1) Riiiiiight. And how is it scummy? The rest is not really worth responding to.Robbnva wrote:1) I got nothing from your post, was I supposed to? I know the only thing you have done from your fake day kill is to not trust your opinions anymore and to keep an eye on your posts more cause to me faking a day kill is scummy.
Just a couple of things
2) what do you consider voting in a scummy way? (btw I wrote that as if it was me but i guarantee you some people are probably thinking about this themselves.)
3) you really don't think that faking a day kill is scummy?
4) I would not make jokes about NK buddies, not funny and very suspicious
5) cop even agrees what you did was stupid and accomplished nothing.
I have no freaking clue what the hell flinter is even talking about, info out of context really doesn't come across very well
2) Blatant OMGUS, Blatant wagoning, voting for pisspoor reasons (usually involved with the first two), voting out of stupidity, voting just cause, voting because it's a safe bet, voting for pretty much any other reason than "this person is scum, Vote:"
3) Not at all. It's a common gambit, which made me figure I wouldn't be able to fake it, but I got some good info out of it, so it's really no big deal.
4)
In one game, he was nk'd one night for being a claimed doc, and I was the next for being the best townie ever 
It was a joke in that we were the nk's together. I'd link you the game, but it's not over just yet. Will probably be soon though.5) Cop is an idiot. This has been established
Also, it would do something if you'd start to actually scumhunt. Oh wait, you cant because you ARE scum.
Because that is called tunneling and a terrible thing for town to do. If he's town, what will you have to go on tomorrow? Hell, if he's scum, what will you have to go on tomorrow? Not much right? I was making a point that you should still be looking at other players, lest they slip under the radar.danakillsu wrote:It is still my opinion, in fact. Robbnva kind of beat me to the punch. Why did we need to post our suspicions of other people when we already have a lynch candidate for the day. That would only give scum more information. So yeah, what you did was good...for scum.
Anyone that was positive he was scum before should still be now. What changed? He made oneRobbnva wrote:yeah it basically derailed the lynch and now some people are not sure if they want to go back to it.
terrible
post during the gambit. Go back and READWraith wrote:I can't understand how you all can still believe I'm scum after all the smart posts made in my defense by people like Wicked and Shanba. But if you all want to be gullible, be my guest.
Please tell me this isn't ACTUALLY an attempt to not get lynched. You know what I see this as?
Obvious buddying.
Sadly, though, I'm not too sure whether they would be your buddies or not, or if one is and whoever said "don't do that to me" is another... OHMYGODWIFOMOVERLOAD!!!!!
1) Or a positive one. Just depends how you do itsingersigner wrote:1...reading between the lines is good, but be careful about misrepping people. That can have a very negative affect indeed.Xite wrote:1) [selfmetaignorablerant]Haha, no I wouldn't be surprised if I got lynched sometime during the day. People always find me scummy, but for the most part it is effective. And I don't call out everyone that disagrees with me. I call people out for the way they post and what they say. I tend to be a read between the lines player[/selfmetaignorablerant]
2 and 3 contradict each other, therefore I will not respond to them until you decide which one you're going to go with.
2...I don't get it...how are you interpreting that as a contradiction?
2) You're tunneling, and you're suspecting everyone. (that would be the contradiction right there)
"Good news everyone!"
