Open 106 - Impotence Mafia (Game Over!) before 714

[Natirasha]

/confirm

[Natirasha]

Vote: Natirasha

For claiming NK-Immune GF.

[Natirasha]

Actually, I'm making it my thing to claim serial killer in any massclaim situations from now on.

[Natirasha]

---

Natirasha:
I'm giving you 24 hours to convince me not to vote you.

EmpTyger, I understand you hate self voting, me, and jokeclaiming, but are you serious.

I, too, support a mass-vig claim.

[Natirasha]

I, too, support a mass-vig claim.

Why?

Have you known me to ever not support a claim?

[Natirasha]

EmpTyger, you are voting someone for something they haven't done. I've had 4 posts in this game. One, of course, is my self-vote which I do in every game. The second and third are content. This is my fourth. So, can you present to me some of this "anti-town behavior"?

Additionally, I find your "We're under strict deadline" speech to be a false dilemma. We have a month. That's more than enough time to get a lynch in a open game. Heck, I've finished open games in half that time.

unvote, vote: Emptyger

as a matter of principle.

[Natirasha]

I don't see the purpose of massclaiming at all.

I think it just seems to give the mafia a target after, and a 2/3 chance of stopping the vigilante.

If we have 4 claimed vigs, one is scum.
If we have 3 claimed vigs, the roleblocker acts as a doc-cop to the other 9 players.
If we have more than 4 claimed vigs, we essentially win the game because the mafia is retarded.

[Natirasha]

---

Um, I haven’t voted you. So, don’t talk about “something they haven’t done”.

Oh, well...

unvote

then. You can tell I didn't pay attention.

(Post [57] is actually your fifth post)
1) Post [27] is the self voting. I’ve already explained how this is deliberately not helping the town. The fact that you do it in every game is immaterial.
2) Post [32] is “Actually, I'm making it my thing to claim serial killer in any massclaim situations from now on.”
3) Post [43] is asking if I was serious.
Post [43] also supported a mass-vig claim, which might have been considered helpful…
4) …had Post [45] not clarified that you were not basing this on any type of evaluation.

Now, your *sixth* [63] post does indicated that you’ve actually put thought into an aspect of this game which would help the town. Which, for the purposes of my ultimatum, I find satisfactory for now. I won’t hesitate to switch back to you if your play fails.

Ok, then.

[quote="Natirasha]
Maybe, if the players are inclined to. However, I am very sure you’ve also been in games when the players don’t. Games in which the playesr, I don’t know , “get bored”, perhaps?[/quote]Theres a big difference between my play in Open games and Mini Themes. In open games, I am highly more likely to take risks, and post more simply because they are faster and generally take a different thought process that mini themes. And the game you were talking about, I was vanilla. I stop paying attention in games when I'm vanilla. I focus on the more-interesting ones.

That principle being? (I’m going to regret asking this, won’t I.)

I'm not sure myself.

[Natirasha]

Vote Natirasha

since he's already claimed to refuse to be of any help during the plan's activation, if not the entirety of the game.

Where did I ever say this?

[Natirasha]

Why are people only looking at Emp and Nat as mafia? What about Ap and Chen?

Why Appassionata and chenhsi?

Lurkers.

[Natirasha]

Natirasha:
One step forward, 2 steps back. Not paying attention? Lying about your reason for a vote?

You caught me on the not paying attention. I coulda swore you vote me though...

On the lying about my reason, the principle was you were voting me, I suppose.

[Natirasha]

I remember saying that I think Natirasha and EmpTyger are scum independent of each other.

Um...how? You realize there is only one scum faction, right?

Vote: SC

Honestly, your case is riddles with holes, and you seem to defend me while saying I'm scum

while defending EmpTyger and saying he's scum

.

[Natirasha]

Oh hey, I forgot about this game.