In post 3203, ActionDan wrote:
I am really confused about the point you're trying to make in the first paragraph in relation to my post, if there is any or if this is just a segue into an esoteric point that if Xof is scum SK probably isn't because he's about as proactive as dry yeast?
nah I think I lost the plot of that conversation at some point and accordingly didn't make my reply clear, what happened was:
GL: "xof scum doesn't make a lot of sense, who are their buddies? if xof is town maybe Dan is scum, Dan seems to not be keying on his prior scumread of SK at all, maybe that's indicative"
Dan: "Why should I be keying on SK, he's on the council we can't lim him"
GL: "I'm not saying you should be pushing to lim SK. [repeats first post in different words]"
what I didn't say that maybe I should have is that just because we can't/shouldn't lim SK today, doesn't mean I expect you to just not engage with him at all, or not call out where he continues to be scummy or whether your read evolves. but it's all not really a useful conversation anyways, at least not at this juncture.
In post 3203, ActionDan wrote:Whether he's tongue in cheek, whether he's dead serious about his position (which he is), he's projecting the same certainty. Do not give people the luxury of having it both ways. The extenuating circumstance around Xof wouldn't detract from his confidence regardless of their flip. If town as you said, he wasn't focusing there. If scum, I haven't been focusing there and my equity as a candidate for elimination remains unchanged or even increases the next day so tell me why you think it would be out of scum's range to project confidence in that situation? Do not confuse my "simple" argument for rejection of all other matters related to the slot. I'm gone over both of Herta's and Gimli's isos and you can say both town things about them and scum things. I think both have been presented by various people so far and I can rehash them if you'd like. I think Lorne's behavior so far is pretty damning and its more than enough to get a good read. Now if there's something you think is redeeming about Lorne go ahead and tell me instead of enumerating these non-existant hypotheticals. please.
this is fair enough for my 11:30 pm brain. I mainly was catching a vibe that you were embellishing the scumminess of Lorne saying he didn't read your ISO, the main thing is that I don't really feel like I often see scum openly say they aren't reading their scumread's posts in the manner that he did, so I bristle a little bit at you acting like this is definitively scum-indicative behavior, cause I don't think it is. but that isn't gonna be enough to amount to "redemption" of Lorne's slot because I'd be hard pressed to find things that are definitively town-indicative behavior there either.
In post 3203, ActionDan wrote:
I could also probably talk about sheep/bloodbot the 1st council paranoia but I don't care to elaborate further than: Bloodbot was pretty town D1, and 1/3 vs 2/rest of eligible non-1st council members is close to a distinction without a difference
I still don't really feel Bloodbot was "pretty" town D1 and frankly re-isoing him again today weakened my previous desire to TR sheep. The main thing I remember thinking was particularly townie from him was that he accused me of "not having fun" this game, that felt like a genuine read/insight and I don't think I've seen scum make a similar push on me before. Also his reads were a bit messy/all over the place in a way that's less likely to be faked.
Regardless I think there was prob scum on the council
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"