Completely Regular Normal Game (GAME OVER)

[NicoleAndDime]

I think my hoodmates need to discuss more. The votes essentially up to you two now

I do want to hear your thought processes, especially c-worl.

[NicoleAndDime]

But like, I don't think it makes sense for me to restate the chibi case I made in the hood.

[SmileyDude1]

If I can confidently say it's not trekkie/Nicole then Chibi is always the lim for me

If I can confidently say it's not C-worl/Chibi (which i'm honestly really close to just straight up doing cause I think there's also problems with the world where C-worl's claim comes from scum!them) then Trekkie is always the lim for me.

So the thing is i'm struggling to see why scum!C-worl commits a fruit vendor claim in the hood at the beginning of day 2 like they did. Like claiming pr does make sense given how day 1 went, the hood temperature regarding the purity of the hood would likely be uncertain after the JMO lim and both myself and Nicole felt strongly in each other being town which would leave C-worl as the weak link should things sour in terms of hood relations there. Though if it's a fakeclaim and she's actually something else why claim a pr that requires feedback from the recipient then? You wouldn't be able to provide that feedback, and could potentially get suspected when you can't get fruit to anyone, why not claim something that doesn't require feedback and would be easier to fake. They also mention that they are a 2-shot loyal fruit vendor in the middle of day 2. Why let Nicole off so easily if this was the plan from them instead of leveling suspicion there, they kind of assume a RBer at first which doesn't feel like it happens if they are scum with trekkie's claim on the board at the time.

If they are a Mafia Fruit Vendor, then why claim the additional modifiers, that would just make it harder to fit your role into the setup upon massclaim. Also would say the veracity of the claim is put somewhat in doubt by the fact that no one has gotten fruit, so if they were a mafia fruit vendor and were capable of providing feedback, why not do so to make the claim harder to contest.

Comparatively Trekkie's claim also feels very much why commit to that claim given the time frame, but at least there I can see some sort of throughline for why you'd do that as scum. It allows you to coast into day 2 at a minimum (and oftentimes, including here if trekkie!Scum, into ELO), and the babysitter claim specifically pretty easily explains the lack of death for a claimed pr which would be a problem in most instances.

---

Would appreciate additional perspectives on the above, because right now i'm struggling to see how the fruit vendor claim makes sense from a scum perspective.

@Nicole, i'm essentially at this right now. From your perspective do you think the solve is more likely to be Trekkie/Chibi or C-Worl/Chibi. Because if you think the latter and you're town then you need to talk me out of this, otherwise I think it's always trekkie and would rather do that today and figure out you/chibi tomorrow. A response to the Trekkie/Nicole case I made in718 would also be helpful.

Have to get ready for work, but i'll be back later.

[C-Worl]

For me at this point it’s an either/or between Nicole/Trekkie and Chibi/Smiley, unless Smiley hammers Chibi, in which case it doesn’t matter what I think.

If those are the pairings I’m choosing between I’m I like Chibi/Smiley more to be town, mainly bc I like Smiley!Town more and bc I’m skeptical of Trekkie!Scum the most.

Babysitter seems somewhat unbalanced/swingy in a 9p, and Babysitter, FN, FV, Broken hood just seems like too much power as Smiley or you were pointing out in the hood previously.

Even if we assume scum!RB that’s putting a lot of importance on 1 scum role to balance things out.

Now sloth didn’t have any reviewers so it’s technically possible he didn’t balance this but I’d say it’s highly unlikely he would have approved that.

On top of that, if Trekkie were a town Babysitter, why is he alive AND why wasn’t he RBed instead of me?

From my POV it’s all too much.

VOTE: Trekkie99

It’s up to Smiley.

[SmileyDude1]

The pressure!!

Or yolo IG

VOTE: chibiyali

GG if it’s two of da hoodies

If I can confidently say it's not trekkie/Nicole then Chibi is always the lim for me

If I can confidently say it's not C-worl/Chibi (which i'm honestly really close to just straight up doing cause I think there's also problems with the world where C-worl's claim comes from scum!them) then Trekkie is always the lim for me.

