In post 1992, geraintm wrote:
In post 1915, lucca261 wrote:
I don't really see Kyouko/Enchant as partnered, so FMPOV there's probably two scum on the wagon, maybe even three. If you are town, HT, and trust Kay hasn't pulled a slick gambit on us, probably there's two scum on [Gera, Firestarter, ITF, IT]. Gera has weird interactions subtly defending ITF (
@591,
@670,
@937), has skated my questions regarding IT's role (
@1668 and
@1574) and spent half of D1 on a 1v1 vs. Firestarter that got us nowhere.
Also created the counterwagon on N_M.
D2 vote
N_M (6): Gera, Firestarter, KayJay, ITF, IT, Hu Tao
IT (3):
Not_Mafia
, Enchant,
Greedy
Not voting (2):
Lucca
, Kyouko
sorry for not posting more today. this is the main post i think aimed at me so will try and reply.
I think it is unfair you have picked on me for launching the not mafia wagon. they were getting many pointed questions from people before i voted for them, and their general awkwardness around their role and their night action justified it. and i have never had the influence to sway a wagon like that, do not give me credit for being able to do so.
you have me defending ITF
In post 937, geraintm wrote:
In post 897, ITF wrote:
Balloons
KayJayQueue
Not_Mafia
geraintm
Klick
Greedy
Firestarter
Relm
Hu Tao
Immortal
Kyouko
lucca
is this in order, you have the red ones as scum?
this is one of the posts you picked out. how that is me defending them i don't know. the others, just feel like natural thoughts to me, you are reaching.
yes, i did D1 get into a discussion with firestarter that didnt go anywehre, but you give me no credit for realsing that and pulling away. but even then, why is it worth a vote?
and i did answer your question about IT being scum. i went into it in 1577. so again, what are you on about?
ehhhhhhhh
First of all, about the ITF readslist on
@937: you definitely knew that the players at the bottom were the scummy ones. He was voting me and his argument about the 'hello²' was pretty well publicized. This reads to me like you were throwing him a bone: "Hey, explain your scumreads in more detail".
The fact you focused more on answering
@937 and waved away the other two examples I put forth is concerning, also.
Your statement about him in your readslist is:
ITF - they are just skimming along. i dont understand what the red text is for - are we meant to know?
But the feeling when we read your posts concerning him is that he's a townread of yours. And it's reciprocal:
@431,
@891. I don't think those are TvT interactions, I'm sorry. Notice how on
@891 ITF thinks you are towny enough that he suspects everyone that was voting you. But 20 minutes after this, on
@897, you're not even in his top three townreads.
----
About the N_M wagon: yeah, Kay was the biggest proponent of the wagon, but you cast the first vote. My argument isn't that you were the major party responsible for the wagon going through, but that it's a pro-IT vote. There was one wagon: IT. When you vote another player, you're at least not giving support to the leading wagon on the thread. So if the majority thinks IT's scum, you're a very likely partner.
I had missed your IT answer, will search for it.
----
Regardless of the alignment, I think you're playing very well. If you're town, at least you made everyone in the thread but me think you're towniest town who has ever towned. If you're scum, the same.
I'm not one for lining up lims, and I would like to vote ITF rather than you, given that ITF is obviously lurking. But your interactions with him are concerning to me, I'm sorry, and if he's scum, you're his likeliest partner.