Mars 2/Mini 243 - We Didn't Start the Fire, Game Over

bloojay · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:01 pm

i assume Tamuz means BabyJesus.

uh...

Vote This is not me

. Anyone who picks such a silly name deserves to be lynched

MODEDIT: Cause this is not HTML

bloojay · Post Post #50 (isolation #1) » Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:59 am

well, since we really have no other semi-leads at this moment....

unvote This is not me, Vote Bamboomancer

a-yup. that's about the size of it.

MOD EDIT: This is BB Code not HTML!

bloojay · Post Post #79 (isolation #2) » Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:21 am

I think it would be the setup This is not me mentioned. That's seemed to be the case in every mini i've been in.

Anyways, Tamuz, you silly, Disney himself isn't even in the song, but i assume you knew that.

bloojay · Post Post #119 (isolation #3) » Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:55 pm

It looks like it is a lynch. Unless Iammars didn't count stark's vote?

bloojay · Post Post #129 (isolation #4) » Thu Nov 03, 2005 1:59 pm

vote BabyJesus

for fairly obvious reasons

bloojay · Post Post #138 (isolation #5) » Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:21 am

BabyJesus wrote:
bloojay wrote:
vote BabyJesus

for fairly obvious reasons
such as?

well, the whole lynching an innocent person buisness. That kind of qualifies, wouldn't you say?

bloojay · Post Post #155 (isolation #6) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 6:21 pm

Tamuz wrote:To Bloojay/BJ: Yeah bloojay, you were on that bandwagon without very pretty logic yet now you are using that against BJ.

Well, not exactly. From what BJ was saying, he was pushing pretty hard for bamboomancer's lynch. If it seems like someone has info, then the masses will go after him. And after the lynch, he was innocent. That doesn't seem a little suspicious to you on BJ's part?

Tamuz wrote:And don't even try to pull a "BJ was claiming cop with a guilty investigation".

Ok, I won't, because he clearly never said anything of the sort.

Also! I looked at past games BJ has been in, and he does seem to tend to do this. But since you never can be to careful, my vote stays for now.

bloojay · Post Post #206 (isolation #7) » Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:35 pm

Ok. Now i know something's up.
Someone vote BabyJesus, please. You more than likely won't regret it, if my lead is true. If it isn't...well, i'll explain myself tomorrow.

bloojay · Post Post #223 (isolation #8) » Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:01 am

BabyJesus wrote:was I viewed bad as a mason again....

no, but i have information that proves you a liar. But not enough people want me to say it, so I won't just yet.

bloojay · Post Post #238 (isolation #9) » Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:22 pm

BabyJesus wrote: Are you sure enough of your information that you are willing to be lynched next if/when I am proved to be truthful....

Uh, yeah. Pretty much. Didn't I already say that? If I didn't, I meant to.

LyingBrian wrote:how about Vote: Bloojay, because he doesn't know how to spell.

oh, like that's that much better of a reason. So is that a "bloojay, show your info" then?

bloojay · Post Post #241 (isolation #10) » Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:50 pm

BabyJesus wrote:still waiting for this "info".....

and i'm still waiting for more than one person to ask for it. Actually, 2 people have i think, but i was never good at counting. Still, i would like some people to care before i say anything.

bloojay · Post Post #247 (isolation #11) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 2:13 am

Well, i'll guess i'll go ahead and reveal.
Lets put it this way. Why, in a game of this size with any amount of normailty, would there be 2 mason groups? that's 5 people right there.
Yeah, I'm a mason. My role isn't rock and roller cola wars, i'll come out with my name if i need to later. but trust me on this one, guys. I'm fairly sure that BJ is full of crap.

bloojay · Post Post #259 (isolation #12) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 6:00 pm

BabyJesus wrote:Bloojay, do you know your partner??

Yeah, both of 'em.

bloojay · Post Post #261 (isolation #13) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:11 pm

Nai wrote:I think that Bloojay either needs to die hard (as he said, two mason groups? Besides, a three mason group sounds waaay too close to a scum group, don'tcha think?) for his claim.

Well, that cinches it then. If we kill BJ and i'm right (and I am quite a bit more than fairly sure now that I am) then we know exactly who to go for the next day. I guess its all up to you guys now. But If you guys kill me....that's 2 wrong choices for lynching and no right ones. Oops.

bloojay · Post Post #279 (isolation #14) » Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:22 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:Bloojay, did your pm say you KNOW your mason buddies are innocent? I was a mini (weather mafia) with a 3 mason group where one of my mason buddies there was not....
bump for bloojay..... my role pm specifically said I knew my mason buddy was innocent. Did yours?

