Medieval Mafia - Game Over

Xylthixlm · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:55 am

scotmany12 wrote:
Jebus wrote:Update on my inactivity - If I don't catch up this weekend, when I've got at least 20 hours of nothingness, I probably won't be able to catch up at all.

Sorry for not keeping up
Guys...If Jebus does not catch up over the weekend, hes going to get replaced. Lynching him is an awful move.

If he's replaced, then his replacement will be under pressure. It won't exactly hurt.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:02 pm

scotmany12 wrote:I understand that you actually think he might be scum, but I'm not going to vote someone for lurking. If he does not get caught up, he will be replaced, it is as simple as that. There is no reason to force him to claim.

I like to hunt scum by looking for positive signs, and by process of elimination of those players that appear townie. I've seen positive signs in TSQ, I've eliminated a whole bunch more players from being scum, and that leaves me with a few lurkers, one of which showed some scum signs.

Someone has to be forced to claim. I'd like it to be him rather than some of the players I feel are townies.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:06 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:I like to hunt scum by looking for positive signs, and by process of elimination of those players that appear townie.

Same.

populartajo · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:06 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:I like to hunt scum by looking for positive signs, and by process of elimination of those players that appear townie.
Same.

populartajo · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:08 pm

Therefore the cow should be pressed to claim as soon as he comes back from his V/LA.
Farside also needs more pressure.
I dont see the case on korejora. Obv I still think qwints is at least neutral. Caboose is town. Jebus is meh.

camn · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:09 pm

scotmany12 wrote: Guys...If Jebus does not catch up over the weekend, hes going to get replaced. Lynching him is an awful move.

In reality, if he does not post over the weekend.. OGML's sig will simply change from :

Medieval Mafia is now underway, and currently needs
1
replacement.

to

Medieval Mafia is now underway, and currently needs
2
replacements.

After that some insane person might be willing to replace in on a 40-page day 1.... but whoever they are, they are, by definition, emotionally unstable. And we will have no D1 read on them at all. They will have the obvious advantage of

40 pages

worth of us, while we have nothing on them.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:10 pm

I'm willing to replace in on 40-page day 1's, but that's because I don't read them.

camn · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:21 pm

Are you denying that you are emotionally unstable?

Xylthixlm · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:23 pm

camn wrote:Are you denying that you are emotionally unstable?

No comment.

Caboose · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:24 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:
Jebus wrote:Update on my inactivity - If I don't catch up this weekend, when I've got at least 20 hours of nothingness, I probably won't be able to catch up at all.
Sorry for not keeping up
Guys...If Jebus does not catch up over the weekend, hes going to get replaced. Lynching him is an awful move.
We're doing him a favor. We'll ask for a prod when he's at minus 2, he'll claim/fakeclaim and we'll hammer if we're on to him. That's the plan so far. Can you help us get there?

Yeah, but I would like to know the vote count (wouldn't want any accidental hammers).

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:12 pm

Vote Count:

9 to lynch

qwints: 5 (Kmd4390, Thestatusquo, farside22, Yosarian2, crywofl20084)
hasdgfas: 4 (scotmany12, populartajo, sam.samhorn, qwints)
Jebus: 3 (Xylthixlm, DrippingGoofball, camn)
camn: 1 (Jebus)
Kmd4390: 1 (hasdgfas)
stark: 1 (Caboose)

Not Voting: 2 (stark, Korejora)

Sorry about the lack of frequent votecounts everybody, I'll be back to full access on Thursday.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:14 pm

Rogueben replaces Thestatusquo. Thanks Rogueben!

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:38 am

What??????

Only three votes on Jebus?????

farside22 · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:09 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:What??????

Only three votes on Jebus?????

unvote:
vote: Jebus

Caboose · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:10 am

stark still needs to post.

Unvote

Vote: Jebus

sam.samhorn · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:00 am

Lynching Jebus is the stupidest thing. Scotmany is right.

Caboose · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:02 am

Who said anything about lynching? My vote goes off of him when he posts something useful.

sam.samhorn · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:06 am

Caboose wrote:Who said anything about lynching? My vote goes off of him when he posts something useful.

He's most likely going to get replaced. I'm willing to bet my accountthat Jebus just didn't care about this game and made no conscious effort to actively lurk. Which makes the current case on him absurd.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:09 am

sam.samhorn wrote:He's most likely going to get replaced. I'm willing to bet my accountthat Jebus just didn't care about this game and made no conscious effort to actively lurk. Which makes the current case on him absurd.

How can you tell the difference between someone that is actively lurking, and someone that is not making a conscious effort to actively lurk?

I'm pretty sure that being at L-2 is going to end the lurking. Shall we test the theory?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:48 am

I agree with Scot and Sam. Voting Jebus is a waste of time.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:15 am

Kmd4390 wrote:I agree with Scot and Sam. Voting Jebus is a waste of time.

That's rich coming from you, since you're voting qwints.

Just sayin'

Kmd4390 · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:59 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:I agree with Scot and Sam. Voting Jebus is a waste of time.
That's rich coming from you, since you're voting qwints.

Just sayin'

I actually brought points against Qwints. Of the Jebus voters, you are the only one who seems to genuinely think he is scum.

Just sayin'

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:17 am

stark, hasdgfas prodded.

Seeking a replacement for Jebus.

qwints · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:19 am

Huh, how scummy would it be if I hopped on the Jebus wagon?
I'm not going to, however.

I agree that my play is fairly easy to distinguish from Jebus's. I'm kind of confused why DGB seems to be defending me. Scum know who is town and I wonder if his posturing is trying to establish a way to say "I told you so."

scotmany12 · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:06 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Kmd4390 wrote:I agree with Scot and Sam. Voting Jebus is a waste of time.
That's rich coming from you, since you're voting qwints.

Just sayin'

I cannot fathom how you are unable to see the difference between Jebus and Qwints. Jebus is going to be replaced, while Qwints is here and has done absolutely nothing.