Mini 2282 | Masqué | Postgame

[Masquerader Green]

feeling unwell, will evaluate things later, but wanted to check in and indicate I'm present

[Masquerader Green]

I think based on the first page I find Teal a smidge suspect.

[Masquerader Green]

Purple at the top of this page seems to be very assertively smug, don't really like that from them.

[Masquerader Green]

I've only skimmed but I "like" magenta's and teal's posting. I will have to think about what this means with regards to their alignment.

FYI Magenta, I'm playing a character based on the idea of purple prose and the color purple being associated with moodiness and royalty, if that helps you parse my posts at all.

Hello green, why do you find teal suspect?

I'm not explicitly trying to connect a face to a name but they seem to be imitating two people at once almost and that bothers me, as the first word I would describe it as would be "obfuscating".

[Masquerader Green]

feeling unwell, will evaluate things later, but wanted to check in and indicate I'm present

This person looks like mafia.

How so?

Are there any of your previous incarnation's opinions that you do particularly endorse or disagree with?

I disagree with their reading of Magenta as suspicious simply because of one comment about roleplay. I don't find that suspicious. Although it is a little suspicious that Magenta didn't respond to Red's initial question, which would have been in keeping with their enjoyment of roleplaying. And it was a good point about Teal interacting with the backup mod.

I also like Yellow calling out Green. I don't know about Yellow's acting confused about what Intruder does though. Seems a bit like a move scum would do to give off town vibes.

Interesting. Why do you like Yellow's call out?

[Masquerader Green]

Purple, what makes you read Olive as intruder when the one thing they've done is give a read you agree with?

That's not true; olive has done two things (you overlooked that they revealed to us they had trouble logging into their account) and both things were written with the intent to get others to like them rather than to uncover information about the identity of the intruders or to disclose meaningful information about themselves.

Are you still confused about why you should not trust olive, red?

Are you still confused about why you should not trust olive, red?

Yeah this line looks agenda driven.

looking at this it's rather clear yellow took purple's statement very out of context, and I get why purple is speaking the way they are to them as a result. I still find purple's manner of speaking rather peculiar but I can leave it be, I am accepting of differences.

[Masquerader Green]

VOTE: Masquerader Yellow

This is where my suspicions point me currently. I do not trust the way they took Purple's post out of context.

[Masquerader Green]

Green, why do you believe yellow took my post out of context due to being an intruder rather than a masqué jumping to conclusions?

it's pretty obvious in context that your post is laying out why you think olive is not to be trusted, and that comment yellow took out of context is a directly follow-up saying "do you see why I'm saying this now?"

also, no one is actually voting anyone yet, and I want that to change.

[Masquerader Green]

oh I thought this was just gonna be a regular game, huh

UNVOTE: Masquerader Yellow

[Masquerader Green]

Green, why do you believe yellow took my post out of context due to being an intruder rather than a masqué jumping to conclusions?

it's pretty obvious in context that your post is laying out why you think olive is not to be trusted, and that comment yellow took out of context is a directly follow-up saying "do you see why I'm saying this now?"

also, no one is actually voting anyone yet, and I want that to change.

Ah, I see. Do you think teal or magenta are also trying to mischaracter what I'm writing? They both wrote different variations of "I can't understand purple."

Have you thought about pairs, green?

I don't think they're mischaracterizing but it does look like magenta might be angling to push you for your way of speaking
Yellow was the only one to take a specific line of text and misrepresent it.

[Masquerader Green]

VOTE: Masquerader Yellow

This is where my suspicions point me currently. I do not trust the way they took Purple's post out of context.

oh I thought this was just gonna be a regular game, huh

UNVOTE: Masquerader Yellow

Green doesn't want to appear aligned with yellow

, and yellow is an intruder; therefore I am deducing that the intruders are green and yellow. Olive was my red herring and teal was red's red herring.

Offer hand: Red

Offer hand: Olive

Offer hand: Blue

Offer hand: Teal

Offer hand: Magenta

that's your takeaway? lmao
I still think Yellow is sus as fuck you assclown

[Masquerader Green]

I still think Yellow is sus as fuck you assclown

Manners.

