They're not all facts and and you're still scum.In post 392, Ranger wrote:About that.In post 371, Lady Lambdadelta wrote: Ranger has the same fucking tell, I saw it, I'm applying it, it's not fucking fair that I get lambasted like this.
I'm town, so clearly whatever the tell is? Doesn't apply to me. I've the right to be furious you're applying a tell from someone else (who I've beenveryinsistent in not comparing to me), and the tell iswrongbecause I am not them (meaning my insistence to not be compared to them wasjustifiedbecause comparing me to themresulted in a wrong read).
I'd love to say more but I cannot. (This much should be okay, at least I hope.)
I realize there's plenty more to talk about.
But you will understand my anger when I flip town. And youcannottell me it's unjustified when I am town, you said I was scum by a tell not even designed for me, and you pushed my mislim through using it.
There are more reasons you have used than just the tell.
Those reasons are disingenuous because they were fueled by the tell. (This is something I could prove easily if I cared to. To demonstrate this statement's not hot air, example: regardless of what I claimed you'd have pushed me. Cop? I want to live through N1. Doc? I don't want to claim a result D2. I didn't claim which role so your take was to call me scum for it. Whichever option I did, you would call it scum, because the tell is the basis of the read, not the content I've given. Don't pretend I'm wrong on that, youknowwhatever I claimed, you'd have called a scumclaim.)
Nothing you say will change I'm town.
Nothing you say will change you've specified you're using a tell for me. (You've repeatedly said you are.)
Nothing you say will change that tell being wrong. (See point #1.)
Nothing you say will change that tell having been developed for someone other than me. (I wasn't playing, ergo, it couldn't be developed for me.)
Nothing you say will change your push having been disingenuous because of your reasons being fueled by the tell. (You're lying if you say your secondary reasons didn't flow from the primary one. Maybe deliberately, maybe to yourself. Regardless of whether you know it's tunnelvisioning or you genuinely have the blindness to not see the confirmation bias, it's still true.)
These are all facts.
They are demonstrable. I'm reasonably certain this statement's within the bounds of rules for both site and game.
I was confused by the wrong read. I understand most wrong reads, and they're usually nothing which bothers me. It's a game.
I've strong reasons to be angry atthiswrong read.
----
The bolded things are unacceptable and clearly intended to bait me.
Let me tell you something very clearly. Saying that someone is "lying to themselves" is gaslighting. You know what you're doing.