?In post 423, Bingle wrote: Hm, so patchwork has decided to open wolf. Good to know.
?
?
?
?
?
V OTECOUNT 1.010 | |
E LIMINATION V OTES | |
P LAYER N AME | C URRENT V OTES |
Keychain (2) | northsidegal, Not_Mafia |
patchwork (0) | None |
KawaiiKame (1) | Keychain |
Not_Mafia (0) | None |
northsidegal (0) | None |
Eiralox (0) | None |
Umlaut (0) | None |
Dunnstral (0) | None |
Bingle (0) | None |
NOT VOTING: | |
C OALITION V OTES | |
P LAYER N AME | C URRENT C OALITION |
Keychain (4) | Keychain, northsidegal, Eiralox, Umlaut |
patchwork (4) | patchwork, northsidegal, Bingle, Eiralox |
KawaiiKame (5) | Eiralox, Dunnstral, Keychain, northsidegal, Umlaut |
Not_Mafia (5) | Not_Mafia, Keychain, patchwork, northsidegal, Eiralox |
northsidegal (2) | northsidegal, Eiralox |
Eiralox (5) | Eiralox, Not_Mafia, Keychain, patchwork, northsidegal |
Umlaut (5) | Umlaut, northsidegal, Keychain, Eiralox, Bingle |
Dunnstral (4) | Dunnstral, northsidegal, Umlaut, Eiralox |
Bingle (0) | None |
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lock in a Coalition and 5 to eliminate. Deadline: (expired on 2023-04-06 14:49:20) | |
Notes: |
The point isn't that you would remember that game, but that I have reason to believe you would totally do something along those lines. And I think you would have no problem admitting that you would totally do something along those lines. Those lines being seeing someone expressing a townread on your buddy poorly and asking for clarification.In post 389, Keychain wrote: While that's an excellent callback to that game proving your memory is better than mine, "what progression" was not asking him to explain the townread, I just didn't see any progression between the two posts so was asking about that.
And your imaginary Keychain is correct Shirley, if Kawaii were my partner struggling with one of their first scum games, I would probably not jump on them so hard from their very first post, read up on how they're acting different than previous games to push them before the people with direct experience with them can chip in, and keep them as my top scumread ever since their appearance unless they asked me to bus them because they were hating the game, that's technically possible. I feel I'd be much more likely to try to make it easier for them to post naturally - I might fail, but I'd give it a shot first.
Fluff to content ratio isn't a good metric for reading me directly. There is a thing it points to, but me fluffing isn't actually scum indicative, even if it's the only thing I'm doing.In post 398, Keychain wrote: I agree he has good posts though I'm not sure they outweigh the fluff that feels more empty to me - people naturally have different posting rates, it's more of a percentage thing, and by percentage I mean how much I feel like it's one or the other because I haven't counted. 226 is certainly one of those good posts. 57 is one of the posts I was thinking of more as generic helpfulness with not much personal opinion though.
Explicitly, yes. I buddied Delta. I've also been buddying nsg. That's not really scum indicative, though.In post 355, Not_Mafia wrote: buddying the newbie vibe
Based on updated reads and this:In post 435, Bingle wrote: NSG/Dunn
NSG/Patchwork
NSG/Kawaii
NSG/Key
Dunn/Umlaut
Dunn/Patchwork
Dunn/Key
Umlaut/Kawaii
Umlaut/Key
Patchwork/Kame
That took place immediately after the site upgrade where PTs were not appearing in egosearchIn post 439, Bingle wrote: A bit about NM:
Admittedly, it has been years since I've played with N_M, but when I did his contribution to the scumthread was nonexistent. He was intensely useless as a scumbuddy and only marginally less so as a town player. His reads were aight, but he had all the charisma of a wet paper bag.
355 is already more of an explanation of reads than I would ever expect from the old NM. The active antagonism towards Delta is also +town points based on my old metric, because old N_M just didn't give a fuck about scumgames.
I don't know if this is still true, but viewtopic.php?t=90377 strongly suggests it is. If no one contradicts this, it means N_M is almost certainly town by meta.
Also worth noting, that link is a scum PT that N_M forgot about for several days, which means that nsg's reason for townreading N_M holds water about as well as the aforementioned wet paper bag.
Hm. Further research shall be conducted immediately.In post 440, Not_Mafia wrote: That took place immediately after the site upgrade where PTs were not appearing in egosearch
the DREAM, the THEATREIn post 435, Bingle wrote: NSG/Key
including me/um as a pair doesn't follow from your comments about our interactions?In post 435, Bingle wrote: Umlaut/Key
Any inclination to engage with why I'm scumreading patch?In post 447, Eiralox wrote:patchwork
You/um doesn't seem likely, but I'm not taking it off the table as a viable possibility at the moment.In post 444, Keychain wrote: including me/um as a pair doesn't follow from your comments about our interactions?
Also 436 self meta is acknowledged but I'm not just talking about mech but also what I think I called "generic helpfulness" - I didn't call it buddying because I view buddying as targeting a specific player but the generic helpfulness is more a way to look like you're ~progressing the game~ particularly to newer players