@KlickIn post 296, Klick wrote:It's fine, it probably means there's ~2 scum in the inactives, and they'll all be pretty reasonable eliminations in about 48 hours.In post 271, Kcdaspot wrote: screw this im done for the night
13 players in this game and only... 8? of them been active.
More opinions please. good night.
PEDIT: grrrrrrrrrrrrrr
As of writing this, you've been away for over 48 hours.
Can you expand your thoughts on inactives, it's been 4 days since the quote above.
In post 333, Klick wrote:Understandable. I think I disagree in the case of RN specifically, but I can see where that read comes from.In post 331, Kcdaspot wrote: I mean he pushed me to clarify my interaction and make a case on IM.
I don't think scums prod like that.
I have reasoning for having RN under the crossfire at the minute, but I'd quite like to sort it out through asking RN some questions and talking with him, rather than pushing on stuff that feels under-developed.
I don't see this explained in your iso - and now that RN has repped out can you clarify this vote please.
In post 353, Immortal Technique wrote:I feel like the people being active are not scum, and that is the issue.....but I hate pushing lurkers, but it may be as dumb and simple as that.In post 352, KayJayQueue wrote: Who is scum Doug?
I haven't found much scummy posting at all, so I agree with the state of the game up to this point.
D1's are a slog, where lurking is
my
natural state, but lurkers should be pushed, at the very least.In post 358, ITF wrote: VOTE:lucca261
I'll go here for now. I think it's odd lucca had two of their posts devoted to just "Hello". The first one is fine, but the second one makes mesuspiciousbecause it feels likescumtrying too hard to fit in during RVS.
Is the reason for this vote purely from the 2 intros into the game, or is there anything in addition?
In post 391, Relm wrote: Kcdaspot had a pretty wolfy progression on IT where they single them out and then take the first justification to throw their vote there (aka: onto top wagon) without really seeming to try and flesh out their read through interacting in real time. I am very curious what they have to say about that interaction in retrospect.
VOTE: Kcdaspot
I like this vote and it's reasoning. I was unaware of who was topping the vote chart at the time of reading through.
In post 465, lucca261 wrote: There's probably scum in Fire vs. Gera, it seems that they are using each other to skate pressuring more active players on D1 when a false step could result in someone being limmed.
This post looks opportunistic. Noteworthy.
Scum points awarded.
_____________
NM has repped in..
More later.
| Falco Apologist | woo Magi
