Mini Normal 2280 | Music Hits of 2015-2019 | GAME OVER
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Sometimes I can pick the scum perfectly t the start of the game but then talk myself out of it by the end. Other games I’m dead convinced I know the scum and am just totally wrong sometimes it’s super obvious but I still can’t see it. The worst is when unfortunately I last until end game and hammer wrong. I’m a chronic hammerer but I’m trying to be better. And when I’m scum I almost always get caught.-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Would it not, in fact, be more protown toIn post 76, Porkens wrote:I don’t know if it’s all that great. What if you are town reading scum, don’t you risk spreading that misconception to others? What if scum uses it as a way to plant town seeds on their members?scumhunt?-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In the past, I have had a tendency to hammer when presented the opportunity. Frequently. I'm trying to do better.In post 128, Wayward Son wrote:
Can you explain this a little better? Are you saying that you're almost always the hammer?? Thoughts of N_M floating in my mind.In post 102, Porkens wrote:Sometimes I can pick the scum perfectly t the start of the game but then talk myself out of it by the end. Other games I’m dead convinced I know the scum and am just totally wrong sometimes it’s super obvious but I still can’t see it. The worst is when unfortunately I last until end game and hammer wrong. I’m a chronic hammerer but I’m trying to be better. And when I’m scum I almost always get caught.
In post 128, Wayward Son wrote:
Can you explain this a little better? Are you saying that you're almost always the hammer?? Thoughts of N_M floating in my mind.In post 102, Porkens wrote:Sometimes I can pick the scum perfectly t the start of the game but then talk myself out of it by the end. Other games I’m dead convinced I know the scum and am just totally wrong sometimes it’s super obvious but I still can’t see it. The worst is when unfortunately I last until end game and hammer wrong. I’m a chronic hammerer but I’m trying to be better. And when I’m scum I almost always get caught.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=83299&start=325In post 183, Galron wrote:Porkens do you have scum games that you've won that you can link to?
---
Time to eat dinner. I'll post more later hopefully.-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
“HAY EVERYONE LOOK AT THIS OTHER PERSON PLEASE”In post 334, Wayward Son wrote:Question to everyone, I see Porkens talking about how bad he is and throwing shade at the idea of Town blocs. His only game relevant post is his "gut" vote. Is it only Professor's defense of him that makes him Town?-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Nice, I like you.In post 352, Wayward Son wrote:
QFTIn post 350, Porkens wrote:
“HAY EVERYONE LOOK AT THIS OTHER PERSON PLEASE”In post 334, Wayward Son wrote:Question to everyone, I see Porkens talking about how bad he is and throwing shade at the idea of Town blocs. His only game relevant post is his "gut" vote. Is it only Professor's defense of him that makes him Town?-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Their ISO is my case. Don’t be lazy.In post 417, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 408, Porkens wrote:I really think wayward is scum. Plz ISO and confirm.Shouldn’tyoudo that? It's your read on them after-all.
I have another scumread I’ll keep in my pocket for now.-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 352, Wayward Son wrote:
QFTIn post 350, Porkens wrote:
“HAY EVERYONE LOOK AT THIS OTHER PERSON PLEASE”In post 334, Wayward Son wrote:Question to everyone, I see Porkens talking about how bad he is and throwing shade at the idea of Town blocs. His only game relevant post is his "gut" vote. Is it only Professor's defense of him that makes him Town?In post 400, Wayward Son wrote:I'm not so hot on my "tinfoil theory" anymore. I never mentioned Professor's claim to see if he would push it as an excuse to not vote him. It'd probably be late game before he could prove it.
When I get back on later tonight, I'll revise my vote. I think Shiidaji is Town.In post 409, Wayward Son wrote:Professor, Porkens. OMGUS I guess.
Galron, and maybe Malcolm.
These are my best guesses.In post 410, Wayward Son wrote:
Without quotes, can you summarize your scum read on NJAC? Something quick?In post 406, ProfessorDrapion wrote:NJAC and Wayward.In post 411, Wayward Son wrote:After Galron's ISO. I just don't know what to say or ask.
@ Galron What do you think?-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
What do you think of 489?In post 528, Wayward Son wrote:I think Galron's wagon is all Town.
Mine, ehh.
Malcolm's vote maybe scum.-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Read ger’s first post.In post 696, Crescent wrote:
And I strongly believe the opposite.In post 690, Porkens wrote:I strongly believe ger is town.