So the thing is i'm struggling to see why scum!C-worl commits a fruit vendor claim in the hood at the beginning of day 2 like they did. Like claiming pr does make sense given how day 1 went, the hood temperature regarding the purity of the hood would likely be uncertain after the JMO lim and both myself and Nicole felt strongly in each other being town which would leave C-worl as the weak link should things sour in terms of hood relations there. Though if it's a fakeclaim and she's actually something else why claim a pr that requires feedback from the recipient then? You wouldn't be able to provide that feedback, and could potentially get suspected when you can't get fruit to anyone, why not claim something that doesn't require feedback and would be easier to fake. They also mention that they are a 2-shot loyal fruit vendor in the middle of day 2. Why let Nicole off so easily if this was the plan from them instead of leveling suspicion there, they kind of assume a RBer at first which doesn't feel like it happens if they are scum with trekkie's claim on the board at the time.

If they are a Mafia Fruit Vendor, then why claim the additional modifiers, that would just make it harder to fit your role into the setup upon massclaim. Also would say the veracity of the claim is put somewhat in doubt by the fact that no one has gotten fruit, so if they were a mafia fruit vendor and were capable of providing feedback, why not do so to make the claim harder to contest.

Comparatively Trekkie's claim also feels very much why commit to that claim given the time frame, but at least there I can see some sort of throughline for why you'd do that as scum. It allows you to coast into day 2 at a minimum (and oftentimes, including here if trekkie!Scum, into ELO), and the babysitter claim specifically pretty easily explains the lack of death for a claimed pr which would be a problem in most instances.

---

Would appreciate additional perspectives on the above, because right now i'm struggling to see how the fruit vendor claim makes sense from a scum perspective.

@Nicole, i'm essentially at this right now. From your perspective do you think the solve is more likely to be Trekkie/Chibi or C-Worl/Chibi. Because if you think the latter and you're town then you need to talk me out of this, otherwise I think it's always trekkie and would rather do that today and figure out you/chibi tomorrow. A response to the Trekkie/Nicole case I made in718 would also be helpful.

Have to get ready for work, but i'll be back later.

Pinging this to trekkie as well, if you're town you need to talk me out of the above or we lose here.

Will be back later to register any counter arguments that were made. Am probs going to just commit my vote when I get back, if no one's going to engage my case though.

Also guess this means i'm conf now, hooray . Anyways see you in around 8 hours from now.

[C-Worl]

At least, I can take solace that I was at least right about Smiley despite being wrong about Black, CCS, and Delta

[Trekkie99]

I explained my claim day 1

Cause someone might figure out my role with the points I already brought forward, and they could be scum, so I'm getting out ahead
Also now I can WIFOM scum and say I

definitely

won't

try to protect scum to get them to shoot themself or their mate
Also if there's a watcher then they should

definitely

not

watch me, so scum should feel free to shoot me
Also yolo

C-Worl's 2-shot fruit vendor is awfully convenient yes, but are we planning on limming in the hood today? No. Are we screwed if it's two of the hoodies? Yes. Why are we discussing scum equity in the hood then when it's between Chibi and I today? Why indeed.
Nicole has been on Chibi all day which could be good or bad
Smile I've been sus of all game and I'm sus off them now. The LAMIST is strong and they don't get a free pass for tomorrow.
Speaking of which, how likely is Smile to play to a 2v1 instead of hammering me here? I feel it’s likely.
I could see scum!C-Worl doing the same, and if it is her she’s doing a much better job. Could jump off my wagon with a "Egh I need to rethink this", while in the meantime leaving the door open for town!Nicole to have a change of heart and hammer.
Scum!Nicole will probably just hammer here in a moment.

[NicoleAndDime]

If I can confidently say it's not trekkie/Nicole then Chibi is always the lim for me

If I can confidently say it's not C-worl/Chibi (which i'm honestly really close to just straight up doing cause I think there's also problems with the world where C-worl's claim comes from scum!them) then Trekkie is always the lim for me.

So the thing is i'm struggling to see why scum!C-worl commits a fruit vendor claim in the hood at the beginning of day 2 like they did. Like claiming pr does make sense given how day 1 went, the hood temperature regarding the purity of the hood would likely be uncertain after the JMO lim and both myself and Nicole felt strongly in each other being town which would leave C-worl as the weak link should things sour in terms of hood relations there. Though if it's a fakeclaim and she's actually something else why claim a pr that requires feedback from the recipient then? You wouldn't be able to provide that feedback, and could potentially get suspected when you can't get fruit to anyone, why not claim something that doesn't require feedback and would be easier to fake. They also mention that they are a 2-shot loyal fruit vendor in the middle of day 2. Why let Nicole off so easily if this was the plan from them instead of leveling suspicion there, they kind of assume a RBer at first which doesn't feel like it happens if they are scum with trekkie's claim on the board at the time.

