Open 875 - The Kindgom of Zeal: The Queens Chosen - GAME OVER

[Umlaut]

What's vc on furtive? Kind of like that wagon better, this one isn't doing anything.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

No, I'm posting that because I said earlier I'd find links and my CS game ended so I found the links. Sorry if it comes off that way though /gen

that's fair i guess. i didn't realize someone had asked earlier, i haven't read anything in the thread back beyond that ranger post

[Ranger]

You are despicable.

Quickly, need to apologize for this.
I grew up on Looney Tunes. I was channeling Daffy Duck's signature line. However, I realized after how it'd not be clear. In site culture, it'd appear to be attacking the character of the individual. That is unacceptable. Sorry about that. I promise it was unintended. Still, I'll need to do better.

I've reason to be furious. I thought I was careful to not cross a line in my anger, but I missed this detail and how it wasn’t clear. It is my bad. I messed up, and I am sorry.

Will be around later.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

You are despicable.

Quickly, need to apologize for this.
I grew up on Looney Tunes. I was channeling Daffy Duck's signature line. However, I realized after how it'd not be clear. In site culture, it'd appear to be attacking the character of the individual. That is unacceptable. Sorry about that. I promise it was unintended. Still, I'll need to do better.

I've reason to be furious. I thought I was careful to not cross a line in my anger, but I missed this detail and how it wasn’t clear. It is my bad. I messed up, and I am sorry.

Will be around later.

okay well the part where you accuse me of pluralphobia is the bigger issue but yes, daffy duck, go off or something

[Lady Lambdadelta]

and frankly your anger is your own fucking business and i'm not here to tell you what you are and aren't allowed to feel but equating your anger as justified based on something that is unfair, untrue and explicitly pluralphobic and applying that to me and going "well I'm well justified" is fucked up.

[LavosCore]

THE QUEENS DECLARATION - MODERATOR NOTICE

I realise things are a little heated right now, and I'm going to request accusations on personal and system matters remain out of the game.

I have trust and good faith in the players present that they are capable of handling things in a mature and pleasant fashion and I will take action against continued personal attacks.

Please do not defend or attack using Plurality in any form.

If you're feeling the heat, step away, do some self-care, despite the seriousness of my flavour and lore, this is a game.

[Gimli]

Spoiler: assortment of links on plurality for anyone curious

Plurality Discussion Thread, This Speakeasy thread from LLD is also good.

more than one, plurality resource, about plurality. (this link uses multiplicity, which is the old term for plurality), plurality hub

ty for the links korina <3

[LavosCore]

Vote Count 1-5

Ranger

(5)

:

Lady Lambdadelta - Ranger - redFF - Umlaut - Korina

redFF

(1)

:

Detective Penguin

Umlaut

(1)

:

Sail

furtiveglance

(3)

:

Gimli - Cephrir - Save The Dragons

Not Voting

(3)

:

Ethel - Radical Rat - furtiveglance

With 13 players in the game, 7 are required to Yeet unto the Eternal Void .

Day ends in (expired on 2023-03-21 10:00:00)

Mod Notes

Radical Rat is V/LA.

Pronouns are visible under a players name, please use them. If you're unsure, ask!

A quick reminder! One of my rules is this:
BE NICE, BE KIND, LOVE IS GREATER THAN HATE.

[Umlaut]

VOTE: furtiveglance

[Detective Penguin]

oh

[Detective Penguin]

oh my

[Detective Penguin]

what is this?

[Detective Penguin]

competing wagons at equal levels?

[Detective Penguin]

yes...yes...I believe so

VOTE: furtive

[Detective Penguin]

[redFF]

VOTE: furtive

L-1

Choo choo mother truckers !

[Detective Penguin]

UNVOTE:

[Ranger]

Ranger has the same fucking tell, I saw it, I'm applying it, it's not fucking fair that I get lambasted like this.

About that.

I'm town, so clearly whatever the tell is? Doesn't apply to me. I've the right to be furious you're applying a tell from someone else (who I've been

very

insistent in not comparing to me), and the tell is

wrong

because I am not them (meaning my insistence to not be compared to them was

justified

because comparing me to them

resulted in a wrong read

).

I'd love to say more but I cannot. (This much should be okay, at least I hope.)

I realize there's plenty more to talk about.

But you will understand my anger when I flip town. And you

cannot

tell me it's unjustified when I am town, you said I was scum by a tell not even designed for me, and you pushed my mislim through using it.

There are more reasons you have used than just the tell.
Those reasons are disingenuous because they were fueled by the tell. (This is something I could prove easily if I cared to. To demonstrate this statement's not hot air, example: regardless of what I claimed you'd have pushed me. Cop? I want to live through N1. Doc? I don't want to claim a result D2. I didn't claim which role so your take was to call me scum for it. Whichever option I did, you would call it scum, because the tell is the basis of the read, not the content I've given. Don't pretend I'm wrong on that, you

know

whatever I claimed, you'd have called a scumclaim.)

Nothing you say will change I'm town.
Nothing you say will change you've specified you're using a tell for me. (You've repeatedly said you are.)
Nothing you say will change that tell being wrong. (See point #1.)
Nothing you say will change that tell having been developed for someone other than me. (I wasn't playing, ergo, it couldn't be developed for me.)
Nothing you say will change your push having been disingenuous because of your reasons being fueled by the tell. (You're lying if you say your secondary reasons didn't flow from the primary one. Maybe deliberately, maybe to yourself. Regardless of whether you know it's tunnelvisioning or you genuinely have the blindness to not see the confirmation bias, it's still true.)

These are all facts.

They are demonstrable. I'm reasonably certain this statement's within the bounds of rules for both site and game.

I was confused by the wrong read. I understand most wrong reads, and they're usually nothing which bothers me. It's a game.
I've strong reasons to be angry at

this

wrong read.

[Detective Penguin]

Can you please unvote yourself, Ranger?

[Ranger]

(Upside; yes, I'm back to thinking LLD's town.)

[Detective Penguin]

wonderful...unvote yourself pls?

[Ranger]

Can you please unvote yourself, Ranger?

I see no reason to.

Every voter on me will have accountability for it. Especially L-1/hammer.

There's a great deal going on. My vote on myself keeps my wagon strong, meaning extra accountability for positions.

[Umlaut]

Maybe Ranger is just better at scum than I expect but this doesn't read scum to me

[Detective Penguin]

Can you please unvote yourself, Ranger?

I see no reason to.

Every voter on me will have accountability for it. Especially L-1/hammer.

There's a great deal going on. My vote on myself keeps my wagon strong, meaning extra accountability for positions.

I mean - it's completely helpful for VCA + the fact that you are the only viable yeet + the fact that you voting is helpful regardless of whether you flip scum or town +....oh look that that, lots of reasons.

Your vote skews things, it doesn't help things.

[Detective Penguin]

Can you please unvote yourself, Ranger?

I see no reason to.

Every voter on me will have accountability for it. Especially L-1/hammer.

There's a great deal going on. My vote on myself keeps my wagon strong, meaning extra accountability for positions.

the fact that you are the only viable yeet

*are not the only viable yeet