If you think he's town, make an actual counterargument.
This is quickly reminding me of 2273 where I am one of the only people actually making an argument.-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
That’s a scummy fucking vote.In post 704, MalcolmTucker wrote:I think Crescent's case on Gera is solid. Their contradictions here do not make sense as town. Moving my vote before going to sleep.
VOTE: Geraintm-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
First of all, “what do people think of these votes” is a sus way of bringing something up. But as for why that vote was scummy it was because it was just pure sheeping without admitting it.In post 916, MalcolmTucker wrote:In post 690, Porkens wrote:I strongly believe ger is town.
What do people think of these posts? On the one hand they feel a bit too obvious for Porkens and Gera to be teammates. Scum would typically be more subtle. But from Porkens' game so far I'm not exactly sure subtlety is something they really do. The second post here feels like an overreaction; why does Porkens, as someone who admitted themselves struggled with reads, have such a strong townread and visceral reaction to a vote on a player who is notoriously difficult to read confidently in D1?In post 712, Porkens wrote:
That’s a scummy fucking vote.In post 704, MalcolmTucker wrote:I think Crescent's case on Gera is solid. Their contradictions here do not make sense as town. Moving my vote before going to sleep.
VOTE: Geraintm-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
I think ger is town based on his soft claim. Kitty I’m unsure on.In post 952, MalcolmTucker wrote:
Any thoughts this turn? What do you make of my Ger/Kitty read? How does Wayward turning out to be town affect your read on the game?In post 949, Porkens wrote:Okay. Professor, what was your claim yesterday? I can’t find it.-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
This is more words than how I said it but no one blinks that it’s the same.In post 964, Shiidaji wrote:Rereading with no scum flips always felt more like homework than fun detective work Had a moment of weakness where I started suspecting Malcolm pretty hard due to his shift in read on Ger and the votepost on Ger where he agrees with Cres's case. But I see where his changed early read on ger happened.-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
This is what i was talking about dead horses. There is just no reason to go one so verbosely about this issue. It clutters thread and is anti townIn post 983, MalcolmTucker wrote:In post 981, geraintm wrote:@malcolm.
i dont want day 1 eliminations. i believe town is best served not killing anyone and starting the game only 1 player down and with whatever night info they have, rather than 2 down.
i think everyone's thoughts on day 1 are pointless.
but you can use the info gained from actual actions - votes - on day 1 during day 2.
i think during day 1 all but the few scum (and in there are townies with extra info) are just waffling out of their arses everytime they say someone is scummy (and yes, i include myself in that). during day 1 you can't do anything with what anyone says, it is just pointless. i sit there and give out naughty points as place holders for when i think someone has done something i dont like and want to make a note that later on they can be used as something to return to - (which is what i should have done with you instead of voting).
but once we have a flip then we can start to piece the game together.
and that is what i am trying to do.
you cannot use the defence of "i didnt really want to eliminate wayward, look i said it!" whilst then actually voting for them.that is an action and i can make reads based off your actions.
you cannot say that you only voted them off because it provides more information, and then vote for me for using the very information you have provided for my reads!
Sorry but you continually ignore what the vast, vast majority of players who play mafia say on this one - D1 eliminations have value because they give us info. Without info we are shooting into the dark D2. With no elimination we'd have nothing because Crescent is a strong player and would have been an unsurprising night-kill no matter what.
Now we know Porkens consistently pushed town from the start. Now we know who voted out a townie - reasonably or otherwise - going forward. We know who actively avoided the wagon, perhaps for their own self-gain.
The majority of mafia for uninformed town involves shooting into the dark. Even now, on D2, our info remains somewhat limited, because if you are town you do not know who is scum, the literal point is to solve, whether it be based on intuition, votes, gut or links between players. Without eliminations and votes it is impossible to do that. Refusing to compromise on wagons or eliminate players is fundamentally anti-town. You have been told this over and over again, by players who are experienced and good at mafia, and you simply refuse to take this info on-board.
If you are town your suspicion of me for the hammer is just fundamentally a complete misreading of the game. I have said, multiple times now, we needed someone to be voted out D1 and nobody has hammered. My concern when going to bed was nobody would be around to do so and we would head into D2 without an elimination. What if Wayward had actually been scum? It would've been a wasted turn. I don't think you are town but if you are - without meaning to sound like a dick here, please engage with the actual realities of the game and how everyone else plays mafia instead of holding theories and reads based on your own obscure approach to the game nobody else actually agrees with or follows.