Yes, it did state that. And I am starting to get very suspicious of you, stark. What's with the asking of role names? And "definition of my group"? Please explain.

bloojay · Post Post #288 (isolation #15) » Sun Nov 13, 2005 6:48 am

stark wrote:ey man, cut me some slack. this is the first pro-town role ive ever played. you claim to have a three person mason group, this is what im asking you to go into further detail with

Alrighty then.

bloojay · Post Post #290 (isolation #16) » Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:22 am

BabyJesus wrote:shouldn't you be unvoting....

why would i do that? I'm still incredibly sure of my correctness. if i'm not, oh noes, i'll probably die. we're in the same sort of boat.

bloojay · Post Post #298 (isolation #17) » Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:42 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
bloojay wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:shouldn't you be unvoting....
why would i do that? I'm still incredibly sure of my correctness. if i'm not, oh noes, i'll probably die. we're in the same sort of boat.
this confuses me.... I have been confirmed....

yeah, but you could just as easily been confirmed by a scum partner. this has happened to me numerous times and i'm just not willing to take the chance right now.

bloojay · Post Post #308 (isolation #18) » Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:51 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
bloojay wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
bloojay wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:shouldn't you be unvoting....
why would i do that? I'm still incredibly sure of my correctness. if i'm not, oh noes, i'll probably die. we're in the same sort of boat.
this confuses me.... I have been confirmed....
yeah, but you could just as easily been confirmed by a scum partner. this has happened to me numerous times and i'm just not willing to take the chance right now.

are you still 100% willing to be lynched tomorrow if I am telling the truth....

a-yup. because I know that I am telling the truth about my role as well, and if i'm wrong somehow then i get the "oh NOES! he told us to lynch you but was wrong" stuff that you got and maybe one or both of my buddies will confirm me after i get bandwagoned, if I get lynched it is the town's loss and the scum's gain.

bloojay · Post Post #319 (isolation #19) » Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:26 pm

LyingBrian wrote:
vote: bloojay

this day has to end some time & no one has stepped up to confirm bloojay as a mason, so he has the best chance of lying... if he's telling the truth, we still have 2 masons, and an easy lynch tomorrow...

or, we can lynch babyjesus or Nai, prove one of them innocent if they ARE telling the truth, prove me innocent when you guy try and lynch me and a buddy comes to my rescue, and then know that we had 5 confirmed townies all along.

or, we could lynch you, and follow my other scenario tomorrow. I agree with BJ, what you said right there was mighty scummy.

FOS LyingBrian

[/list]

bloojay · Post Post #332 (isolation #20) » Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:51 am

stark wrote:alright, considering that bloojay has failed, at least in my mind, to produce sufficient evidence to support his claim, i hereby
vote bloojay

there really isn't much else i could do to support my claim. any help would have to come from my buddies.

bloojay · Post Post #333 (isolation #21) » Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:53 am

oh, and i miught as well do this now.

Unvote BJ, vote LyingBrian

you're getting far too scummy with your statements. i'm willing to lay off of BabyJesus for now.

bloojay · Post Post #358 (isolation #22) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:17 pm

LyingBrian wrote:well if you have any doubts, you could let me live & i could kill someone tonight to prove my claim...

well, see, at a certain point we have to stop doing this. we've already done it twice, once with me and once with BJ. third time's the charm, though, and you made an incredibly risky claim there.

but then again, TINM is pulling a risky move as well. spelling stuff wrong? a run-on sentence? maybe its some kind of post restriction, but like Tamuz said, you're very cryptic right now.

bloojay · Post Post #381 (isolation #23) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:58 am

either way, i still want an explanation from TINM on his actions.

vote TINM

bloojay · Post Post #388 (isolation #24) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 7:14 pm

This is not me wrote:I just thought that he was innocent, that simple, i have 3/5 votes so i think it is time to rc i am television, roleblocker and i have blocked every nihgt untill now cubsfan4ever

alright, believeable enough for now.

Unvote Vote Stark

though, why did you say cubs in that? did you block him last night?

bloojay · Post Post #405 (isolation #25) » Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:25 pm

probably gone for thanksgiving. but....i think raj and nanook are the only ones who haven't claimed. i'll check real quick.

...
...
...

nope, he hasn't.

unvote, vote Raj.

in retrospect, has made very odd and scummy switches throughout the game.

BabyJesus wrote:Bloo/Tamuz - who is the 3rd member of your mason group?

well, i guess it wouldn't hurt....lemme think on that more, though.

bloojay · Post Post #409 (isolation #26) » Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:38 pm

Tamuz wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
bloojay wrote:probably gone for thanksgiving. but....i think raj and nanook are the only ones who haven't claimed. i'll check real quick.

