But that wouldn't be nice to RC, or be much fun at all, really. Just an interesting thought.
Well, now or never.
Flailing under barely any pressure? Or maybe a few votes is a lot of pressure in this vote-conservative game... Crumble scum!popsofctown wrote:Your avatar creeps me out. Not liking Gears is your loss...The1fifi wrote: Why do I have the only avatar in this thread that's not hard to look at?
Also, Illidan is win.
Really,i am just astonished. after slapping my self, i still can't understand how is this possible!! A freaking noob mistake, and just because nothing else happened i am scum instantly!? really.. i don't know what the hell to say, because you makes as much sense as a redberry pie in top of a three singing 3 blind rats
I would like to know if anyone picked up on it as well...because it is brilliant! As long as it is the first or second 'half lynch' we could definitely get them to use 10 votes and still have plenty to lynch and have night actions. If a NK still goes through, we could see who barely voted D1 because they saw we are going to use this strategy (Depending on how many bonus points you can get, -10 may not be enough to cripple scum)popsofctown wrote: I don't know if anyone has picked up on this, but we can halflynch someone giving them an ultimatum that they squander X CP in a vote/unvote cycle, or get lynched. If it's scum, which hopefully it is that's what you'd aim this sort of thing at, they lose nightkills/actions. If it's town, it could hurt a bit, but we'd probably still get the lynch and most of our actions.
This would be an option if there are two people in the town acting really scummy. We halflynch one, then half lynch the other.
I'm not seeing it. Given fifiScum, NONE of the scum would want him to burn their points.Iecerint wrote:Given fifiScum, it would also potentially give us an idea about how many scum are on the wagon.
AlmasterGM wrote:Unless we bank that fifi is the scum commander, which is a pretty big gamble on our part, we are unlikely to stop any scum night actions. That is probably why this rule exists in the first place - to stop us from breaking the game via this method.Game Rules wrote:In addition, each Commander unit is assigned an additional amount of bonus command points.
More fifi votes, please. They fuel me.
Guilty. I just remembered Almaster saying this more:popsofctown wrote:Are you skimming fate? I bolded, italicized, and underlined the word "a" earlier.
I did an iso of him. And he is being really inflexible about any sort of plan that incorporates the set-up. Why did you sign up if you just want to play a vanilla game of mafia Al?AlGM wrote:t still only works if the cost of NK'ing is moderately high CP-wise
Um. What? Was this necessary? Why would you half-claim when under no pressure at all?Anyway, this is kinda new for me, I was used to the usual kind of game but I'm adjusting. Well... if you noticed that I'm not around in some discussions, just take it as a hint to what my role is.
Just wanted to highlight this post so it doesn't get lost in the madness. What a great addition to town we have here... No content, just a vote on the wagon leader.McGriddle wrote:lol agreed. Sorry I am not posting much, I don't have much to say lol.Iecerint wrote:What the hell could possibly be your justification for asking such an absurd question?AlmasterGM wrote:Seacore, are you a protown power role?
*** you should've said this earlier! I rather would've taken the shot than Seacore...AlmasterGM wrote:@Fate - How do you know my Seacore shot is bad? You are next in line to be shot.
Because I know McGriddle is useless. Useless players should be lynched by town regardless of alignment, just because scum would want to leave them alive until endgame.Iecerint wrote:Useless is just as hard to get a read on as the inactives. Why do you prefer the players you listed to the useless one?
Oh ****. I missed the scumclaim. Thought he was just frustrated at the game mechanics and wanted to self-hammer...The1fifi wrote:Sorry almaster and cruciare
That's cool. Why didn't you SHOOT one of them?If I get my way, we will be lynching the lurkers and jokers.
With bv130 and all the other rebels...Cobalt wrote:Wow, McGriddle is scum.
False negatives would be great, because scum's NK would fail. That would be pretty freakin sweet.Elscouta wrote: I'm a lot more afraid of false negatives (confirming one of their members by draining CPs) that would occur when you "investigate" a scum. (And i will remind you that all it takes for scum to win is one confirmed town member)
Ffs, forgot to unvote.. meh, too many mistakes and bad game for me.
Can't believe I have to actually explain myself on this one, but sure, if he's town he's anti-town enough for a D1 lynch anyway.Sorry almaster and cruciare
I agree with Bv on this one. Though in pops defense, it is the players job to find the most optimum way to win and "break" the setup.Proper my ass. You're complaining that this setup is broken, but it's because YOU broke it.
He modded both Pick your Powers, a little slow on the votecounts but otherwise a competent mod.It looks like Spyrex did. I've never seen him mod.
Like I said, don't blame RC. Could he have forseen:Redcoyote, this might be the worst game I've ever played.
Who reviewed the setup?
Why does Elscouta's flip tell us about Almaster again?popsofctown wrote:I don't, particularly, considering elscouta has claimed scum I want to see what Almaster's alignment is.
Maybe it hasn't been broken yet. OH HOHO HObv310 wrote:Also, most mods I know would have abandoned the game as soon as it was broken this widely. I'm rather impressed at RC's patience.