Medieval Mafia - Game Over

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:33 am

Xylthixlm wrote:Why do you need more?

I enjoy your posts. I feel short changed right now.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:33 am

Xylthixlm wrote:Better at what?

Better at increasing town's chances of winning in the long run? Better as in, really really fun? Something like that.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:38 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Jebus is being wagoned strictly for lurking?
If you look at my post you'll find that I made a case against Jebus earlier on.

You did. But others, mainly Xyl, are only voting him for lurking.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:45 am

"Only voting him for lurking." That makes it sound bad. Hey, let's see if I can apply that to some other situations.

"Some people are only voting him for vote-hopping."

"Some people are only voting him for lying."

"Some people are only voting him for claiming scum."

That actually works pretty well. I'll have to remember it for future use.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:46 am

Kmd4390 wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Jebus is being wagoned strictly for lurking?
If you look at my post you'll find that I made a case against Jebus earlier on.
You did. But others, mainly Xyl, are only voting him for lurking.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:49 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:Jebus is being wagoned strictly for lurking?
If you look at my post you'll find that I made a case against Jebus earlier on.
You did. But others, mainly Xyl, are only voting him for lurking.
You say that like it's a bad thing.

Well if that's true, the same case could apply to a few other people. Why not mention Counselwolf, stark, qwints, sam, farside, or crywolf?

scotmany12 · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:54 am

As it should be evident from my previous posts, I do not condone the wagon on Jebus.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:13 am

scotmany12 wrote:As it should be evident from my previous posts, I do not condone the wagon on Jebus.

Is Jebus worthy of such a supportive statement?

scotmany12 · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:36 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:As it should be evident from my previous posts, I do not condone the wagon on Jebus.
Is Jebus worthy of such a supportive statement?

Well I don't think he is worthy of being lynched if that is what you are asking.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:44 am

Jebus is active in other games. Why is he trying to avoid attention in this one?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:06 am

Xylthixlm wrote:Jebus is active in other games. Why is he trying to avoid attention in this one?

To continue being unworthy of being lynched if that's what you're asking.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:09 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:Jebus is active in other games. Why is he trying to avoid attention in this one?
To continue being worthy of being lynched if that's what you're asking.

Fixed.

scotmany12 · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:44 am

So you think his activity in other games, where you don't know his role, makes him scum in this game? Cause you know, he could quite possibly be scum in those games and town in this one.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:47 am

scotmany12 wrote:So you think his activity in other games, where you don't know his role, makes him scum in this game? Cause you know, he could quite possibly be scum in those games and town in this one.

True that, but then if we don't pressure him to post, and he continues to massively lurk, we'll never have a sign either way, will we?

Xylthixlm · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:48 am

When we lynch Jebus and he comes up scum, scotmany is next.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:49 am

Also, why don't I have a bunch of people blindly following me? No IRC players in this game?

scotmany12 · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:54 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:So you think his activity in other games, where you don't know his role, makes him scum in this game? Cause you know, he could quite possibly be scum in those games and town in this one.
True that, but then if we don't pressure him to post, and he continues to massively lurk, we'll never have a sign either way, will we?

True, but Jebus did say that he would be done reading the first 8 pages by monday (today).

Jebus wrote:Sorry, been busy with stuff and overwhelmed by the D1 burst of activity.

Will be done reading first eight pages which seemed to have appeared overnight by Monday (yay holiday).

See. I don't understand why you people are rushing to lynch him. Give him some time before you automatically condemn him.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:57 am

Four votes is "rushing to lynch"?

scotmany12 · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:58 am

Xylthixlm wrote:Four votes is "rushing to lynch"?

Well its five votes, and he went from two to five in like a matter of, what, a few hours? So yes.

ISO · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:06 pm

XYL, If you just jump in a game with 15 pages, I really expect more from you in the way of analysis than just posting Vote: Player with lowest post count, and talking about day one theory. How about comments on some players? It's very convenient. It's especially unsatisfying because you were tied for lowest posts at that time, so you could have just as easily voted for yourself. That makes your method highly suspect if you're town.

FoS: Xyl

Hasdgfas has rolefished like 4-5 times this game (obviously exaggeration) but I would say def. 2.

DGB definitely seemed to me like a scum player who knew that the player acting scummy left or right was not going to come up scum, information that a huge portion of the town was not able to see. I'm not sure this makes her scum, but it surely does seem suspicious, considering there seemed to be very few reasons NOT to be voting Zwet, let alone actively defending him.,,

FoS: DGB

I forget what farside did that earned my ire. I'm going to go back and re-resd and see if it was anything bigger than XYLs entrance. If it isn't, expect me to be voting him. If it is, expect some pressure and votes on her.

ISO · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:07 pm

Meant:

FoS: Hasdagfas and Farside

As well, sorry.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:07 pm

scotmany12 wrote:We fucking serious people? Seriously, stop unvoting. I do not get what makes this claim so believable; and after reading about William Wallace, I really don't see how martyr (or bodyguard for that matter) fits for him. And we should not be letting him get away with his OMGUS on shea.

Looks like you didn't mind rushing people to lynch earlier on.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:10 pm

Thestatusquo wrote:Meant:
FoS: Hasdagfas and Farside
As well, sorry.

Why are you picking on farside? She's VLA, I believe she's coming back today or tomorrow. I wonder if she's enjoying seeing the grooves on those big Greyhound tires from beneath.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:13 pm

Thestatusquo wrote:DGB definitely seemed to me like a scum player who knew that the player acting scummy left or right was not going to come up scum, information that a huge portion of the town was not able to see. I'm not sure this makes her scum, but it surely does seem suspicious, considering there seemed to be very few reasons NOT to be voting Zwet, let alone actively defending him.

PopTartajo, who has had a game with him too, did the same, though perhaps not as far in the forefront as me. Did that escape your selective attention?

scotmany12 · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:16 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:We fucking serious people? Seriously, stop unvoting. I do not get what makes this claim so believable; and after reading about William Wallace, I really don't see how martyr (or bodyguard for that matter) fits for him. And we should not be letting him get away with his OMGUS on shea.
Looks like you didn't mind rushing people to lynch earlier on.

The difference is zwet was scummy while Jebus has done nothing scummy.