It is simply impossible to work alongside a townie who refuses to compromise on a wagon because they think they know better, then blames another player for hammering because too many players in the game are just outright refusing to compromise or consider an alternative elimination to whoever they want out.
And again - this is part of my issue with your approach here. You say D1 is useless but pushed me. When it suits you, you are evidently happy to eliminate, but then won't compromise on anyone else. That is just fundamentally anti-town, mafia involves compromise.-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 988, KittyTacky wrote:
I'm sheeping Malcolm who sheeped Crescent.In post 986, NJAC wrote:
Can you please summarize your case on Galron?In post 943, KittyTacky wrote:I think whoever steered the wagon away from Galron is scum with Galron.
VOTE: Galron
IMO this makes sense, I played with town Galron and he's not this much of a contentless lurker.In post 595, Crescent wrote:The previous post sums up exactly why I'm not against voting Porkens. Barring a full-on town confirmation. players like him almost always get voted off eventually. It's a matter of when, not if.
But here's a fun fact: Galron really has arguably done evenlessthan Porkens has, he just hasn't been as obvious about it. He has given exactly one reason to suspect Drapion (#179), said he's voting him or Malcolm is #384, and given exactly one reason to suspect Malcolm (#472). That's... Really it.
Porkers may be doing next to nothing, but his approach to Wayward, as much as I had to pull teeth to get him to actually elaborate on anything, is more than we've gotten out of Galron. Porkens is failing, but Galron feels like he's totally lurking from commitment.
I feel like we have circled around this train while discussing trains to oppose it, while most people seem to agree everyone voting him is town, while the player the train is on hasn't given us any reason to look away him. I have yet to see anything that resembles true, game-solving thought process, and he's the lowest poster in the entire game, who has done effectively nothing since September 13th.
I think Professor is town too, Galron just hid in the shadows while two townies were being run up.
BTW@Mod the thread icon is still a moon and not a sun.
Whoooooowow this is a scummy post. What does it do? What-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
It really doesn’t do much, I’m bad at wagon analysis. I think kitty is more likely scum than ger given the soft. Galton I could see scum too.In post 952, MalcolmTucker wrote:
Any thoughts this turn? What do you make of my Ger/Kitty read? How does Wayward turning out to be town affect your read on the game?In post 949, Porkens wrote:Okay. Professor, what was your claim yesterday? I can’t find it.-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
Because it’s exactly the kind of post scum makes when they want to appear active but don’t want to dó anythingIn post 1015, MalcolmTucker wrote:How is that scummy?-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
The person with the bird avatar. Gut readIn post 1046, NJAC wrote:
Who is Birdy and why do you scum read them?In post 1027, Porkens wrote:No order within groups:
Ger
Salsa
Professor
Njak
Malcomb
Gal
Kitty
Birdy
Ish-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
It’s not the sheeping that’s scummy, it’s the act of posting literally nothing that will jostle the game state. Trying not to make waves.In post 1057, KittyTacky wrote:
On what planet is sheeping scummy. I didn't have much to add. Indeed there's no analysis because I agreed with someone else's analysis.In post 1023, Porkens wrote:There is no analysis there. “I’m sheeping” “that makes sense here I’ll paraphrase it” “here’s a random statement based on nothing” “oh kid look”-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
In post 1057, KittyTacky wrote:
On what planet is sheeping scummy. I didn't have much to add. Indeed there's no analysis because I agreed with someone else's analysis.In post 1023, Porkens wrote:There is no analysis there. “I’m sheeping” “that makes sense here I’ll paraphrase it” “here’s a random statement based on nothing” “oh kid look”Gut it out, keep poking the hornets nest, see what flies out
-
-
Porkens Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: June 20, 2008
You deny you soft claimed in Your first post?In post 1064, geraintm wrote:im curious about this too. what tells do i have.
yesterday's posts about me feel very different, mainly because the people writing them havent done it from the point of view that i am scum. you get very different answers if you come at me from a different point of view.
i have this fear that this might be now setting me up to live because they think i might want to go after malcolm. i was first set up via crescent, and now other things? i dunno, maybe, getting paranoid now
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-