)1-10) Nope, there's definitely stuff in there. Read again.
11) You might want to reread that post. I think you messed up a bit there
12) She wasn't adding anything of her own, just restating other's opinions.
13) Obviously, you don't know what the term "throwing spaghetti" means. Maybe you should ask before making assumptions.
15) Whoa wait. Where did I say that?
17) Hahahaha. Would you like me to quote where you were so apt to follow me? What does that make you?
18) Ok?
21) Read it again.
22) Uhm.... what? Where in that entire thread does that look like I have a god-complex. Besides, since when are god-complexes scummy. And if they are, I can give you a good long list of policy lynches for you to keep with you whenever you are playing
23) I figured it out
24) I think you might want to reevaluate your numbering system...
27) K. And that's scummy because?
28) Read my response to 27
29) And he was in my mind until I reread him.
31) You were already pinging my scumdar, but not as much. And it was you going, "well it's like this, but it could be like that or even that" which is pretty much setting yourself up for every avenue out there
32) K, so I made one mistake, lynch me. Give me a few days, I can prove to you how great a scumhunter I am after one of my games end.
33) That was a gut read based on what Frank was saying about each of you. Yes, since he flipped town that all goes out the window, but there's plenty more that makes you scummy so, no, it doesn't clear you. Also, I had reasons, so no it wasn't throwing spaghetti. Throwing spaghetti is where you throw out a bunch of suspicion, see what everyone else attacks, and then tunnel that person until they're lynched.
36) Because, even though the wagon had valid REASONS, I was more suspicious of the players jumping on. Also, the time where I would have voted I wasn't on. Remember how fast this thread explodes. Remember also that those explosions are USUALLY when I'm asleep.
40)
You mean I was OMGUSing his OMGUS vote? Holy shit, way to take things out of context. Seriously, you left out a whole case and then used one out of context point of it against me. You're so scum.41) Again, there's this thing called context. Try using it sometime. That was my RL attitude and I was using it as an example to what he was saying. Also, it really depends on how the person does it. Quote me the time I said it was scummy and I'll tell you the exact differences that made his scummy.
81) Again, ok? Why is that scummy?
First, point out where these "words that don't amount to much" are. I'd really like to see them.robbie wrote:sigh, it's getting late. kind of hard to weed through Xite's ISOs cause she posts a bunch of words that really don't amount to much, yet she accuses others of the same thing. I will try and do more later, but people need to step back and make sure they want Xite leading them cause her reads haven't panned out yet and not sure they ever will.
Dana, you wanted a suggestion on who to investigate? Xite would be the first person I would investigate if I was a cop. She is doing a damn good job of making herself look town, would not suprise me if she was actually mafia. She says people are scum because of things they do and she goes and does the same things.
Again, I do not go and do the same things. The only times you pointed out that I did were out of context and wrong, and a blatant lie. Hmmm...