Why is Yellow an Intruder in your view?

did you actually read my posts?

[Masquerader Green]

I don't fully understand how yellow is perceiving that I slipped

If you had received a green PM

it would be unequivocal that invitee is the proper label.

or, try this: Purple read the opening flavor
Intruders were mentioned in there

[Masquerader Green]

I still think Yellow is sus as fuck you assclown

Manners.

Why is Yellow an Intruder in your view?

did you actually read my posts?

Yes, I did. Will you please answer the question?

No, because I already did prior to you asking.

[Masquerader Green]

Unfortunate. I had hoped there was something more.

Why did you ignore Olive's participation in that exchange?

I don't really have a cut-and-dry feel for Olive's actions so I haven't really spoken on them yet

[Masquerader Green]

Currently liking green and cyan, very much dislike magenta. So that means, I still feel good about Red as well. Blue hasn’t done anything to concern me yet.

I did a quick think about pairing options and Cyan doesn't seem that terrible rn
I am not inclined to pair with Yellow, would rather just leave Yellow unpaired entirely

[Masquerader Green]

I don't fully understand how yellow is perceiving that I slipped

If you had received a green PM

it would be unequivocal that invitee is the proper label.

or, try this: Purple read the opening flavor
Intruders were mentioned in there

And invitees were not, so?

it was still mentioned in a context that made it pretty obvious the intruders were the scum faction of this game

[Masquerader Green]

Olive, what are you liking recently from Green? I can see Cyan being more town in the past page.

I concur about cyan. I can see two intruders out of teal, magenta and green. I prefer one be left without a partner and the other two be paired together.

are you for real
you sussed me because you thought I was distancing from Yellow, now you've dropped Yellow from your suspects but I'm still there?
Why has Yellow even left your suspect pool? I think this scumslip angle they're pushing against you is a terrible look for them.

[Masquerader Green]

The usual phrasing would be "Äre you still confused

about why I do not trust olive, red?"

Not why red should not trust them.

Yeah, good point. I could see that as a possible perspective slip.

how could you see it as that
I think in context Purple's comment that Yellow was reacting to made way more sense. The most charitable interpretation of this is you were taking Yellow's comments at face value, which shows lack of effort on your part to determine the quote was not doctored.

Also, @Magenta, what makes my posting on the previous page "terribad"?

[Masquerader Green]

yeah I've been struggling to find a constructive way to express this but cyan just snap-pairing with yellow after I suggested yellow go unpaired feels a tad insulting unless cyan is an intruder
as for pairing with magenta, I might consider it after magenta explains some of their grievance with me.
If I go unpaired I'll be a little upset but I feel like being too salty over it would just further my own personal spiral into eternal bitterness

[Masquerader Green]

The usual phrasing would be "Äre you still confused

about why I do not trust olive, red?"

Not why red should not trust them.

Yeah, good point. I could see that as a possible perspective slip.

how could you see it as that
I think in context Purple's comment that Yellow was reacting to made way more sense. The most charitable interpretation of this is you were taking Yellow's comments at face value, which shows lack of effort on your part to determine the quote was not doctored.

Also, @Magenta, what makes my posting on the previous page "terribad"?

I’m not commenting on posts that I don’t see as currently relevant. If you’d been paying attention, you’d know I no long hold that opinion.

Why did you believe it before?

[Masquerader Green]

like, I recognized you no longer held that stance, but I think it was a bad stance to begin with.

[Masquerader Green]

Offer: Blue

I reviewed my options and this seems like the most pleasant selection out of all of them. Red and Magenta would likely refuse outright and I don't feel the greatest about Teal, though it's a second I would consider. Also, despite the limited content I feel like I got a good vibe from Blue's posting.

[Masquerader Green]

whatever
it's plain as day no one actually likes hearing what I have to say
thanks for validating all my worst paranoia, this sucks but I think playing this game was a good choice in the end

also Red sus as fuck for forcing the pairing with Blue despite disagreeing with their reads so much

[Masquerader Green]

I highly encourage accepting red's invitation to pair.

okay no it was purple

[Masquerader Green]

yeah purple, you can go fuck yourself.