I'm not so sure I agree with that conclusion.J-scope wrote:I’m not very gung-ho about a ZMD lynch. He brought up a valid point against RW when it already looked like RW was going to be lynched, which tells me ZMD was trying to make the best choice and not just save his skin in that instance.
Zmd had voted RW already earlier, because
And they hadn't really voiced arguments against RW except that voting analysis where everyone in a lynching wagon except 2 first and hammer get scumpoints.Zmd wrote: Vote Raging Wishbone. It's me or them. That suits me fine because they are my top suspect anyway.
The point they brought up was very valid imo. But I would expect them to remember RW's invalid Frog attack quite vividly since they got a decent amount of flak for mirroring it without checking the context, and I don't see how using that as further justification for their vote would make them seem less self-preserving.
Kmd, when did Zazie get in the game? I had thought it was only you because of the meta defence and perspective of the posts.
We originally found the interaction between Zaphod and Trotsky extremely strange, scummy and didn't consider Zaphod's fuming extended meta argument as valid for hydras. Thing is, Trotsky flipping SK and Zaphod being right kind of forced us to acknowledge there might have been a clearer bigger picture than we thought/knew of. At the very least the argument was bloody eccentric.
After just rereading nyballs in iso, I'd like to see some arguments why they are being deemed a top suspect.
The posting has been sparse even in the standards of this game and there was a strange FoS on Yosariwen because of walls of text. But other than that I didn't really see fishy content and the thought processes seemed plausible.
J-scope and ortohoops are rereads to finish for tomorrow, getting too sleepy and slow.