If they are a Mafia Fruit Vendor, then why claim the additional modifiers, that would just make it harder to fit your role into the setup upon massclaim. Also would say the veracity of the claim is put somewhat in doubt by the fact that no one has gotten fruit, so if they were a mafia fruit vendor and were capable of providing feedback, why not do so to make the claim harder to contest.

Comparatively Trekkie's claim also feels very much why commit to that claim given the time frame, but at least there I can see some sort of throughline for why you'd do that as scum. It allows you to coast into day 2 at a minimum (and oftentimes, including here if trekkie!Scum, into ELO), and the babysitter claim specifically pretty easily explains the lack of death for a claimed pr which would be a problem in most instances.

---

Would appreciate additional perspectives on the above, because right now i'm struggling to see how the fruit vendor claim makes sense from a scum perspective.

@Nicole, i'm essentially at this right now. From your perspective do you think the solve is more likely to be Trekkie/Chibi or C-Worl/Chibi. Because if you think the latter and you're town then you need to talk me out of this, otherwise I think it's always trekkie and would rather do that today and figure out you/chibi tomorrow. A response to the Trekkie/Nicole case I made in718 would also be helpful.

Have to get ready for work, but i'll be back later.

I've gone back and forth myself on it
I think chibi/c-worl makes a lot of sense as a team.

[NicoleAndDime]

But I could be convinced to
VOTE: Trekkie

[NicoleAndDime]

Hey wait a minute

[chibiyali]

Is that a hammer?

[sloththeholy]

COMPLETELY NORMAL VOTECOUNT 3.FINAL

Trekkie99

(3) - chibiyali, C-Worl, NicoleandDime

-HAMMER-

chibiyali

(1) - Trekkie99

NOT VOTING

(1) SmileyDude1

With five alive, it takes three to secure an elimination. Day three ends in (expired on 2025-04-16 22:52:15)

MOD NOTE: that’s a hammer!

[sloththeholy]

Trekkie99 has been eliminated. He was a

TOWN BABYSITTER.

.

AND WITH THAT MAFIA HAVE WON THE GAME! CONGRATS TO THE MAFIA TEAM OF NICOLEANDDIME AND CHIBIYALI!

The game is now open to postgame, all PTs will be released shortly, if you have a PT please PM me with any redactions if you need or just write no redactions in the PT itself (:

[NicoleAndDime]

Ggwp all!

[Trekkie99]

LOL
GG
Well played Nicole!

[sloththeholy]

- MODPT -
- Mafia PT -
- Dead Thread -

[sloththeholy]

So quick notes I wanted to do like a pseudo vig in a 9P, cause vig can’t be in a micro closest I could do was like a babysitter which is also interesting in that it can protect like a doctor, but then some cool interactions I wanted between the fruit vendors and the friendly neighbor with the mafia rolestopper , also gotta have a corrupt hood mwahaha, this game has some interesting potential thanks again EVERYONE for playing I appreciate all of you, and if you’re looking for something new to play I currently have an open looking for some seats in the open games queue (:

[sloththeholy]

ALSO another announcement! If you think any player in this game specifically deserves a scummy please nominate them HERE! (:

[chibiyali]

LOL
GG
Well played Nicole!

Rude!

Others played well too!

[chibiyali]

That said.... I think my adoptive mother is going to disown me.

[chibiyali]

Also, gg to C-Worl for landing both shots on target.

...too bad she err... yeah... thought we may have roleblocked her.

IN HER DEFENSE, Nicole -was- rolestopped N1 sooo. Does that count?

[Trekkie99]

Thanks for modding Sloth!

I saw 732 and thought "RIP Nicole tonight".
But then came 733

Figured I was misclearing one of you two early on, but was too tunneled on my scum reads.

Pretty clever lying about not getting C-Worl's fruit

[Trekkie99]

LOL
GG
Well played Nicole!

Rude!

Others played well too!

Excluding myself absolutely

[chibiyali]

C-Worl was loyal. Neither of us ever got any fruit.

Well,me due to alignment and Nicole due to being rolestopped.

[NicoleAndDime]

C-Worl didn't give us fruit
She is loyal and we are hungry