That's what we were trying to convince Ger of D1. They are set on their bad playstyle. But it's a fact they do it as town. And I oppose policy lims on principle.
1. Not really, because as I said everyone ignored Galron to kill Wayward so Galron didn't get any pressure and so didn't make any comments that could tell if they're scum or town.In post 999, NJAC wrote:Okay, but that was like 26 pages ago, is there anything new to add to that case, maybe something specific?In post 988, KittyTacky wrote:I'm sheeping Malcolm who sheeped Crescent.In post 986, NJAC wrote:Can you please summarize your case on Galron?In post 943, KittyTacky wrote:I think whoever steered the wagon away from Galron is scum with Galron.
VOTE: GalronIMO this makes sense, I played with town Galron and he's not this much of a contentless lurker.In post 595, Crescent wrote:The previous post sums up exactly why I'm not against voting Porkens. Barring a full-on town confirmation. players like him almost always get voted off eventually. It's a matter of when, not if.
But here's a fun fact: Galron really has arguably done evenlessthan Porkens has, he just hasn't been as obvious about it. He has given exactly one reason to suspect Drapion (#179), said he's voting him or Malcolm is #384, and given exactly one reason to suspect Malcolm (#472). That's... Really it.
Porkers may be doing next to nothing, but his approach to Wayward, as much as I had to pull teeth to get him to actually elaborate on anything, is more than we've gotten out of Galron. Porkens is failing, but Galron feels like he's totally lurking from commitment.
I feel like we have circled around this train while discussing trains to oppose it, while most people seem to agree everyone voting him is town, while the player the train is on hasn't given us any reason to look away him. I have yet to see anything that resembles true, game-solving thought process, and he's the lowest poster in the entire game, who has done effectively nothing since September 13th.
I think Professor is town too, Galron just hid in the shadows while two townies were being run up.
BTW@Mod the thread icon is still a moon and not a sun.
I'm also a bit curious about why you say you are sheeping Malcolm, instead of sheeping Crescent directly, given that it was her case after all. Did you trust Malcolm more than Cres?
What do you mean it doesn't do much, I answered the question that was asked to me and linked to the case that I sheeped. How is it an empty post?In post 1017, Porkens wrote:It really doesn’t do much, I’m bad at wagon analysis. I think kitty is more likely scum than ger given the soft. Galton I could see scum too.In post 952, MalcolmTucker wrote:Any thoughts this turn? What do you make of my Ger/Kitty read? How does Wayward turning out to be town affect your read on the game?In post 949, Porkens wrote:Okay. Professor, what was your claim yesterday? I can’t find it.
On what planet is sheeping scummy. I didn't have much to add. Indeed there's no analysis because I agreed with someone else's analysis.In post 1023, Porkens wrote:There is no analysis there. “I’m sheeping” “that makes sense here I’ll paraphrase it” “here’s a random statement based on nothing” “oh kid look”