In post 4320, Hoopla wrote: black should be hanging that one on the wall.
I'm very proud of it. Sloppy game by me overall, as usual. But I will never forget post 8



In post 4320, Hoopla wrote: black should be hanging that one on the wall.





















I was told there would be no mathIn post 4327, implosion wrote: It's a mason tell if you assume that a mason would never throw a mason buddy in the list to throw people off of that. And if we make that assumption we can actually quantify exactly how much it is a mason tell!
There are 10 choose 3 = 120 possible scumteams from mason POV, and 12 choose 3 = 220 from a VT's POV. So a mason is just shy of twice as likely to randomly guess the scumteam under this assumption. Which by Bayes' theorem means, if M is the probability that that player is a mason and X is the probability that they would correctly guess the scumteam,
P(M | X) / P(M) = P(X | M) / (P(X | M) * P(M) + P(X | -M) * P(-M))
Say for simplicity that scum know a priori there are 3 masons, so P(M) = 0.25. Then this becomes
(1 / 120) / ((1 / 120) * 0.25 + (1 / 220) * 0.75)
which is very close to 1.5.
The expression P(M | X) / P(M) represents the ratio between the likelihood someone is a mason after calling the scumteam (under the assumption that masons never WIFOM), divided by the baseline probability of them being a mason. In other words, if someone calls the scumteam, that makes them roughly 1.5 times likelier to be a mason under these assumptions.






In post 4331, Hu Tao wrote: Also I was overly annoying this game. Sorry everyone. Ill do better with that going forward
it wasnt and ye you should, Black deserves that


