Like in what world does ircher have a solid townread on me AND somehow miss the whole point of putting AD in the cop slot in the first place, given that he was reading recent pages specifically?
why does scum miss that
like to conclude he's scum making that post you have to assume he's either:
1) genuinely checked out, not remembering things and not even talking about the game with his teammates
2) faking being detached at that level
which do you think is happening here?
imo most people who are playing scum wouldn't even think to make a post like 3546 if they're aware of the mechanics and actively strategizing about how to play around them
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
how is eliminating SK today better than eliminating him tomorrow? that's what I don't understand
I don't really see how it's mechanically better to eliminate him today unless he's actually scum, but maybe I'm missing something
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
I've seen you assert it a lot but I don't remember a convincing explanation/case
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 3550, GuiltyLion wrote:
like to conclude he's scum making that post you have to assume he's either:
1) genuinely checked out, not remembering things and not even talking about the game with his teammates
2) faking being detached at that level
Conversely, to be town he has to have a genuine townread on me that he built from reading primarily the portion of the game where I discuss why AD *should* be cop, be genuinely checked out and not remember that specific part of the game. You know, the one part he's shown knowledge of. Whether he's scum who made up a read on me or scum who is pretending not to know what's going on, both of those are less ridiculous than that he's town who posted:
What do you mean by "as a leash"? Is the assumption that whoever gets copped will also get night killed?
and
In post 3546, Ircher wrote:
What prevents scum from killing Dan in the town Skrew case? Then we're just down two townies.
In post 3562, GuiltyLion wrote:
I don't really see how it's mechanically better to eliminate him today unless he's actually scum, but maybe I'm missing something
If the premise is "We're absolutely killing SKrew", then today is better than tomorrow because we will have an additional investigation to add to our reads tomorrow. I'm not in favor of killing Skrew here because his play is null, not really scummy, and a scumflip here puts us in a significantly better position tomorrow. (For one, two scum remaining would give us the potential for using a tracker instead of the cop at night, since tracker results are cop results with only one scum.
In post 3568, SleepyKrew wrote:
Wait yeah all of GL’s recent stuff about furtive indicated a town lean or at least a desire to vote elsewhere today
No it didn't? If you go back and read my big post near day start, if you treat SK/AD as town there's a lot of gamestate/VCA stuff that points to furtive scum, especially if Ircher slot is town.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
I think we're like one/two flips away from these VCs being truly useful but if we treat SK/Dan as town, there's some notable action here. the furtive counterwagon to both xof and dan (at 3 votes each) was LLD/Pooky/SK (presumably three town?) and it dismantled once Pooky followed Bingle onto xof. if furtive is town I'd generally expect at least one mafia to be setting themselves up there to ensure that the limpool is locked in at three townies and put themselves in good standing today with any of them flipping. I can imagine that may have been what Lorne was doing with Dan, but if both furtive and SK are town, nobody else was riding LLD's coattails to give them an easy target on D3?
my other thought here is that if furtive is town then it's likely there's a scum in STD/UNOwen/Bingle cause I feel like the slow inevitable momentum of the xof wagon must have had at least one scum comfortably on there throughout the whole day.
I wanna think a bit more about Pooky's thought that scum!furtive doesn't need to advocate against shooting town!xof, it makes sense to me but if the vig list was all town then maybe that's a play for towncred by WKing a slot
also, if Lorne is scum then sheep egging the xof wagon along while staying parked on Lorne remains a bad look
ircher/sheep/furtive feels like too easy and lazy of a solve but I don't think I'd be willing to bet the game on any of them town and they've all kinda been a bit blocked together with their reads on each other all game, even among the players in these slots prior to Ircher and Sheep. I think Ircher would be my choice for lim today though, I kinda vibe with SK on furtive, if he's scum he's chosen to play it by recklessly openscumming to the point of near trolling and that
could
be mafia but it is pretty audacious and I'm inclined to go for more conventionally scummy players in this pool first
Read my posts please before you talk about what's in them, thanks!
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 3565, Bingle wrote:
Conversely, to be town he has to have a genuine townread on me that he built from reading primarily the portion of the game where I discuss why AD *should* be cop, be genuinely checked out and not remember that specific part of the game. You know, the one part he's shown knowledge of. Whether he's scum who made up a read on me or scum who is pretending not to know what's going on, both of those are less ridiculous than that he's town who posted:
What do you mean by "as a leash"? Is the assumption that whoever gets copped will also get night killed?
and
In post 3546, Ircher wrote:
What prevents scum from killing Dan in the town Skrew case? Then we're just down two townies.
Bingle I'm not really following you here. This seems consistent with town who has barely read the game and is giving you a lazy townread because you seem solvey. I dont see any contradiction in the two posts you quoted, if anything they're the same mindset of someone unaware that there's a doc. Am I missing something?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
lol nothing cheeses me more than when someone makes a statement about *my* posts that isn't true
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
