Woah. Talk about the biggest load of WIFOM right out of the gate.Parama wrote:Anyone who understands how I play knows my alignment.
xvart.
Why would you lead your case on gut, then follow with shallow logic? Wouldn't you want to lead with your most credible evidence (i.e. shallow posts) and then follow up with the less substantiated personal feelings of his posts?Parama wrote:I have yet to read a post by VP that I like. I just get a terrible gut feel from every one of his posts, and the logic is shallow, almost like he's not trying.
And why is that? The rapid backpedaling? The meta vs no-meta arguments?Ellibereth wrote:And Para is probably Town too.
Wait... what? Did I miss something? You have a QT? When did town aligned peeps get QTs??Ellibereth wrote:DGB from one the QT of ours ->^^^About reading Para.I have to agree... another SlySly... watch out if he seems townie!
I think he's town.
I don't see a town aligned person getting a role pm that gives an indication of town population makeup.Parama wrote:A guess based on my role PM.
Jack's post makes me a little uneasy. That is a pretty far fetching conclusion.Jack wrote:Are you asking if I have a post restriction?UncertainKitten wrote: @Jack: Why would youwaste a postpointing out something as obvious as that? Further, you don't even answer why you assumed other was cult...
How is it a terrible post with regards to DGB and Ellibeth? Especially since you are awaiting a response. You must find something in there intriguing or noteworthy. Care to clarify your stance?UncertainKitten wrote:@xvart: Nice. There are so many reasons that's a terrible post, at least regarding DGB and Ellibereth. Are you even TRYING to find scum? I shall await their response to the accusation though.
Seriously? I thought it was a pretty obvious conclusion so I left the statement open ended with a question mark to be corrected as necessary.Parama wrote:Are you asking him? Can't you be sure in your own reasoning?xvart wrote:That he was fishing for possible post restrictions?Jack wrote:What was the conclusion?
xvart.
Or you wish you had any town aligned role right now?Parama wrote:God I wish I was a dayvig
How is it a terrible post with regards to DGB and Ellibeth? Especially since you are awaiting a response. You must find something in there intriguing or noteworthy. Care to clarify your stance?UncertainKitten wrote:@xvart: Nice. There are so many reasons that's a terrible post, at least regarding DGB and Ellibereth. Are you even TRYING to find scum? I shall await their response to the accusation though.
Seriously? I thought it was a pretty obvious conclusion so I left the statement open ended with a question mark to be corrected as necessary.Parama wrote:Are you asking him? Can't you be sure in your own reasoning?xvart wrote:That he was fishing for possible post restrictions?Jack wrote:What was the conclusion?
xvart.
Or you wish you had any town aligned role right now?Parama wrote:God I wish I was a dayvig
So who would openly claim QT on day one? And why hasn't there been any response yet? That is suspicious.Ojanen wrote:This reads like fake indignation. Even the biggest VIs just aren't completely self-unaware andquotetheir mafia qts accidentally. A question is understandable but the FoSses based on this seem off.
I chose town because I wouldn't want to get stuck with lyncher/jester role as other and I prefer the problem solving aspect of town as opposed to manipulation aspect of scum.Ojanen wrote:Why did you choose town, xvart?
If you weren't serious then why did you say you had role info to indicate otherwise?Parama wrote:Yeah it was totally not serious in case you missed it.
Though I would raise the "Other" count to 5 in retrospect.
It helps to know for sure who all the townies are, doesn't it?Parama wrote:In fact, it does! I just don't feel like being on wagons that are obviously wagons on townies.imaginality wrote:Does that apply near deadline too?
While I agree with your conclusion of roles being random (within each grouping), I don't think your reasoning is valid.charter wrote:The role you get is random, I know since I asked Spyrex to be a paranoid day cop no less than three times. I didn't get it.
I'm not asking you to clarify your feelings on the situation. I'm asking why you seem to think it is so terrible (as in not scum hunting) yet so interested in the response.UncertainKitten wrote:@xvart: Ahahahahahaha, nice try. I want them to respond first.
I'm not trying to call him scum based on that, at all. I've already called him scum. His post reads like his defense is all gut, with an afterthought to the shallow logic. That is not even close the defining scum characteristic.LlamaFluff wrote:Tries to call parama scummy for building a case that had sub-optimal ordering of points
You don't find it suspicious at all that someone would claim a QT in the first day? Does it come from a past game? I don't know. I find it difficult to believe that a mason would claim a QT and a mason partner in the first five pages for the exact same reason I find it hard to believe that anyone would claim a QT in the first five pages: it negates the whole purpose of having a QT. That is suspicious. They may not be mafia but I highly doubt at this point that they share the town win condition.LlamaFluff wrote:Even ignoring heavy neighbor/mason fishing, this is amazingly ignorant. It first off ignores the fact that an Eli-scum would claim to have a QT, then passes up the simplest solution that it comes from a past game.
As much as it appears to me that you are trying to undermine my priorities and voting behavior I believe I have been pretty clear. Parama is scum (hence the vote) and Elli and DGB is suspicious (hence the Finger ofLlamaFluff wrote:Apparently is still convinced that Eli-DGB are scum yet is not voting them, wants paramarama lynched for some reason. Probably because he is looking like an easy mislynch that is starting to gain "is town" opposition, scary for scum.
And speculation in any other game is completely different from speculation in this game, where people got to select what faction they wanted to be on. Anyone who says there are 6 scum in the game and 4 other sided (in a game where people picked their side), then says it is a "guess" based on role PM clearly has at least a little more information than an uninformed minority.LlamaFluff wrote:Guess =/= role information, guess based on wording =/= role information, anything with the word "guess" =/= word information. Thats called speculation.If you weren't serious then why did you say you had role info to indicate otherwise?Parama wrote:Yeah it was totally not serious in case you missed it.