...
...
...

nope, he hasn't.
unvote, vote Raj.
in retrospect, has made very odd and scummy switches throughout the game.

BabyJesus wrote:Bloo/Tamuz - who is the 3rd member of your mason group?
well, i guess it wouldn't hurt....lemme think on that more, though.
like we don't all know its Nanook....
Then why ask?

exactly. anyways, i'd figured you guys had figured it out by now. But why not just come out and say it?

bloojay · Post Post #411 (isolation #27) » Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:45 pm

heh, i guess you're right.

well, now all we're waiting on is a claim from raj...then rapid-fire debating or some such thing

bloojay · Post Post #414 (isolation #28) » Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:45 am

This is not me wrote:i for some reason think that tamuz/bloojay/nanook group is the mafia

you're wrong. wrong wrong wrong.

well....Raj's claim makes sense, and the 2 people i believe least right now are TINM and Stark (in no particular order). you all already know my reasons for the former, but i just thought of something for the latter. The roles seem to be pretty spread out. Why would 2 roles be in such close proximity to each other in the song? i need to think more before i vote, but i'm at least going to

FOS Stark

.

bloojay · Post Post #421 (isolation #29) » Thu Nov 24, 2005 11:36 am

Unvote Raj

bloojay · Post Post #423 (isolation #30) » Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:52 pm

Nai wrote:
This is not me wrote:i for some reason think that tamuz/bloojay/nanook group is the mafia
Of the people that are around, I really think you should be lynched. Just for backing the SK so much. I forget, have you claimed yet?

yeah, he claimed to be a roleblocker who blocked Cubs every night.

Nai wrote:While it would make sense for Bloojay and his two friends to be scum, it's a VERY stupid move. I've looked at Bloojay play. I don't think he's that stupid. Nor do I believe that those that have backed him are stupid enough to do so if they were scum.

aw, thanks. that doesn't happen very often.

bloojay · Post Post #434 (isolation #31) » Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Vote TINM

too many contradictions. far too many for you to be kept alive.

bloojay · Post Post #452 (isolation #32) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:40 am

uh, ok. you guys are dumptards if you vote for us. Which is why we probably should've lynched one of you back when my first suspicions arose.

But no matter.

Vote BJ

with any luck, we'll kill mafia today, boys. Just vote BJ. If you kill either me, Tamuz, or Nanook today then town loses. And do you really want that on your concience, raj? do you?

bloojay · Post Post #457 (isolation #33) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:44 am

Nai wrote:Is that the best you can come up with, Bloojay? "Kill them or you'll have our deaths on your conscience"?

Well, its more like a loss at the hands of someone with information that he knows is right.

Nai wrote:Where's your third mason member to speak up, saying he's in the mason party?

If you haven't noticed, he's been not posting in all of his games. I guess he's away for something. Perhaps a prod, Iammars?

Lemme ask you 2 (Nai and BJ) a question....what happened to you guy's suspicions of Stark? Did they just disappear after last night? He's posted, and you guys haven't seen him to be NEARLY as scummy as you have on previous days.

bloojay · Post Post #466 (isolation #34) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:44 pm

wow. you guys are seriously idiots.

stark wrote:HAHAHAHAHA!!!! trying to bring suspicion back to me to save your ass?
unvote, vote bloojay

wow, give this guy a gold star.

And whoever is the remaining townie (i think Raj), then you get a gold star too. way to go.

bloojay · Post Post #505 (isolation #35) » Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:00 am

agh! i guess I feel worse about my accusations now though. I was fairly sure that the 3 townies in endgame were mafia....oh well. You can't win 'em all, right?

Good game, mod. 'Twas fun. And You guys were a fun group to be brought back in to scum with.

bloojay · Post Post #509 (isolation #36) » Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:41 pm

Yeah, about that... Tamuz really was my other partner, we were nixon-based.

If you guys remember, back on day 2 when you guys asked if i knew my partners were innocent? Total BS. I was hoping someone would back me eventually, I had no idea. I guess that kind of helped in the detriment

bloojay · Post Post #512 (isolation #37) » Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:11 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
bloojay wrote: If you guys remember, back on day 2 when you guys asked if i knew my partners were innocent? Total BS. I was hoping someone would back me eventually, I had no idea. I guess that kind of helped in the detriment
Jesus Christ. Are you kidding me? There was a reason I specifically asked if you knew that.

haha, yeah. Sorry, BJ.