Though I would raise the "Other" count to 5 in retrospect.
Am I totally blind or what? Where was this said??Gammagooey wrote:I think xvart has some damn good points against him with his attack on Parama that points out the order of his reasoning of all things and his obsession with a quicktopic that isn't even in this game.
Thank you very much.Gammagooey wrote:Xvart- Llama's iso 7.
I agree about going in circles, especially now that I've been proven incorrect in my suspicion. The last thing I will say is that in most every case, mentioning a QTOjanen wrote:xvart, to cut pointless going in circles in thread, Parama actually said one post after your original FoS on DGB/Elli that the qt mention was from their mafia 109 hydra.
You seem to have genuinely missed that but I just can't see that original suspicion as anywhere close to sincere.
I couldn't agree more.Nicodemus wrote:Guessing isn't scummy when it's just guessing, but when someone asks you how many scum are in the game and you come back with a very confident, exact number, itissuspicious. No townie role, at least in my experience, could possibly give you any clue as to the exact number of scum in a game. If it was a guess, fine, but the way Parama presented the number it sure didn't sound like a guess.
I do not believe that. Why present an exact figure and then come back with role pm as support as a joke? What was the point of the joke? Anyways, care provide an example of similar jokes?Nicodemus wrote:I am however, willing to accept that Parama was joking...
Do you think that town is more likely to get a role like this?UncertainKitten wrote:@Nico: Funny, I could think of several townie roles that could give you exact numbers, and given the format of this game, I get the impression that at least one would exist.
So basically you agree with the masses?charter wrote:Fishy and Balter on a scumteam.
Xvart is scum.
Jack is scum.
Parama is town.
Zorblag is probably scum.
I'm keeping my vote on Balter for the time being. I think Balter and Xvart have the same number of votes.
As am I. I suppose I can see how others may not think he obvscum, but I cannot imagine where all these obvtown reads are coming from. I'll be looking at these people more later...Gammagooey wrote:Farside- I'm actually not as interested in Parama right now as I am in the people who have said that he's town...
I read his post that his case was based on how his gut feeling on every post was off, then an afterthought of shallow logic. That's how it reads to me. When I build a case I start with the concrete and then would follow with "oh, and every post he makes I do not like."LlamaFluff wrote:So then he was scummy for the ordering, sound like if it was the other way around it would have been a null factor.
Yes, I was; although it was not because I was ignoring it.LlamaFluff wrote:You are ignoring the simplest answer still. It was a QT from a past game hydra. Are you honestly trying to argue that Eli tried to prove a point by quoting the scum QT in such a way that it could not have been accidental? They arent masons, they arent scum, they ARE both town. Let it go, you are wrong.
I've I've said countless times, I found it suspicious...LlamaFluff wrote:So its not a slip then? If you think they slipped, I would belive that you would be voting that over a read. Your choice of suspicions make no sense, apart from just trying to get the easier lynch through.
And how definite was your speculation?LlamaFluff wrote:Please... read between the lines. I looked at my role and immediately speculated on how many town players there are, and likely how many scum/other exist. How could speculating in this setup possibly be a tell?
Good to know. Thanks for answering for him.LlamaFluff wrote:This is actually somewhat along the lines of charter-town play.
Why did you use Mafia 89? Since your prefer mafia, but wanted to be random, why didn't you just randomly pick from 1, 2, or 3? Did you really think that your random setup would yield a stronger defense as opposed to the WIFOM you mention?popsofctown wrote:I figured some would be able to figure out my preference by meta. Since it didn't seem useful for me to WIFOM this (you thought I'd pick scum but I PICKED TOWN so now you are going to lynch me when... oh... crap....) I elected to go for the dice instead.
I used Mafia 89 Revenge. Generated a random number from 1 to 22. 1 to 3 were mafia, 4 was other, all other numbers were town. I got town.
I thought multiple wagons were pro-town?UncertainKitten wrote:Hi, why is there a Phate counterwagon to xvart scum? This is very telling ^-^.
In this instance, the way it reads to me, it is scummy. I've explained it at least a couple of times now.LlamaFluff wrote:So ordering was scummy?
Not necessarily, after I realized my mistake, they went back to neutral. The way I play, everyone is scummy until proven otherwise, so I'm not going to pop them up into obvtown. I'm leaning slightly town with Elli and undecided on DGB.LlamaFluff wrote:So ordering was scummy?
[quote="LlamaFluff]Good, so you are going to join the DGB and Eli are town camp I guess?
Zorblag wrote:@Debonair Danny DiPietro, there were a couple reasons that I went with Phate as the lurker that was the most appealing to see if there was interest in lynching.
d3x wrote:OK. I've caught up completely. I doubt many will like the way this post goes down, but I honestly think it'll be the easiest way for me to get into this game.
Another prod dodge (2 out of 3 posts) and one scummy observation. More votes please.popsofctown wrote:prod dodge
yes you guys wallpost that's why i'm afraid to catch up.
Wait, is zoraster modding this one? Is he a content nazi on prod dodges?
Um. Cawntent. Post 333 is scummy. Weird hanging prepositions all over the place. Clearly he's too stressed by the manipulation his role requires to use grammar properly.
[/quote]I'm sure you can explain without quoting it?Jack wrote:What would you say if I told you Gamma majorly scumslipped in our neighbor qt?